StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. Integration As A Service
  5. SnapLogic vs StreamSets

SnapLogic vs StreamSets

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

SnapLogic
SnapLogic
Stacks11
Followers18
Votes0
StreamSets
StreamSets
Stacks53
Followers133
Votes0

SnapLogic vs StreamSets: What are the differences?

## Introduction
When choosing between SnapLogic and StreamSets for your data integration needs, it's important to understand the key differences between the two platforms to make an informed decision.

1. **Architecture**: SnapLogic follows a scale-out architecture where users can easily add more nodes to increase capacity, while StreamSets uses a cluster-based architecture which allows for better resource utilization and scalability.
2. **Connectors**: SnapLogic offers a wide range of pre-built connectors for various data sources and platforms, making it easy to integrate with different systems. On the other hand, StreamSets provides more customization options for connectors, allowing users to tailor their connections to specific requirements.
3. **User Interface**: SnapLogic's user interface is more visually appealing and user-friendly, with drag-and-drop functionalities that make it easier for users to design data pipelines. StreamSets, on the other hand, offers a more technical interface that may require a steeper learning curve but allows for more fine-tuned control over data processes.
4. **Community Support**: SnapLogic has a strong community support system with a robust knowledge base and active forums for users to share experiences and troubleshoot issues. StreamSets, while also having community support, may not have as extensive resources and documentation available.
5. **Real-time Processing**: StreamSets is known for its strong real-time data processing capabilities, allowing users to process and analyze data as it flows through the system. While SnapLogic supports real-time processing as well, StreamSets is often preferred for its efficiency in this area.
6. **Deployment Options**: SnapLogic offers both cloud and on-premise deployment options, catering to a wide range of users with different preferences. StreamSets, on the other hand, focuses more on on-premise deployment, which may be preferred by organizations with strict data security and compliance requirements.

In Summary, understanding the architecture, connectors, user interface, community support, real-time processing, and deployment options are key factors to consider when choosing between SnapLogic and StreamSets for your data integration needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

SnapLogic
SnapLogic
StreamSets
StreamSets

It provides data and application integration tools for connecting Cloud data sources, SaaS applications and on-premise business applications.

An end-to-end data integration platform to build, run, monitor and manage smart data pipelines that deliver continuous data for DataOps.

Customer Experience/CRM; Cloud Data Warehousing; Finance & Accounting; Human Capital Management; Big Data
Only StreamSets provides a single design experience for all design patterns (batch, streaming, CDC, ETL, ELT, and ML pipelines) for 10x greater developer productivity; smart data pipelines that are resilient to change for 80% less breakages; and a single pane of glass for managing and monitoring all pipelines across hybrid and cloud architectures to eliminate blind spots and control gaps.
Statistics
Stacks
11
Stacks
53
Followers
18
Followers
133
Votes
0
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Cons
  • 2
    No user community
  • 1
    Crashes
Integrations
Microsoft Dynamics 365
Microsoft Dynamics 365
Eloqua
Eloqua
Oracle
Oracle
Tableau
Tableau
Snowflake
Snowflake
Amazon Redshift
Amazon Redshift
HBase
HBase
Databricks
Databricks
Amazon Redshift
Amazon Redshift
MySQL
MySQL
gRPC
gRPC
Google BigQuery
Google BigQuery
Amazon Kinesis
Amazon Kinesis
Cassandra
Cassandra
Hadoop
Hadoop
Redis
Redis

What are some alternatives to SnapLogic, StreamSets?

Kafka

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Celery

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

Amazon SQS

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

Apache Spark

Apache Spark

Spark is a fast and general processing engine compatible with Hadoop data. It can run in Hadoop clusters through YARN or Spark's standalone mode, and it can process data in HDFS, HBase, Cassandra, Hive, and any Hadoop InputFormat. It is designed to perform both batch processing (similar to MapReduce) and new workloads like streaming, interactive queries, and machine learning.

ActiveMQ

ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.

ZeroMQ

ZeroMQ

The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.

Presto

Presto

Distributed SQL Query Engine for Big Data

Apache NiFi

Apache NiFi

An easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. It supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of data routing, transformation, and system mediation logic.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase