StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Monitoring
  4. Dependency Monitoring
  5. Snyk vs Veracode

Snyk vs Veracode

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Snyk
Snyk
Stacks580
Followers380
Votes20
Veracode
Veracode
Stacks66
Followers129
Votes0

Snyk vs Veracode: What are the differences?

Introduction: Snyk and Veracode are both security testing tools used to identify vulnerabilities in software applications. While they share the common goal of improving application security, there are some key differences between the two.

1. Snyk vs. Veracode: Scanning Approach Snyk uses an open-source-centric approach, focusing mainly on identifying vulnerabilities in open-source libraries and container images. It scans the dependencies of an application and provides detailed information on the vulnerabilities found in those components. On the other hand, Veracode offers a more holistic approach, conducting both static and dynamic analysis to identify vulnerabilities across the entire application, including custom code, third-party libraries, and frameworks.

2. Snyk vs. Veracode: Integration and Automation Snyk provides seamless integration with various development tools, such as IDEs, source code repositories, build systems, and CI/CD pipelines. It allows developers to easily incorporate security testing into their existing workflows and enables automation of vulnerability scanning. Veracode also offers integration with development environments and CI/CD tools, but it may require more configuration and setup compared to Snyk.

3. Snyk vs. Veracode: False Positives Snyk has a reputation for providing fewer false positives, meaning it has a higher accuracy in identifying real vulnerabilities without unnecessary alarms. This is partly because Snyk focuses on specific components, making it easier to pinpoint real issues. Veracode, while offering comprehensive scanning capabilities, sometimes generates false positives that can require additional effort to investigate and validate.

4. Snyk vs. Veracode: Remediation Guidance Snyk excels in providing actionable remediation guidance for identified vulnerabilities. It offers detailed information on how to fix or mitigate the vulnerabilities found, including direct links to official documentation and best practices. Veracode also provides remediation guidance, but it may not be as extensive or granular as Snyk's recommendations.

5. Snyk vs. Veracode: Community Support Snyk has an active and engaged community, including developers, security professionals, and contributors to open source projects. This community presence enables users to benefit from shared knowledge, best practices, and ongoing support. Veracode also offers support resources, but its community might not be as vibrant or extensive as Snyk's.

6. Snyk vs. Veracode: Pricing and Licensing Snyk offers flexible pricing options, including free plans, tiered pricing based on usage, and enterprise packages. It is renowned for its developer-friendly approach and focus on simplicity. Veracode, on the other hand, tends to have higher pricing tiers and is often perceived as more suitable for larger enterprises that require comprehensive security testing capabilities.

In summary, Snyk focuses on open-source vulnerabilities, provides integration and automation capabilities, has fewer false positives, offers detailed remediation guidance, benefits from an active community, and offers flexible pricing options. Veracode, meanwhile, offers a more holistic scanning approach, comprehensive integration, and larger enterprises as its target market.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Snyk, Veracode

Bryan
Bryan

SRE Manager at Subsplash

Apr 1, 2020

Needs adviceonWhiteSourceWhiteSourceSnykSnykSonatype NexusSonatype Nexus

I'm beginning to research the right way to better integrate how we achieve SCA / shift-left / SecureDevOps / secure software supply chain. If you use or have evaluated WhiteSource, Snyk, Sonatype Nexus, SonarQube or similar, I would very much appreciate your perspective on strengths and weaknesses and how you selected your ultimate solution. I want to integrate with GitLab CI.

461k views461k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Snyk
Snyk
Veracode
Veracode

Automatically find & fix vulnerabilities in your code, containers, Kubernetes, and Terraform

It seamlessly integrates application security into the software lifecycle, effectively eliminating vulnerabilities during the lowest-cost point in the development/deployment chain, and blocking threats while in production.

-
Statice Application Security Scanning; Dynamic Application Security Scanning
Statistics
Stacks
580
Stacks
66
Followers
380
Followers
129
Votes
20
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 10
    Github Integration
  • 5
    Free for open source projects
  • 4
    Finds lots of real vulnerabilities
  • 1
    Easy to deployed
Cons
  • 2
    Does not integrated with SonarQube
  • 1
    False positives
  • 1
    Complex UI
  • 1
    No surface monitoring
  • 1
    No malware detection
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Scala
Scala
.NET
.NET
GitHub
GitHub
CircleCI
CircleCI
Docker
Docker
JavaScript
JavaScript
Node.js
Node.js
Python
Python
Golang
Golang
Java
Java
Gradle
Gradle
Apache Maven
Apache Maven
Jenkins
Jenkins
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Travis CI
Travis CI
Apache Ant
Apache Ant
Appveyor
Appveyor

What are some alternatives to Snyk, Veracode?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Let's Encrypt

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

Sqreen

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

Instant 2FA

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana