StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Testing Frameworks
  5. TestComplete vs Testim

TestComplete vs Testim

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

TestComplete
TestComplete
Stacks39
Followers60
Votes0
Testim
Testim
Stacks34
Followers57
Votes0

TestComplete vs Testim: What are the differences?

  1. Integration: TestComplete offers seamless integration with various tools such as Jenkins, JIRA, and Git, which enhances the automation process. In contrast, Testim provides integration with tools like Slack and TestRail that offer a unique set of capabilities for test management and communication.

  2. AI and ML Capabilities: Testim leverages advanced Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) algorithms to create and execute tests faster, intelligently adapt to changes, and provide insights on test results. While TestComplete also has AI capabilities, Testim's emphasis on AI and ML is more pronounced in its testing approach.

  3. Collaboration Features: Testim enables real-time collaboration among team members, allowing them to share and work on test scripts simultaneously. On the other hand, TestComplete provides collaborative features, but Testim's emphasis on real-time collaboration sets it apart in terms of team efficiency and productivity.

  4. Programming Languages Supported: TestComplete supports multiple programming languages such as JavaScript, Python, and VBScript, offering flexibility to automation engineers. Conversely, Testim primarily focuses on JavaScript for test automation scripting, which may limit the choice for teams preferring other programming languages.

  5. Cross-Browser Testing Capabilities: TestComplete provides extensive support for cross-browser testing, allowing automation engineers to test web applications across multiple browsers effortlessly. In comparison, Testim also offers cross-browser testing capabilities but emphasizes creating and executing tests efficiently with minimal manual intervention.

  6. Community Support and Documentation: TestComplete has a well-established community and comprehensive documentation that assists users in resolving issues effectively and promotes knowledge sharing. On the other hand, Testim, being a newer platform, has a growing community but may have limited resources compared to TestComplete.

In Summary, TestComplete and Testim differ in integration capabilities, AI and ML usage, collaboration features, supported programming languages, cross-browser testing capabilities, and community support/documentation.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

TestComplete
TestComplete
Testim
Testim

It is an automated UI testing tool that makes it fast and easy to create, maintain, and execute functional tests across desktop, web, and mobile applications. With TestComplete, you can increase test coverage and ensure you ship high-quality, battle-tested software

It uses artificial intelligence to speed-up the authoring, execution, and maintenance of automated tests.

Building Automated UI Tests; Object Recognition Engine now with Artificial Intelligence; HTML5 Test Automation; Data-Driven Testing; Automated Test Reporting & Analysis
Super fast authoring; Machine learning based self-maintenance; Efficiency at scale; Fast, scalable test runs
Statistics
Stacks
39
Stacks
34
Followers
60
Followers
57
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Jenkins
Jenkins
Git
Git
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Jira
Jira
Bugzilla
Bugzilla
Travis CI
Travis CI
GitHub
GitHub
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Jira
Jira
TeamCity
TeamCity
Slack
Slack
Codeship
Codeship
Trello
Trello
Jenkins
Jenkins
StrongLoop
StrongLoop

What are some alternatives to TestComplete, Testim?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana