StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. Web Service Automation
  5. Tray.io vs Zapier

Tray.io vs Zapier

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Zapier
Zapier
Stacks1.6K
Followers1.2K
Votes114
Tray.io
Tray.io
Stacks30
Followers56
Votes0

Tray.io vs Zapier: What are the differences?

Introduction:

When it comes to automation, there are several tools available that can help streamline business workflows. Two popular options are Tray.io and Zapier, which provide automation and integration services. However, there are key differences between these two platforms that make them unique and suitable for different use cases.

  1. Pricing: Tray.io offers a more tailored pricing model based on specific needs, whereas Zapier provides fixed pricing plans. With Tray.io, users have the flexibility to choose the features they need and pay accordingly, while Zapier offers a set of plans with different tiers and limitations. This allows users to have more control over their automation costs with Tray.io.

  2. Complexity and Customization: Tray.io is designed for more complex integration scenarios, offering advanced functionality and the ability to build custom connectors. It allows users to create intricate workflows with conditional branching and data transformations. On the other hand, Zapier focuses on simplicity and ease of use, making it more suitable for basic automation needs without advanced customization options.

  3. Connectivity: Tray.io provides a wide range of connectors and pre-built integrations, including support for specialized enterprise systems. It offers a robust set of APIs and connectors to easily connect to various platforms and services. Zapier also offers a large number of connectors but has a narrower focus and may not have the same level of support for enterprise systems as Tray.io.

  4. Automation capabilities: Tray.io allows users to create complex workflows that involve data manipulation, mapping, and transformations. It enables users to build conditional logic, handle errors, and take advantage of features like webhooks and parallel execution. Zapier, on the other hand, is more limited in terms of workflow complexity and automation capabilities, focusing on simpler tasks such as triggering actions based on events or integrating commonly used apps.

  5. Collaboration and Teamwork: Tray.io provides extensive collaboration features, allowing multiple team members to work together on automation projects. It offers version control, role-based access controls, and the ability to comment and collaborate directly within workflows. Zapier also supports collaboration to some extent, but its features are more limited compared to Tray.io.

  6. Support and Assistance: Tray.io provides dedicated support for its users, including access to a customer success manager, live chat support, and a comprehensive knowledge base. It also offers training and onboarding assistance to help users get up to speed with the platform more quickly. Zapier offers support through email and a knowledge base, but it lacks the personalized support and assistance provided by Tray.io.

In Summary, Tray.io offers more flexible pricing, advanced customization options, extensive connectivity, complex automation capabilities, comprehensive collaboration features, and dedicated support, making it a suitable choice for users with complex integration requirements and enterprise needs. On the other hand, Zapier focuses on simplicity and ease of use, providing basic automation capabilities and a larger number of pre-built app integrations.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Zapier, Tray.io

Yisroel
Yisroel

Jul 7, 2020

Needs adviceonMailchimpMailchimpQuickBooksQuickBooksTray.ioTray.io

Hey! We are Raisegiving, a payments platform geared towards helping nonprofits raise money and manage donors. We are looking to give our Users (Admins of nonprofits) the ability to integrate their Raisegiving account with other tools such as Mailchimp and QuickBooks.

Examples of desired use cases:

  • Users should be able to sync Raisegiving audience with their Mailchimp audience, trigger the creation of a new Mailchimp audience based on data from their Raisegiving account.
  • Donations made on our platform should sync with users Quickbooks account.

Does anyone have any helpful insights into the pros and cons of Tray.io vs Zapier?

111k views111k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Zapier
Zapier
Tray.io
Tray.io

Zapier is for busy people who know their time is better spent selling, marketing, or coding. Instead of wasting valuable time coming up with complicated systems - you can use Zapier to automate the web services you and your team are already using on a daily basis.

It is cloud data integration platform designed for marketing, sales, and customer support teams of medium-sized companies and large enterprises.

A Zap is a blueprint for a task you want to do over and over. In words, a Zap looks like this: "When I get a new thing in A, do this other thing in B." The first part is the trigger and the second part is the action. An example is "When I get a new entry from a Wufoo form, create a new lead in Salesforce.";You can pick what fields from the trigger service should go to the action service and you can use static text and custom fields too. For instance, you might say that the phone number from your Wufoo form should be the work phone of your new Salesforce lead.;Zapier regularly checks your trigger for new data. When the Zap triggers, Zapier automatically performs your action for you. Continuing with the Wufoo scenario, say you receive five new entries. Zapier takes each one and makes a new lead in Salesforce, customized to the way you specified in your Zap.;Without any more effort from you, data flows from one service to the other
ETL - extract / transfer / load; Configurable workflow; Dynamic workflow; Graphical workflow editor; Workflow management; Drag & drop interface; Branching; Data storage management
Statistics
Stacks
1.6K
Stacks
30
Followers
1.2K
Followers
56
Votes
114
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 45
    Sync cloud services
  • 34
    Easy setup
  • 15
    Scheduled tasks
  • 8
    Great customer support
  • 6
    Gives me updates anytime, anywhere
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
PagerDuty
PagerDuty
Intercom
Intercom
Airbrake
Airbrake
Zulip
Zulip
Contentful
Contentful
Gmail
Gmail
Discourse
Discourse

What are some alternatives to Zapier, Tray.io?

IFTTT

IFTTT

It helps you connect all of your different apps and devices. You can enable your apps and devices to work together to do specific things they couldn't do otherwise.

n8n

n8n

It is a free node based Workflow Automation Tool. Easily automate tasks accross different services. Synchronise data between different apps/databases.

Apache Camel

Apache Camel

An open source Java framework that focuses on making integration easier and more accessible to developers.

Ghost Inspector

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

Integromat

Integromat

It is an easy to use, powerful tool with unique features for automating manual processes. Connect your favorite apps, services and devices with each other without having any programming skills.

Actionsflow

Actionsflow

It helps you to automate workflows, it's a free IFTTT/Zapier alternative for developers. With this tool, you can connect your favorite apps, data, and APIs, receive notifications of actions as they occur, sync files, collect data, and more.

bip.io

bip.io

bip.io is an open source web automation platform, making it easy to build powerful personal workflows from your favorite cloud services, applications and devices.

shipi18n

shipi18n

Shipi18n is a translation API built for developers. Translate JSON and i18n files to 100+ languages while automatically preserving placeholders like {name}, {{count}}, and %s. Key features: • Native i18next support with CLDR pluralization (auto-generates _one, _few, _many, _other) • Placeholder preservation for ICU MessageFormat • 90-day translation memory caching • Key-based pricing (pay per unique string, not API calls) Developer tools: npm SDK, CLI, GitHub Action, Vite plugin, i18next backend

Contact form 7 to any API

Contact form 7 to any API

Contact Form 7 to Any API allows WordPress users to send form submissions to any external API or CRM with precision and ease. The free version supports basic features such as single API endpoints, JSON payloads, headers, and logging. With the Pro version, you can configure multi-endpoint routing, conditional logic, nested JSON bodies, field mapping, custom headers per endpoint, and advanced response handling. Ideal for HubSpot, Mailchimp, ActiveCampaign, Zoho, and Pipedrive integrations. The optional OAuth 2.0 Add-On provides secure token handling and full authorization flows. Perfect for marketers, developers, and agencies seeking flexible, SaaS-free automation workflows.

Vulseek by Securetia

Vulseek by Securetia

At its core, Vulseek combines automated asset discovery and scanning with intelligent risk prioritization, allowing security teams to focus on what truly matters. Its customizable dashboards, real-time alerts, and integrations with popular ticketing systems and SIEMs help ensure vulnerabilities are addressed swiftly and systematically.

Related Comparisons

HipChat
Slack

HipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack

Litmus
Email on Acid

Email on Acid vs Litmus

InVision
Proto.io

InVision vs Marvel vs Proto.io

Webex
Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Slack
RocketChat

Mattermost vs RocketChat vs Slack