Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Red Hat Enterprise Linux vs Ubuntu: What are the differences?
# Introduction
1. **Package Management**: Red Hat Enterprise Linux uses the YUM package manager while Ubuntu uses APT-Advanced Package Tool.
2. **Support and Security Updates**: Red Hat Enterprise Linux comes with long-term support (up to 10 years) with security updates provided by the Red Hat Security Response Team. Ubuntu, on the other hand, offers shorter support cycles with regular updates and security patches.
3. **Licensing and Costs**: Red Hat Enterprise Linux is a commercial distribution requiring a subscription for access to updates and support. Ubuntu, in contrast, is free to use and distribute.
4. **Desktop Environment**: Red Hat Enterprise Linux focuses more on server environments and thus may not offer as many options for desktop environments compared to Ubuntu, which is popular for desktop usage.
5. **Community and Support**: Ubuntu has a larger and more active community which can be beneficial for troubleshooting and getting help compared to Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
6. **Target Audience**: Red Hat Enterprise Linux is primarily designed for enterprise users and businesses seeking a stable and secure platform, while Ubuntu caters to a wider range of users from beginners to advanced users including developers and enthusiasts.
In Summary, Red Hat Enterprise Linux and Ubuntu differ in package management, support models, costs, desktop environment focus, community size, and target audience.
Ubuntu is much more faster over Windows and helps to get software and other utilities easier and within a short span of time compared to Windows.
Ubuntu helps to get robustness and resiliency over Windows. Ubuntu runs faster than Windows on every computer that I have ever tested. LibreOffice (Ubuntu's default office suite) runs much faster than Microsoft Office on every computer that I have ever tested.
Global familiarity, free, widely used, and as a debian distro feels more comfortable when rapidly switching between local macOS and remote command lines.
CentOS does boast quite a few security/stability improvements, however as a RHEL-based distro, differs quite significantly in the command line and suffers from slightly less frequent package updates. (Could be a good or bad thing depending on your use-case and if it is public facing)
At the moment of the decision, my desktop was the primary place I did work. Due to this, I can't have it blow up on me while I work. While Arch is interesting and powerful, Ubuntu offers (at least for me) a lot more stability and lets me focus on other things than maintaining my own OS installation.
Pros of Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
- Well known1
- Paid sense of security1
- Learning curve1
Pros of Ubuntu
- Free to use230
- Easy setup for testing discord bot96
- Gateway Linux Distro57
- Simple interface54
- Don't need driver installation in most cases9
- Open Source6
- Many active communities6
- Software Availability3
- Easy to custom3
- Many flavors/distros based on ubuntu2
- Lightweight container base OS1
- Great OotB Linux Shell Experience1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
- Tools and package manager change over time1
- Subcription fees1
- Glibc based with many complicated hacks1
- Packages have huge dependency trees1
- Default Install is lvm1
- Anaconda1
Cons of Ubuntu
- Demanding system requirements5
- Adds overhead and unnecessary complexity over Debian4
- Snapd installed by default2
- Systemd1