Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Jitsi vs WebRTC: What are the differences?
Introduction:
Jitsi and WebRTC are both communication platforms that enable real-time audio and video communication. While their purposes are similar, there are key differences between the two.
Architecture: Jitsi is a video conferencing platform that uses WebRTC for its real-time communication. It provides a complete conference solution with features like screen sharing and chat. WebRTC, on the other hand, is a free, open-source project that provides protocols and APIs for real-time communication directly between web browsers.
Customizability: Jitsi offers a high level of customizability, allowing developers to modify the user interface and add new features according to their requirements. WebRTC, on the other hand, provides a lower-level API that leaves more implementation details to the developers, providing them with greater flexibility but also requiring more expertise.
Scalability: Jitsi is designed for small to medium-sized conferences and can handle a limited number of participants efficiently. In contrast, WebRTC is more scalable and can handle a larger number of participants, making it suitable for larger conferences or applications with higher user loads.
Infrastructure: Jitsi requires its own dedicated infrastructure for hosting the video conference servers, which can be either on-premises or in the cloud. WebRTC, on the other hand, leverages the existing infrastructure of web browsers, eliminating the need for dedicated servers.
Integration: Jitsi provides integration options with popular messaging platforms like Slack and Microsoft Teams, allowing users to seamlessly incorporate video conferencing into their existing workflows. WebRTC, however, is a standalone technology that does not offer built-in integrations and requires developers to implement the necessary integrations themselves.
Ecosystem: Jitsi benefits from a robust and active community that continuously contributes to its development, adding new features and fixing bugs. WebRTC has a larger ecosystem as it is a core technology used by various real-time communication platforms, resulting in a wider range of available libraries, frameworks, and resources.
In summary, Jitsi is a video conferencing platform built on top of WebRTC, providing a complete conference solution with customization options and integrations. WebRTC, on the other hand, is a versatile technology that allows for real-time communication directly between web browsers, offering scalability and a larger ecosystem but requiring more development expertise.
Hello. So, I wanted to make a decision on whether to use WebRTC or Amazon Chime for a conference call (meeting). My plan is to build an app with features like video broadcasting, and the ability for all the participants to talk and chat. I have used Agora's web SDK for video broadcasting, and Socket.IO for chat features. As I read the comparison between Amazon Chime and WebRTC, it further intrigues me on what I should use given my scenario? Is there any way that so many related technologies could be a hindrance to the other? Any advice would be appreciated. Thanks. Ritwik Neema
I would recommend Amazon Chime. If I were you, I would eventually look into working with WebRTC as it is very interesting and teaches you a lot. I dove deep into webRTC recently building a webinar broadcasting application (one-to-many) and I can say it is difficult to understand how things actually work and to get it stable. I mean you can vaguely read up on it and get some things to work by copying code on StackOverflow or using a library but that wouldn't teach you much.
In short, go with Chime because it is easy to get started especially if you have a time constraint. But look into webRTC in the future as it enables you to build your own "Chime". Hope this helped!
Pros of Jitsi
- Open Source32
- Entirely free conferencing20
- Unlimited time19
- Accessible from browser5
- Desktop, app and browser tab sharing3
- WebRTC standard3
- Secure & encrypted video conference2
- Great API to develop with2
- Live stream to youtube2
- Dial-In and Dial-Out via SIP1
- Full HD1
- FSB Approved1
- Share youtube videos in conference1
- Easy installation and good support1
- MCU0
Pros of WebRTC
- OpenSource3
- No Download2
- You can write anything around it, because it's a protoc1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Jitsi
- UnLimited time7
- No multiplatform5
- Great quality1
- Good support1
- Live conference statistics1
- Great features1