Yarn vs Yeoman

Overview

Yeoman

Stacks1.7K

Followers1.3K

Votes396

GitHub Stars10.1K

Forks730

Yarn

Stacks28.2K

Followers13.5K

Votes151

GitHub Stars41.5K

Forks2.7K

Yarn vs Yeoman: What are the differences?

Introduction: In this Markdown code snippet, we will outline key differences between Yarn and Yeoman.

Package Management vs. Project Scaffolding: Yarn is primarily a package manager used for dependency management in Node.js projects, while Yeoman is a scaffolding tool that helps developers quickly set up project structures with predefined templates and generators.
Installation Process: Yarn is installed via npm and is specific to managing packages, whereas Yeoman requires a separate installation process and is focused on generating project structures rather than package management.
Usage Scope: Yarn is mainly used during development to manage packages and dependencies within a project, ensuring consistency and reliability. On the other hand, Yeoman is used at the initial stage of project setup to create a foundation for the development environment.
Customization Capabilities: Yarn provides limited customization options compared to Yeoman, which allows for extensive customization through the use of generators and templates. Developers can tailor project structures and workflows to their specific needs using Yeoman.
Community Support and Ecosystem: Yarn has a large user base and support within the Node.js community, focusing on package management best practices. Yeoman, on the other hand, has a smaller but dedicated community that contributes generators and templates for various project types and frameworks.
Maintenance and Updates: Yarn is regularly updated with bug fixes and feature enhancements related to package management, while Yeoman updates are more focused on maintaining compatibility with new technologies and frameworks, adding new generators, and improving overall user experience.

In Summary, Yarn and Yeoman serve different purposes in the development workflow, with Yarn focusing on package management and Yeoman specializing in project scaffolding and structure setup.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Yeoman, Yarn

StackShare

Apr 23, 2019

Needs adviceon

Node.js

npm

Yarn

From a StackShare Community member: “I’m a freelance web developer (I mostly use Node.js) and for future projects I’m debating between npm or Yarn as my default package manager. I’m a minimalist so I hate installing software if I don’t need to- in this case that would be Yarn. For those who made the switch from npm to Yarn, what benefits have you noticed? For those who stuck with npm, are you happy you with it?"

294k views294k

Comments

zen-li

Apr 24, 2019

Reviewon

Yarn

p.s.

I am not sure about the performance of the latest version of npm, whether it is different from my understanding of it below. Because I use npm very rarely when I had the following knowledge.

------⏬

I use Yarn because, first, yarn is the first tool to lock the version. Second, although npm also supports the lock version, when you use npm to lock the version, and then use package-lock.json on other systems, package-lock.json Will be modified. You understand what I mean, when you deploy projects based on Git...

250k views250k

Comments

Oleksandr

Senior Software Engineer at joyn

Dec 7, 2019

Decided

As we have to build the application for many different TV platforms we want to split the application logic from the device/platform specific code. Previously we had different repositories and it was very hard to keep the development process when changes were done in multiple repositories, as we had to synchronize code reviews as well as merging and then updating the dependencies of projects. This issues would be even more critical when building the project from scratch what we did at Joyn. Therefor to keep all code in one place, at the same time keeping in separated in different modules we decided to give a try to monorepo. First we tried out lerna which was fine at the beginning, but later along the way we had issues with adding new dependencies which came out of the blue and were not easy to fix. Next round of evolution was yarn workspaces, we are still using it and are pretty happy with dev experience it provides. And one more advantage we got when switched to yarn workspaces that we also switched from npm to yarn what improved the state of the lock file a lot, because with npm package-lock file was updated every time you run npm install, frequent updates of package-lock file were causing very often merge conflicts. So right now we not just having faster dependencies installation time but also no conflicts coming from lock file.

310k views310k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Yeoman	Yarn
Yeoman is a robust and opinionated set of tools, libraries, and a workflow that can help developers quickly build beautiful, compelling web apps. It is comprised of yo - a scaffolding tool using our generator system, grunt - a task runner for your build process and bower for dependency management.	Yarn caches every package it downloads so it never needs to again. It also parallelizes operations to maximize resource utilization so install times are faster than ever.
Lightning-fast scaffolding — Easily scaffold new projects with customizable templates (e.g HTML5 Boilerplate, Bootstrap), RequireJS and more.;Great build process — Not only do you get minification and concatenation; I also optimize all your image files, HTML, compile your CoffeeScript and Compass files, if you're using AMD, I will pass those modules through r.js so you don't have to.;Automatically compile CoffeeScript & Compass — Our LiveReload watch process automatically compiles source files and refreshes your browser whenever a change is made so you don't have to.;Automatically lint your scripts — All your scripts are automatically run against JSHint to ensure they're following language best-practices.;Built-in preview server — No more having to fire up your own HTTP Server. My built-in one can be fired with just one command.;Awesome Image Optimization — I optimize all your images using OptiPNG and JPEGTran so your users can spend less time downloading assets and more time using your app.;Killer package management — Need a dependency? It's just a keystroke away. I allow you to easily search for new packages via the command-line (e.g. `bower search jquery`), install them and keep them updated without needing to open your browser.;PhantomJS Unit Testing — Easily run your unit tests in headless WebKit via PhantomJS. When you create a new application, I also include some test scaffolding for your app.	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 10.1K	GitHub Stars 41.5K
GitHub Forks 730	GitHub Forks 2.7K
Stacks 1.7K	Stacks 28.2K
Followers 1.3K	Followers 13.5K
Votes 396	Votes 151
Pros & Cons
Pros 121 Lightning-fast scaffolding 83 Automation 78 Great build process 57 Open source 49 Yo Cons 1 Even harder to debug than Javascript	Pros 85 Incredibly fast 22 Easy to use 13 Open Source 11 Can install any npm package 8 Works where npm fails Cons 16 Facebook 7 Sends data to facebook 4 Should be installed separately 3 Cannot publish to registry other than npm
Integrations
Bower Grunt	JavaScript npm

What are some alternatives to Yeoman, Yarn?

npm

npm is the command-line interface to the npm ecosystem. It is battle-tested, surprisingly flexible, and used by hundreds of thousands of JavaScript developers every day.

RequireJS

RequireJS loads plain JavaScript files as well as more defined modules. It is optimized for in-browser use, including in a Web Worker, but it can be used in other JavaScript environments, like Rhino and Node. It implements the Asynchronous Module API. Using a modular script loader like RequireJS will improve the speed and quality of your code.

Browserify

Browserify lets you require('modules') in the browser by bundling up all of your dependencies.

Component

Component's philosophy is the UNIX philosophy of the web - to create a platform for small, reusable components that consist of JS, CSS, HTML, images, fonts, etc. With its well-defined specs, using Component means not worrying about most frontend problems such as package management, publishing components to a registry, or creating a custom build process for every single app.

Verdaccio

A simple, zero-config-required local private npm registry. Comes out of the box with its own tiny database, and the ability to proxy other registries (eg. npmjs.org), caching the downloaded modules along the way.

pip

It is the package installer for Python. You can use pip to install packages from the Python Package Index and other indexes.

Duo

Duo is a next-generation package manager that blends the best ideas from Component, Browserify and Go to make organizing and writing front-end code quick and painless.

Lineman

Lineman is a command-line utility that is hyper-focused on helping web developers build first-class JavaScript web applications. Lineman provides a thin wrapper around a number of client-side productivity tools (primarily Express, Grunt, and Testem), with the goal of helping developers focus on writing awesome web apps instead of worrying about workflow configuration.

Pika.dev

It is a new kind of package registry for the modern web. It handles formatting, configuring, building and publishing every package on the registry, so that individual authors don't have to.

Bundler

It provides a consistent environment for Ruby projects by tracking and installing the exact gems and versions that are needed. It is an exit from dependency hell, and ensures that the gems you need are present in development, staging, and production.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana

Yarn vs Yeoman: What are the differences?

Introduction: In this Markdown code snippet, we will outline key differences between Yarn and Yeoman.

Package Management vs. Project Scaffolding: Yarn is primarily a package manager used for dependency management in Node.js projects, while Yeoman is a scaffolding tool that helps developers quickly set up project structures with predefined templates and generators.
Installation Process: Yarn is installed via npm and is specific to managing packages, whereas Yeoman requires a separate installation process and is focused on generating project structures rather than package management.
Usage Scope: Yarn is mainly used during development to manage packages and dependencies within a project, ensuring consistency and reliability. On the other hand, Yeoman is used at the initial stage of project setup to create a foundation for the development environment.
Customization Capabilities: Yarn provides limited customization options compared to Yeoman, which allows for extensive customization through the use of generators and templates. Developers can tailor project structures and workflows to their specific needs using Yeoman.
Community Support and Ecosystem: Yarn has a large user base and support within the Node.js community, focusing on package management best practices. Yeoman, on the other hand, has a smaller but dedicated community that contributes generators and templates for various project types and frameworks.
Maintenance and Updates: Yarn is regularly updated with bug fixes and feature enhancements related to package management, while Yeoman updates are more focused on maintaining compatibility with new technologies and frameworks, adding new generators, and improving overall user experience.

In Summary, Yarn and Yeoman serve different purposes in the development workflow, with Yarn focusing on package management and Yeoman specializing in project scaffolding and structure setup.