Alternatives to Animate.css  logo

Alternatives to Animate.css

JavaScript, Bootstrap, Sass, Material Design for Angular, and Less are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Animate.css .
9.2K
1.4K
+ 1
0

What is Animate.css and what are its top alternatives?

It is a bunch of cool, fun, and cross-browser animations for you to use in your projects. Great for emphasis, home pages, sliders, and general just-add-water-awesomeness.
Animate.css is a tool in the Front-End Frameworks category of a tech stack.
Animate.css is an open source tool with 72.9K GitHub stars and 16K GitHub forks. Here’s a link to Animate.css 's open source repository on GitHub

Top Alternatives to Animate.css

  • JavaScript

    JavaScript

    JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles. ...

  • Bootstrap

    Bootstrap

    Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web. ...

  • Sass

    Sass

    Sass is an extension of CSS3, adding nested rules, variables, mixins, selector inheritance, and more. It's translated to well-formatted, standard CSS using the command line tool or a web-framework plugin. ...

  • Material Design for Angular

    Material Design for Angular

    Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs. ...

  • Less

    Less

    Less is a CSS pre-processor, meaning that it extends the CSS language, adding features that allow variables, mixins, functions and many other techniques that allow you to make CSS that is more maintainable, themable and extendable. ...

  • Material-UI

    Material-UI

    MUI (formerly Material-UI) is the React UI library you always wanted. Follow your own design system, or start with Material Design. ...

  • Nuxt.js

    Nuxt.js

    Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more. ...

  • Foundation

    Foundation

    Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices. ...

Animate.css alternatives & related posts

JavaScript logo

JavaScript

224.3K
173.7K
7.8K
Lightweight, interpreted, object-oriented language with first-class functions
224.3K
173.7K
+ 1
7.8K
PROS OF JAVASCRIPT
  • 1.6K
    Can be used on frontend/backend
  • 1.5K
    It's everywhere
  • 1.1K
    Lots of great frameworks
  • 887
    Fast
  • 736
    Light weight
  • 416
    Flexible
  • 383
    You can't get a device today that doesn't run js
  • 284
    Non-blocking i/o
  • 233
    Ubiquitousness
  • 188
    Expressive
  • 51
    Extended functionality to web pages
  • 44
    Relatively easy language
  • 42
    Executed on the client side
  • 26
    Relatively fast to the end user
  • 22
    Pure Javascript
  • 17
    Functional programming
  • 11
    Async
  • 8
    Setup is easy
  • 7
    Because I love functions
  • 7
    JavaScript is the New PHP
  • 7
    Like it or not, JS is part of the web standard
  • 7
    Its everywhere
  • 7
    Full-stack
  • 6
    Expansive community
  • 6
    Future Language of The Web
  • 6
    Can be used in backend, frontend and DB
  • 5
    Evolution of C
  • 5
    Everyone use it
  • 5
    Love-hate relationship
  • 5
    Easy to hire developers
  • 5
    Supports lambdas and closures
  • 5
    Agile, packages simple to use
  • 5
    Popularized Class-Less Architecture & Lambdas
  • 5
    For the good parts
  • 4
    Everywhere
  • 4
    Hard not to use
  • 4
    Promise relationship
  • 4
    Scope manipulation
  • 4
    It's fun
  • 4
    Client processing
  • 4
    Nice
  • 4
    Easy to make something
  • 4
    Can be used on frontend/backend/Mobile/create PRO Ui
  • 4
    Easy
  • 4
    Photoshop has 3 JS runtimes built in
  • 4
    Can be used both as frontend and backend as well
  • 4
    Most Popular Language in the World
  • 4
    It let's me use Babel & Typescript
  • 4
    What to add
  • 4
    Clojurescript
  • 4
    Function expressions are useful for callbacks
  • 4
    No need to use PHP
  • 4
    Its fun and fast
  • 4
    Powerful
  • 4
    Versitile
  • 4
    Client side JS uses the visitors CPU to save Server Res
  • 4
    1.6K Can be used on frontend/backend
  • 4
    Stockholm Syndrome
  • 3
    Because it is so simple and lightweight
  • 3
    Only Programming language on browser
  • 2
    JavaScript j.s
  • 2
    Acoperișul 0757604335
CONS OF JAVASCRIPT
  • 21
    A constant moving target, too much churn
  • 20
    Horribly inconsistent
  • 14
    Javascript is the New PHP
  • 8
    No ability to monitor memory utilitization
  • 6
    Shows Zero output in case of ANY error
  • 5
    Can be ugly
  • 4
    Thinks strange results are better than errors
  • 2
    No GitHub
  • 1
    Slow

related JavaScript posts

Zach Holman

Oof. I have truly hated JavaScript for a long time. Like, for over twenty years now. Like, since the Clinton administration. It's always been a nightmare to deal with all of the aspects of that silly language.

But wowza, things have changed. Tooling is just way, way better. I'm primarily web-oriented, and using React and Apollo together the past few years really opened my eyes to building rich apps. And I deeply apologize for using the phrase rich apps; I don't think I've ever said such Enterprisey words before.

But yeah, things are different now. I still love Rails, and still use it for a lot of apps I build. But it's that silly rich apps phrase that's the problem. Users have way more comprehensive expectations than they did even five years ago, and the JS community does a good job at building tools and tech that tackle the problems of making heavy, complicated UI and frontend work.

Obviously there's a lot of things happening here, so just saying "JavaScript isn't terrible" might encompass a huge amount of libraries and frameworks. But if you're like me, yeah, give things another shot- I'm somehow not hating on JavaScript anymore and... gulp... I kinda love it.

See more
Conor Myhrvold
Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 39 upvotes · 4.2M views

How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

(GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

See more
Bootstrap logo

Bootstrap

52.9K
11.8K
7.6K
Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions
52.9K
11.8K
+ 1
7.6K
PROS OF BOOTSTRAP
  • 1.6K
    Responsiveness
  • 1.2K
    UI components
  • 943
    Consistent
  • 778
    Great docs
  • 677
    Flexible
  • 466
    HTML, CSS, and JS framework
  • 411
    Open source
  • 375
    Widely used
  • 368
    Customizable
  • 241
    HTML framework
  • 76
    Popular
  • 76
    Easy setup
  • 75
    Mobile first
  • 56
    Great grid system
  • 50
    Great community
  • 38
    Future compatibility
  • 34
    Integration
  • 28
    Very powerful foundational front-end framework
  • 24
    Standard
  • 23
    Javascript plugins
  • 19
    Build faster prototypes
  • 18
    Preprocessors
  • 14
    Grids
  • 8
    Clean
  • 7
    Good for a person who hates CSS
  • 4
    Easy to setup and learn
  • 4
    Rapid development
  • 4
    Love it
  • 3
    Great and easy to use
  • 2
    Great and easy
  • 2
    Provide angular wrapper
  • 2
    Community
  • 2
    Powerful grid system, Rapid development, Customization
  • 2
    Popularity
  • 2
    Great customer support
  • 2
    Clean and quick frontend development
  • 2
    Easy to use
  • 2
    Great and easy to make a responsive website
  • 2
    Sprzedam opla
  • 1
    Material-ui
  • 1
    Geo
  • 1
    It's fast
  • 1
    Boostrap
  • 1
    Pre-Defined components
  • 1
    Not tied to jQuery
  • 1
    Responsive design
  • 1
    Design Agnostic
  • 1
    Recognizable
  • 1
    Intuitive
  • 1
    Love the classes?
  • 1
    Reactjs
  • 1
    Felxible, comfortable, user-friendly
  • 1
    The fame
  • 1
    Easy setup2
  • 1
    Painless front end development
  • 1
    So clean and simple
  • 1
    Numerous components
  • 0
    Frefsd
CONS OF BOOTSTRAP
  • 25
    Javascript is tied to jquery
  • 16
    Every site uses the defaults
  • 15
    Grid system break points aren't ideal
  • 14
    Too much heavy decoration in default look
  • 8
    Verbose styles
  • 1
    Super heavy

related Bootstrap posts

Ganesa Vijayakumar
Full Stack Coder | Module Lead · | 19 upvotes · 2.5M views

I'm planning to create a web application and also a mobile application to provide a very good shopping experience to the end customers. Shortly, my application will be aggregate the product details from difference sources and giving a clear picture to the user that when and where to buy that product with best in Quality and cost.

I have planned to develop this in many milestones for adding N number of features and I have picked my first part to complete the core part (aggregate the product details from different sources).

As per my work experience and knowledge, I have chosen the followings stacks to this mission.

UI: I would like to develop this application using React, React Router and React Native since I'm a little bit familiar on this and also most importantly these will help on developing both web and mobile apps. In addition, I'm gonna use the stacks JavaScript, jQuery, jQuery UI, jQuery Mobile, Bootstrap wherever required.

Service: I have planned to use Java as the main business layer language as I have 7+ years of experience on this I believe I can do better work using Java than other languages. In addition, I'm thinking to use the stacks Node.js.

Database and ORM: I'm gonna pick MySQL as DB and Hibernate as ORM since I have a piece of good knowledge and also work experience on this combination.

Search Engine: I need to deal with a large amount of product data and it's in-detailed info to provide enough details to end user at the same time I need to focus on the performance area too. so I have decided to use Solr as a search engine for product search and suggestions. In addition, I'm thinking to replace Solr by Elasticsearch once explored/reviewed enough about Elasticsearch.

Host: As of now, my plan to complete the application with decent features first and deploy it in a free hosting environment like Docker and Heroku and then once it is stable then I have planned to use the AWS products Amazon S3, EC2, Amazon RDS and Amazon Route 53. I'm not sure about Microsoft Azure that what is the specialty in it than Heroku and Amazon EC2 Container Service. Anyhow, I will do explore these once again and pick the best suite one for my requirement once I reached this level.

Build and Repositories: I have decided to choose Apache Maven and Git as these are my favorites and also so popular on respectively build and repositories.

Additional Utilities :) - I would like to choose Codacy for code review as their Startup plan will be very helpful to this application. I'm already experienced with Google CheckStyle and SonarQube even I'm looking something on Codacy.

Happy Coding! Suggestions are welcome! :)

Thanks, Ganesa

See more
Francisco Quintero
Tech Lead at Dev As Pros · | 13 upvotes · 786.7K views

For Etom, a side project. We wanted to test an idea for a future and bigger project.

What Etom does is searching places. Right now, it leverages the Google Maps API. For that, we found a React component that makes this integration easy because using Google Maps API is not possible via normal API requests.

You kind of need a map to work as a proxy between the software and Google Maps API.

We hate configuration(coming from Rails world) so also decided to use Create React App because setting up a React app, with all the toys, it's a hard job.

Thanks to all the people behind Create React App it's easier to start any React application.

We also chose a module called Reactstrap which is Bootstrap UI in React components.

An important thing in this side project(and in the bigger project plan) is to measure visitor through out the app. For that we researched and found that Keen was a good choice(very good free tier limits) and also it is very simple to setup and real simple to send data to

Slack and Trello are our defaults tools to comunicate ideas and discuss topics, so, no brainer using them as well for this project.

See more
Sass logo

Sass

30.9K
22.2K
3K
Syntactically Awesome Style Sheets
30.9K
22.2K
+ 1
3K
PROS OF SASS
  • 608
    Variables
  • 593
    Mixins
  • 467
    Nested rules
  • 411
    Maintainable
  • 299
    Functions
  • 150
    Modular flexible code
  • 141
    Open source
  • 112
    Selector inheritance
  • 107
    Dynamic
  • 96
    Better than cs
  • 4
    Used by Bootstrap
  • 2
    If and for function
  • 1
    Better than less
  • 1
    Inheritance (@extend)
  • 1
    Custom functions
CONS OF SASS
  • 1
    Needs to be compiled

related Sass posts

Islam Diab
Full-stack Developer at Freelancer · | 9 upvotes · 25.3K views

Hi, I want to start freelancing, I have two years of experience in web development, and my skills in web development: HTML CSS JavaScript [basic, Object-Oriented Programming, Document object model, and browser object model] jQuery Bootstrap 3, 4 Pre-processor -> Sass Template Engine with Pug.js Task Runner with Gulp.js and Webpack Ajax JSON JavaScript Unit testing with jest framework Vue.js

Node.js [Just basic]

My Skills in Back end development Php [Basic, and Object-Oriented Programming] Database management system with MySql for database relationships and MongoDB for database non-relationships architecture pattern with MVC concept concept of SOLID Unit testing with PHPUnit Restful API

Laravel Framework

and version control with GitHub ultimately, I want to start working as a freelancer full time. Thanks.

See more

ReactQL is a React + GraphQL front-end starter kit. #JSX is a natural way to think about building UI, and it renders to pure #HTML in the browser and on the server, making it trivial to build server-rendered Single Page Apps. GraphQL via Apollo was chosen for the data layer; #GraphQL makes it simple to request just the data your app needs, and #Apollo takes care of communicating with your API (written in any language; doesn't have to be JavaScript!), caching, and rendering to #React.

ReactQL is written in TypeScript to provide full types/Intellisense, and pick up hard-to-diagnose goofs that might later show up at runtime. React makes heavy use of Webpack 4 to handle transforming your code to an optimised client-side bundle, and in throws back just enough code needed for the initial render, while seamlessly handling import statements asynchronously as needed, making the payload your user downloads ultimately much smaller than trying to do it by hand.

React Helmet was chosen to handle <head> content, because it works universally, making it easy to throw back the correct <title> and other tags on the initial render, as well as inject new tags for subsequent client-side views.

styled-components, Sass, Less and PostCSS were added to give developers a choice of whether to build styles purely in React / JavaScript, or whether to defer to a #css #preprocessor. This is especially useful for interop with UI frameworks like Bootstrap, Semantic UI, Foundation, etc - ReactQL lets you mix and match #css and renders to both a static .css file during bundling as well as generates per-page <style> tags when using #StyledComponents.

React Router handles routing, because it works both on the server and in the client. ReactQL customises it further by capturing non-200 responses on the server, redirecting or throwing back custom 404 pages as needed.

Koa is the web server that handles all incoming HTTP requests, because it's fast (TTFB < 5ms, even after fully rendering React), and its natively #async, making it easy to async/await inside routes and middleware.

See more
Material Design for Angular logo

Material Design for Angular

8.3K
6.5K
520
Material Design for AngularJS Apps
8.3K
6.5K
+ 1
520
PROS OF MATERIAL DESIGN FOR ANGULAR
  • 119
    Ui components
  • 62
    Backed by google
  • 51
    Backed by angular
  • 51
    Free
  • 48
    Javascript
  • 34
    Open source
  • 32
    Responsiveness
  • 31
    Easy to learn
  • 28
    Quick to develop
  • 20
    Customizable
  • 8
    Easy to start
  • 8
    Powerful
  • 6
    Themes
  • 6
    Flexible
  • 4
    Flexbox Layouts
  • 3
    Great community
  • 3
    I like its design
  • 2
    Great extensions
  • 1
    CDK
  • 1
    Consistents
  • 1
    It's the best looking out of the box
  • 1
    Seamless integration with AngularJS but lack of docs
  • 0
    Progressive Web Apps - to learn
CONS OF MATERIAL DESIGN FOR ANGULAR
  • 4
    No practical examples

related Material Design for Angular posts

Less logo

Less

2K
1.1K
931
The dynamic stylesheet language
2K
1.1K
+ 1
931
PROS OF LESS
  • 215
    Better than css
  • 177
    Variables
  • 141
    Mixins
  • 99
    Maintainable
  • 79
    Used by bootstrap
  • 56
    Open source
  • 51
    Extendable
  • 43
    Functions
  • 39
    Dynamic
  • 30
    Fast
  • 1
    CSS is valid LESS, very easy to pick up
CONS OF LESS
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Less posts

    ReactQL is a React + GraphQL front-end starter kit. #JSX is a natural way to think about building UI, and it renders to pure #HTML in the browser and on the server, making it trivial to build server-rendered Single Page Apps. GraphQL via Apollo was chosen for the data layer; #GraphQL makes it simple to request just the data your app needs, and #Apollo takes care of communicating with your API (written in any language; doesn't have to be JavaScript!), caching, and rendering to #React.

    ReactQL is written in TypeScript to provide full types/Intellisense, and pick up hard-to-diagnose goofs that might later show up at runtime. React makes heavy use of Webpack 4 to handle transforming your code to an optimised client-side bundle, and in throws back just enough code needed for the initial render, while seamlessly handling import statements asynchronously as needed, making the payload your user downloads ultimately much smaller than trying to do it by hand.

    React Helmet was chosen to handle <head> content, because it works universally, making it easy to throw back the correct <title> and other tags on the initial render, as well as inject new tags for subsequent client-side views.

    styled-components, Sass, Less and PostCSS were added to give developers a choice of whether to build styles purely in React / JavaScript, or whether to defer to a #css #preprocessor. This is especially useful for interop with UI frameworks like Bootstrap, Semantic UI, Foundation, etc - ReactQL lets you mix and match #css and renders to both a static .css file during bundling as well as generates per-page <style> tags when using #StyledComponents.

    React Router handles routing, because it works both on the server and in the client. ReactQL customises it further by capturing non-200 responses on the server, redirecting or throwing back custom 404 pages as needed.

    Koa is the web server that handles all incoming HTTP requests, because it's fast (TTFB < 5ms, even after fully rendering React), and its natively #async, making it easy to async/await inside routes and middleware.

    See more
    Julien DeFrance
    Principal Software Engineer at Tophatter · | 6 upvotes · 85.7K views
    Shared insights
    on
    BootstrapBootstrapLessLessSassSass
    at

    Which #GridFramework to use? My team and I closed on Bootstrap !

    On a related note and as far as stylesheets go, we had to chose between #CSS, #SCSS, #Sass , Less Finally opted for Sass

    As syntactically awesome as the name announces it.

    See more
    Material-UI logo

    Material-UI

    1.5K
    2.8K
    372
    The React UI library you always wanted.
    1.5K
    2.8K
    + 1
    372
    PROS OF MATERIAL-UI
    • 115
      React
    • 76
      Material Design
    • 48
      Ui components
    • 25
      CSS framework
    • 20
      Component
    • 12
      Looks great
    • 10
      Responsive
    • 10
      Good documentation
    • 9
      LESS
    • 7
      Open source
    • 6
      Code examples
    • 5
      Ui component
    • 5
      Flexible
    • 4
      JSS
    • 3
      Supports old browsers out of the box
    • 3
      Very accessible
    • 3
      Angular
    • 2
      LADO
    • 2
      Designed for Server Side Rendering
    • 2
      Fun
    • 2
      Interface
    • 1
      Easy to work with
    • 1
      Asdasd
    • 1
      Barev Arman
    • 0
      555
    CONS OF MATERIAL-UI
    • 27
      Hard to learn. Bad documentation
    • 22
      Hard to customize
    • 18
      Hard to understand Docs
    • 6
      Bad performance
    • 5
      Extra library needed for date/time pickers
    • 5
      For editable table component need to use material-table
    • 5
      Long Code

    related Material-UI posts

    Adebayo Akinlaja
    Engineering Manager at Andela · | 26 upvotes · 785.8K views

    I picked up an idea to develop and it was no brainer I had to go with React for the frontend. I was faced with challenges when it came to what component framework to use. I had worked extensively with Material-UI but I needed something different that would offer me wider range of well customized components (I became pretty slow at styling). I brought in Evergreen after several sampling and reads online but again, after several prototype development against Evergreen—since I was using TypeScript and I had to import custom Type, it felt exhaustive. After I validated Evergreen with the designs of the idea I was developing, I also noticed I might have to do a lot of styling. I later stumbled on Material Kit, the one specifically made for React . It was promising with beautifully crafted components, most of which fits into the designs pages I had on ground.

    A major problem of Material Kit for me is it isn't written in TypeScript and there isn't any plans to support its TypeScript version. I rolled up my sleeve and started converting their components to TypeScript and if you'll ask me, I am still on it.

    In summary, I used the Create React App with TypeScript support and I am spending some time converting Material Kit to TypeScript before I start developing against it. All of these components are going to be hosted on Bit.

    If you feel I am crazy or I have gotten something wrong, I'll be willing to listen to your opinion. Also, if you want to have a share of whatever TypeScript version of Material Kit I end up coming up with, let me know.

    See more

    My React website is a simple 5-pager that attaches to a database to store and display registrations and other data. The user (small user base) can change any form elements, but I don't need theme-ing, though that would be fun for the user. reactstrap/react-bootstrap built on Bootstrap 4 sounds dated. I am familiar with reactstrap, but a friend said to try Material-UI. The thought of learning it is interesting, but somehow I think it might be overkill. So... reactstrap, react-bootstrap, or Material UI, which should I use?

    See more
    Nuxt.js logo

    Nuxt.js

    1.3K
    1.2K
    278
    The Vue.js Framework
    1.3K
    1.2K
    + 1
    278
    PROS OF NUXT.JS
    • 42
      SSR
    • 37
      Automatic routes
    • 25
      Middleware
    • 22
      Hot code reloading
    • 18
      Easy setup, easy to use, great community, FRENCH TOUCH
    • 17
      SPA
    • 17
      Static Websites
    • 15
      Plugins
    • 13
      Code splitting for every page
    • 13
      Custom layouts
    • 11
      Automatic transpilation and bundling (with webpack and
    • 10
      Modules ecosystem
    • 9
      Easy setup
    • 7
      Vibrant and helpful community
    • 7
      Pages directory
    • 7
      Amazing Developer Experience
    • 6
      Not React
    • 2
      Its Great for Team Development
    CONS OF NUXT.JS
    • 3
      Still vue 2
    • 1
      Not React

    related Nuxt.js posts

    Simon Reymann
    Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 20 upvotes · 805K views

    Our whole Vue.js frontend stack (incl. SSR) consists of the following tools:

    • Nuxt.js consisting of Vue CLI, Vue Router, vuex, Webpack and Sass (Bundler for HTML5, CSS 3), Babel (Transpiler for JavaScript),
    • Vue Styleguidist as our style guide and pool of developed Vue.js components
    • Vuetify as Material Component Framework (for fast app development)
    • TypeScript as programming language
    • Apollo / GraphQL (incl. GraphiQL) for data access layer (https://apollo.vuejs.org/)
    • ESLint, TSLint and Prettier for coding style and code analyzes
    • Jest as testing framework
    • Google Fonts and Font Awesome for typography and icon toolkit
    • NativeScript-Vue for mobile development

    The main reason we have chosen Vue.js over React and AngularJS is related to the following artifacts:

    • Empowered HTML. Vue.js has many similar approaches with Angular. This helps to optimize HTML blocks handling with the use of different components.
    • Detailed documentation. Vue.js has very good documentation which can fasten learning curve for developers.
    • Adaptability. It provides a rapid switching period from other frameworks. It has similarities with Angular and React in terms of design and architecture.
    • Awesome integration. Vue.js can be used for both building single-page applications and more difficult web interfaces of apps. Smaller interactive parts can be easily integrated into the existing infrastructure with no negative effect on the entire system.
    • Large scaling. Vue.js can help to develop pretty large reusable templates.
    • Tiny size. Vue.js weights around 20KB keeping its speed and flexibility. It allows reaching much better performance in comparison to other frameworks.
    See more
    Giordanna De Gregoriis
    Jr Fullstack Developer at Stefanini Inspiring · | 8 upvotes · 81.5K views

    TL;DR: Shall I keep developing with Nuxt.js 2 and wait for a migration guide to Nuxt 3? Or start developing with Vue.js 3 using Vite, and then migrate to Nuxt 3 when it comes out?

    Long version: We have an old web application running on AngularJS and Bootstrap for frontend. It is mostly a user interface to easily read and post data to our engine.

    We want to redo this web application. Started from scratch using the newest version of Angular 2+ and Material Design for frontend. We haven't even finished rewriting half of the application and it is becoming dreadful to work on.

    • The cold start takes too much time
    • Every little change reload the whole page. Seconds to minutes of development lost looking at a loading blank page just changing css
    • Code maintainability is getting worse... again... as the application grows, since we must create everytime 5 files for a new page (html, component.ts, module.ts, scss, routing.ts)

    I'm currently trying to code a Proof of Concept using Nuxt.js and Tailwind CSS. But the thing is, Vue.js 3 is out and has interesting features such as the composition API, teleport and fragments. Also we wish to use the Vite frontend tooling, to improve our time developing regardless of our application size. It feels like a better alternative to Webpack, which is what Nuxt 2 uses.

    I'm already trying Nuxt.js with the nuxt-vite experimental module, but many nuxt modules are still incompatible from the time I'm posting this. It is also becoming cumbersome not being able to use teleport or fragments, but that can be circumvented with good components.

    What I'm asking is, what should be the wisest decision: keep developing with Nuxt 2 and wait for a migration guide to Nuxt 3? Or start developing with Vue.js 3 using Vite, and then migrate to Nuxt 3 when it comes out?

    See more
    Foundation logo

    Foundation

    1.2K
    1.1K
    735
    The most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world
    1.2K
    1.1K
    + 1
    735
    PROS OF FOUNDATION
    • 158
      Responsive grid
    • 92
      Mobile first
    • 79
      Open source
    • 75
      Semantic
    • 72
      Customizable
    • 51
      Quick to prototype
    • 50
      Simple ui
    • 45
      Fast
    • 44
      Best practices
    • 39
      Easy setup
    • 6
      Neutral style
    • 6
      HTML, SCSS and JS
    • 5
      Professional
    • 5
      Accessibility support
    • 3
      Xy grid
    • 2
      Every new version is smaller, smarter & more efficient
    • 2
      Sass
    • 1
      Robust
    CONS OF FOUNDATION
    • 4
      Awful site
    • 4
      Requires jQuery

    related Foundation posts

    ReactQL is a React + GraphQL front-end starter kit. #JSX is a natural way to think about building UI, and it renders to pure #HTML in the browser and on the server, making it trivial to build server-rendered Single Page Apps. GraphQL via Apollo was chosen for the data layer; #GraphQL makes it simple to request just the data your app needs, and #Apollo takes care of communicating with your API (written in any language; doesn't have to be JavaScript!), caching, and rendering to #React.

    ReactQL is written in TypeScript to provide full types/Intellisense, and pick up hard-to-diagnose goofs that might later show up at runtime. React makes heavy use of Webpack 4 to handle transforming your code to an optimised client-side bundle, and in throws back just enough code needed for the initial render, while seamlessly handling import statements asynchronously as needed, making the payload your user downloads ultimately much smaller than trying to do it by hand.

    React Helmet was chosen to handle <head> content, because it works universally, making it easy to throw back the correct <title> and other tags on the initial render, as well as inject new tags for subsequent client-side views.

    styled-components, Sass, Less and PostCSS were added to give developers a choice of whether to build styles purely in React / JavaScript, or whether to defer to a #css #preprocessor. This is especially useful for interop with UI frameworks like Bootstrap, Semantic UI, Foundation, etc - ReactQL lets you mix and match #css and renders to both a static .css file during bundling as well as generates per-page <style> tags when using #StyledComponents.

    React Router handles routing, because it works both on the server and in the client. ReactQL customises it further by capturing non-200 responses on the server, redirecting or throwing back custom 404 pages as needed.

    Koa is the web server that handles all incoming HTTP requests, because it's fast (TTFB < 5ms, even after fully rendering React), and its natively #async, making it easy to async/await inside routes and middleware.

    See more
    Shared insights
    on
    BootstrapBootstrapFoundationFoundation

    Should I go with Foundation CSS instead of Bootstrap? Or, if any other popular responsive frameworks are out there, please suggest them to me. My site mainly targets mobile or tablet

    See more