StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Log Management
  4. Log Management
  5. Apache Flume vs Scribe

Apache Flume vs Scribe

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache Flume
Apache Flume
Stacks48
Followers120
Votes0
Scribe
Scribe
Stacks36
Followers31
Votes0
GitHub Stars3.9K
Forks787

Apache Flume vs Scribe: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Apache Flume and Scribe. Both Apache Flume and Scribe are open-source distributed systems designed for collecting, aggregating, and moving large amounts of data from various sources to centralized storage or data processing systems. However, there are certain specific differences between the two that set them apart.

  1. Data ingestion model: Apache Flume is based on a push-based model, where data sources actively push data to the Flume agents for collection and processing. On the other hand, Scribe follows a pull-based model, where the central Scribe server pulls data from the clients.

  2. Architecture: Apache Flume follows a distributed architecture, where multiple agents function together in a hierarchical manner to collect and transfer data. It utilizes the concept of sources, channels, and sinks for data movement. Conversely, Scribe employs a centralized architecture, where all clients send their data to a central server, which then distributes the data to the desired destinations.

  3. Data buffering: Apache Flume provides built-in reliable data buffering with support for in-memory and on-disk buffering. This ensures data resilience and guarantees no data loss during high data throughput scenarios. Scribe, on the other hand, does not provide built-in data buffering capabilities by default. It relies on the client's ability to buffer data before sending it to the Scribe server.

  4. Scalability: Apache Flume is designed to be highly scalable, allowing users to easily add more agents to handle increasing data volumes. It can handle a wide range of data types and formats, making it suitable for large-scale data ingestion. While Scribe is also scalable, it is more suitable for smaller-scale applications due to its centralized architecture.

  5. Community support: Apache Flume is part of the Apache Software Foundation (ASF), which has a large and active community of developers and users. This ensures continuous development, bug fixes, and community support. Scribe, although it has a user base, does not have the same level of community support as Apache Flume.

  6. Integration capabilities: Apache Flume offers seamless integration with other Apache projects such as Apache Hadoop, Apache Spark, and Apache Kafka. This allows users to easily integrate Flume into existing data processing pipelines. Scribe, on the other hand, has limited integration capabilities and may require additional custom development to integrate with other systems.

In summary, Apache Flume and Scribe have key differences in their data ingestion models, architecture, data buffering capabilities, scalability, community support, and integration capabilities. These differences make them suitable for different use cases and environments.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Apache Flume
Apache Flume
Scribe
Scribe

It is a distributed, reliable, and available service for efficiently collecting, aggregating, and moving large amounts of log data. It has a simple and flexible architecture based on streaming data flows. It is robust and fault tolerant with tunable reliability mechanisms and many failover and recovery mechanisms. It uses a simple extensible data model that allows for online analytic application.

It is a server for aggregating log data streamed in real time from a large number of servers. It is designed to be scalable and reliable.

-
Aggregating log data ;Streamed in real time
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
3.9K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
787
Stacks
48
Stacks
36
Followers
120
Followers
31
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
No integrations available
Python
Python
Hadoop
Hadoop
Apache Thrift
Apache Thrift

What are some alternatives to Apache Flume, Scribe?

Papertrail

Papertrail

Papertrail helps detect, resolve, and avoid infrastructure problems using log messages. Papertrail's practicality comes from our own experience as sysadmins, developers, and entrepreneurs.

Logmatic

Logmatic

Get a clear overview of what is happening across your distributed environments, and spot the needle in the haystack in no time. Build dynamic analyses and identify improvements for your software, your user experience and your business.

Loggly

Loggly

It is a SaaS solution to manage your log data. There is nothing to install and updates are automatically applied to your Loggly subdomain.

Logentries

Logentries

Logentries makes machine-generated log data easily accessible to IT operations, development, and business analysis teams of all sizes. With the broadest platform support and an open API, Logentries brings the value of log-level data to any system, to any team member, and to a community of more than 25,000 worldwide users.

Logstash

Logstash

Logstash is a tool for managing events and logs. You can use it to collect logs, parse them, and store them for later use (like, for searching). If you store them in Elasticsearch, you can view and analyze them with Kibana.

Graylog

Graylog

Centralize and aggregate all your log files for 100% visibility. Use our powerful query language to search through terabytes of log data to discover and analyze important information.

Sematext

Sematext

Sematext pulls together performance monitoring, logs, user experience and synthetic monitoring that tools organizations need to troubleshoot performance issues faster.

Fluentd

Fluentd

Fluentd collects events from various data sources and writes them to files, RDBMS, NoSQL, IaaS, SaaS, Hadoop and so on. Fluentd helps you unify your logging infrastructure.

ELK

ELK

It is the acronym for three open source projects: Elasticsearch, Logstash, and Kibana. Elasticsearch is a search and analytics engine. Logstash is a server‑side data processing pipeline that ingests data from multiple sources simultaneously, transforms it, and then sends it to a "stash" like Elasticsearch. Kibana lets users visualize data with charts and graphs in Elasticsearch.

Sumo Logic

Sumo Logic

Cloud-based machine data analytics platform that enables companies to proactively identify availability and performance issues in their infrastructure, improve their security posture and enhance application rollouts. Companies using Sumo Logic reduce their mean-time-to-resolution by 50% and can save hundreds of thousands of dollars, annually. Customers include Netflix, Medallia, Orange, and GoGo Inflight.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana