Auth0 vs Keycloak

Overview

Auth0

Stacks1.4K

Followers2.1K

Votes215

Keycloak

Stacks780

Followers1.3K

Votes102

Auth0 vs Keycloak: What are the differences?

Auth0 and Keycloak are two well-known identity and access management (IAM) solutions. The following are the primary differences between Auth0 and Keycloak:

Deployment and Hosting: Auth0 is a cloud-based IAM platform that offers a fully managed service, providing ease of deployment and scalability. On the other hand, Keycloak is an open-source IAM solution that can be deployed on-premises or in a private cloud, allowing for more control over the hosting environment.
Configuration and Customization: Auth0 provides a user-friendly interface and extensive configuration options, making it easier to set up and customize authentication and authorization workflows. Keycloak, being an open-source solution, offers more flexibility and customization options, allowing developers to tailor the IAM system to their specific needs.
Integration and Ecosystem: Auth0 offers seamless integration with various external identity providers, social login platforms, and third-party services, making it convenient to integrate with existing systems. Keycloak, as an open-source solution, also supports integration with external providers but may require more development effort and customization.
Pricing and Licensing: Auth0's pricing approach is subscription-based, with multiple tiers based on the amount of active users and additional features. Keycloak is free to use and does not require any licencing fees because it is open-source. Organisations, on the other hand, may need to invest in infrastructure and resources for self-hosting and upkeep.
Support and Documentation: Auth0 provides dedicated customer support, documentation, and a comprehensive knowledge base to assist users with any issues or questions they may have. Keycloak, being community-driven, relies on community forums and documentation for support, with options for paid enterprise support from third-party vendors.

In summary, Auth0 offers a cloud-based IAM platform with easy deployment, configuration options, and extensive integration capabilities. It suits organizations looking for a managed IAM solution with strong support and a wide range of features. On the other hand, Keycloak is an open-source IAM solution providing flexibility, customization options, and cost-effectiveness.

🔥 Trending in Authentication on StackShare

Digital KYC & eSign Solutions Authentication

Digital KYC & eSign Solutions

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

0

1

Advice on Auth0, Keycloak

Vaibhav

Jul 17, 2020

Needs advice

Currently, Passport.js repo has 324 open issues, and Jared (the original author) seems to be the one doing most of the work. Also, given that the documentation is not proper. Is it worth using Passport.js?

As of now, StackShare shows it has 29 companies using it. How do you implement auth in your project or your company? Are there any good alternatives to Passport.js? Should I implement auth from scratch?

220k views220k

Comments

sindhujasrivastava

Jan 16, 2020

Needs advice

I am working on building a platform in my company that will provide a single sign on to all of the internal products to the customer. To do that we need to build an Authorisation server to comply with the OIDC protocol. Earlier we had built the Auth server using the Spring Security OAuth project but since in Spring Security 5.x it is no longer supported we are planning to get over with it as well. Below are the 2 options that I was considering to replace the Spring Auth Server.

Keycloak
Okta
Auth0 Please advise which one to use.

258k views258k

Comments

Brent

CEO at DEFY Labs

Mar 7, 2020

Decided

I started our team on Amazon Cognito because I was a Solutions Architect at AWS and found it really easy to follow the tutorials and get a basic app up and running with it.

When our team started working with it, they very quickly became frustrated because of the poor documentation. After 4 days of trying to get all the basic passwordless auth working, our lead engineer made the decision to abandon it and try Auth0... and managed to get everything implemented in 4 hours.

The consensus was that Cognito just isn't mature enough or well-documented, and that the implementation does not cater for real world use cases the way that it should. I believe Amplify has made some of this simpler, but I would still recommend Auth0 as it's been bulletproof for us, and is a sensible price.

296k views296k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Auth0	Keycloak
A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.	It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.
User and Password support with verification and forgot password email workflow; Painless SAML Auth with Enterprises; Integration with 20+ Social Providers; SDKs for all platforms mobile and web; Token-based authentication for APIs	-
Statistics
Stacks 1.4K	Stacks 780
Followers 2.1K	Followers 1.3K
Votes 215	Votes 102
Pros & Cons
Pros 70 JSON web token 31 Integration with 20+ Social Providers 20 It's a universal solution 20 SDKs 15 Amazing Documentation Cons 15 Pricing too high (Developer Pro) 7 Poor support 4 Rapidly changing API 4 Status page not reflect actual status	Pros 33 It's a open source solution 24 Supports multiple identity provider 17 OpenID and SAML support 12 Easy customisation 10 JSON web token Cons 7 Okta 6 Poor client side documentation 5 Lack of Code examples for client side
Integrations
Amazon S3 Salesforce Sales Cloud Parse Firebase Ruby PHP Laravel Python Java Spring	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Auth0, Keycloak?

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Kinde

Simple, powerful authentication that you can integrate in minutes. Free your users from passwords with secure and frictionless one click sign up and sign in. Built from the ground up using the best in class security protocols available today.

Satellizer

Satellizer is a simple to use, end-to-end, token-based authentication module for AngularJS with built-in support for Google, Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter authentication providers, plus Email and Password sign-in method. You are not limited to the sign-in options above, in fact you can add any OAuth 1.0 or OAuth 2.0 provider by passing provider-specific information during the configuration step.