StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. AWS CodeBuild vs Buildbot

AWS CodeBuild vs Buildbot

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Buildbot
Buildbot
Stacks73
Followers128
Votes27
GitHub Stars5.4K
Forks1.7K
AWS CodeBuild
AWS CodeBuild
Stacks443
Followers485
Votes43

AWS CodeBuild vs Buildbot: What are the differences?

## Introduction
When comparing AWS CodeBuild and Buildbot, it's important to understand the key differences between these two popular build automation tools.

1. **Hosting Environment**: AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS), which means that users can run their build jobs without having to manage servers or infrastructure. On the other hand, Buildbot is a self-hosted solution that requires users to set up and maintain their own build infrastructure and servers.

2. **Integration with AWS Services**: AWS CodeBuild seamlessly integrates with other AWS services such as CodePipeline, CodeCommit, and S3, allowing for a streamlined build and deployment process within the AWS ecosystem. In contrast, Buildbot does not have native integrations with AWS services and may require additional configurations or plugins to achieve similar functionality.

3. **Scalability and Flexibility**: AWS CodeBuild offers scalability by allowing users to easily scale their build capacity based on demand. It also supports a wide range of build environments and programming languages. Buildbot, while customizable and flexible, may require more manual configuration and setup to achieve similar levels of scalability and flexibility.

4. **Cost Structure**: AWS CodeBuild follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users are billed based on the number of build minutes consumed. This can be cost-effective for projects with fluctuating build requirements. Buildbot, being self-hosted, may involve upfront costs for infrastructure setup and maintenance, making it potentially less cost-effective for smaller projects or teams.

5. **Community Support and Documentation**: AWS CodeBuild benefits from being a popular AWS service with extensive documentation, support, and community resources available. Buildbot, while open source and community-driven, may have a smaller user base and fewer official resources, which could impact troubleshooting and support options for users.

6. **Continuous Deployment Capabilities**: AWS CodeBuild integrates seamlessly with AWS CodePipeline for setting up a continuous deployment workflow. This provides automation for releasing software changes to production environments. Buildbot, while capable of integrating with deployment tools, may require more manual configuration to achieve a similar level of continuous deployment automation.

In Summary, AWS CodeBuild and Buildbot differ in their hosting environment, integrations with AWS services, scalability, cost structure, community support, and continuous deployment capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Buildbot, AWS CodeBuild

Sri Srinivas
Sri Srinivas

Feb 11, 2020

Needs advice

I want to start automatic regressions for nightly builds and also continuous integration builds. The tests I ran are part of my regression suite. And I want to track the results of these tests.

I am able to do this with Jenkins using the Junit plugin. But, I am trying to do the same with Buildbot, and I am not able to get the report of the tests. So, I just want to know is it possible to get the reporting of tests through Buildbot. If yes, could anyone provide some examples

121k views121k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Buildbot
Buildbot
AWS CodeBuild
AWS CodeBuild

BuildBot is a system to automate the compile/test cycle required by most software projects to validate code changes. By automatically rebuilding and testing the tree each time something has changed, build problems are pinpointed quickly, before other developers are inconvenienced by the failure.

AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed build service that compiles source code, runs tests, and produces software packages that are ready to deploy. With CodeBuild, you don’t need to provision, manage, and scale your own build servers.

run builds on a variety of slave platforms;arbitrary build process: handles projects using C, Python, whatever;minimal host requirements: Python and Twisted;slaves can be behind a firewall if they can still do checkout;status delivery through web page, email, IRC, other protocols;track builds in progress, provide estimated completion time;flexible configuration by subclassing generic build process classes;debug tools to force a new build, submit fake Changes, query slave status;released under the GPL
Fully Managed Build Service;Continuous Scaling;Enables Continuous Integration;Integrates seamlessly with AWS services;FAQs: https://aws.amazon.com/codebuild/faqs/
Statistics
GitHub Stars
5.4K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.7K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
73
Stacks
443
Followers
128
Followers
485
Votes
27
Votes
43
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 9
    Highly configurable builds
  • 5
    Beautiful waterfall
  • 5
    Hosted internally
  • 4
    Free open source
  • 3
    Python
Pros
  • 7
    Pay per minute
  • 5
    Parameter Store integration for passing secrets
  • 4
    Integrated with AWS
  • 3
    Bit bucket integration
  • 3
    Streaming logs to Amazon CloudWatch
Cons
  • 2
    Poor branch support
Integrations
No integrations available
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS CodeCommit
AWS CodeCommit
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
GitHub
GitHub
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
AWS CloudFormation
AWS CloudFormation
Jenkins
Jenkins
GitHub Enterprise
GitHub Enterprise

What are some alternatives to Buildbot, AWS CodeBuild?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana