StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. AWS CodeBuild vs BuildMaster

AWS CodeBuild vs BuildMaster

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

BuildMaster
BuildMaster
Stacks6
Followers7
Votes0
AWS CodeBuild
AWS CodeBuild
Stacks443
Followers485
Votes43

AWS CodeBuild vs BuildMaster: What are the differences?

Key Differences between AWS CodeBuild and BuildMaster

  1. Deployment process: AWS CodeBuild is primarily a build automation service that compiles source code, runs tests, and produces artifacts ready for deployment. On the other hand, BuildMaster is a more comprehensive continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) tool that not only builds but also manages the entire application deployment process, including release pipelines, approvals, and environment management.

  2. Managed service vs. Self-hosted: AWS CodeBuild is a managed service provided by Amazon Web Services, which means users do not need to configure or maintain the build infrastructure. In contrast, BuildMaster is a self-hosted solution that requires installation and maintenance on the user's infrastructure, providing more control and customization options but also requiring more management overhead.

  3. Integration with other AWS Services: AWS CodeBuild seamlessly integrates with other AWS services such as AWS CodePipeline for orchestrating the entire CI/CD pipeline, Amazon S3 for artifact storage, and AWS Elastic Beanstalk for deployment. BuildMaster, while offering integrations with various tools and services, may not have the same level of native integration with AWS services out of the box.

  4. Scalability: AWS CodeBuild is highly scalable, allowing users to easily scale their build resources up or down based on demand. BuildMaster's scalability may be limited by the hardware and resources available on the self-hosted servers where it is installed.

  5. Pricing model: AWS CodeBuild follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model based on the compute resources used and build minutes consumed. BuildMaster, being self-hosted, may have a fixed cost associated with maintaining the infrastructure and licensing fees, which could be a consideration for organizations with budget constraints.

  6. Community support: AWS CodeBuild benefits from being part of the larger AWS ecosystem, with extensive documentation, community forums, and support resources. BuildMaster, while offering support options through its vendor, may not have the same breadth of community support available.

In Summary, AWS CodeBuild is a managed build automation service integrated with AWS services, while BuildMaster is a self-hosted CI/CD tool offering more control over the deployment process but with potential management overhead.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

BuildMaster
BuildMaster
AWS CodeBuild
AWS CodeBuild

It is a fully-functional Continuous Integration tool for a variety of platforms allowing your organization to start using CI/CD today, even with legacy applications. It runs automated testing for your applications and notify key team members if those tests fail.

AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed build service that compiles source code, runs tests, and produces software packages that are ready to deploy. With CodeBuild, you don’t need to provision, manage, and scale your own build servers.

Static Analysis & Reporting; Automated UI Tests;
Fully Managed Build Service;Continuous Scaling;Enables Continuous Integration;Integrates seamlessly with AWS services;FAQs: https://aws.amazon.com/codebuild/faqs/
Statistics
Stacks
6
Stacks
443
Followers
7
Followers
485
Votes
0
Votes
43
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 7
    Pay per minute
  • 5
    Parameter Store integration for passing secrets
  • 4
    Integrated with AWS
  • 3
    Bit bucket integration
  • 3
    Streaming logs to Amazon CloudWatch
Cons
  • 2
    Poor branch support
Integrations
Node.js
Node.js
.NET
.NET
Java
Java
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS CodeCommit
AWS CodeCommit
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
GitHub
GitHub
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
AWS CloudFormation
AWS CloudFormation
Jenkins
Jenkins
GitHub Enterprise
GitHub Enterprise

What are some alternatives to BuildMaster, AWS CodeBuild?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana