AWS CodeBuild vs TeamCity

Overview

TeamCity

Stacks1.2K

Followers1.1K

Votes316

AWS CodeBuild

Stacks443

Followers485

Votes43

AWS CodeBuild vs TeamCity: What are the differences?

Introduction

AWS CodeBuild and TeamCity are two popular tools used in the software development process for continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD). While both tools aim to automate the build, test, and deployment process, there are key differences that set them apart.

Scalability: AWS CodeBuild is designed to scale automatically based on the workload, allowing developers to build and test their applications quickly without worrying about infrastructure management. On the other hand, TeamCity requires manual configuration and management of build agents, limiting its scalability.
Pricing Model: AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed service in the cloud, which means that you only pay for the compute resources you use and there are no upfront costs or long-term commitments. TeamCity, on the other hand, requires you to set up and maintain your own servers, which can incur additional costs for hardware and infrastructure.
Integration with AWS Services: AWS CodeBuild seamlessly integrates with other AWS services such as CodeCommit, CodePipeline, and CodeDeploy, allowing for a streamlined CI/CD pipeline within the AWS ecosystem. TeamCity, on the other hand, requires additional configuration and plugins to integrate with AWS services.
Support for Multiple Programming Languages: AWS CodeBuild supports a wide range of programming languages and build tools out of the box, including popular frameworks such as Java, Python, Node.js, and Ruby. TeamCity also supports multiple programming languages, but may require additional configuration or plugins for certain languages.
Security and Compliance: With AWS CodeBuild, you can leverage AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) to manage user permissions and access controls, ensuring secure and compliant builds. TeamCity also offers security features, but may require additional configuration and setup for robust security measures.
Ease of Use: AWS CodeBuild provides a simple and intuitive interface, making it easy for developers to set up and manage their builds. TeamCity, while powerful, may have a steeper learning curve and require more configuration for newcomers.

In Summary, while both AWS CodeBuild and TeamCity are CI/CD tools, AWS CodeBuild offers automatic scalability, a flexible pricing model, seamless integration with AWS services, support for multiple programming languages, strong security and compliance features, and an easy-to-use interface, making it a compelling choice for many developers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

TeamCity	AWS CodeBuild
TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.	AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed build service that compiles source code, runs tests, and produces software packages that are ready to deploy. With CodeBuild, you don’t need to provision, manage, and scale your own build servers.
Automate code analyzing, compiling, and testing processes, with having instant feedback on build progress, problems, and test failures, all in a simple, intuitive web-interface; Simplified setup: create projects from just a VCS repository URL;Run multiple builds and tests under different configurations and platforms simultaneously; Make sure your team sustains an uninterrupted workflow with the help of Pretested commits and Personal builds; Have build history insight with customizable statistics on build duration, success rate, code quality, and custom metrics; Enable cost-effective on-demand build infrastructure scaling thanks to tight integration with Amazon EC2; Easily extend TeamCity functionality and add new integrations using Java API; Great visual project representation. Track any changes made by any user in the system, filter projects and choose style of visual change status representation;	Fully Managed Build Service;Continuous Scaling;Enables Continuous Integration;Integrates seamlessly with AWS services;FAQs: https://aws.amazon.com/codebuild/faqs/
Statistics
Stacks 1.2K	Stacks 443
Followers 1.1K	Followers 485
Votes 316	Votes 43
Pros & Cons
Pros 61 Easy to configure 37 Reliable and high-quality 32 On premise 32 User friendly 32 Github integration Cons 3 High costs for more than three build agents 2 Proprietary 2 User-friendly 2 User friendly	Pros 7 Pay per minute 5 Parameter Store integration for passing secrets 4 Integrated with AWS 3 Streaming logs to Amazon CloudWatch 3 Bit bucket integration Cons 2 Poor branch support
Integrations
Slack	AWS Elastic Beanstalk AWS CodeCommit Amazon S3 GitHub Bitbucket AWS CloudFormation Jenkins GitHub Enterprise

What are some alternatives to TeamCity, AWS CodeBuild?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Snap CI

Snap CI is a cloud-based continuous integration & continuous deployment tool with powerful deployment pipelines. Integrates seamlessly with GitHub and provides fast feedback so you can deploy with ease.

Related Comparisons

AWS CodeBuild vs TeamCity: What are the differences?

Introduction

Scalability: AWS CodeBuild is designed to scale automatically based on the workload, allowing developers to build and test their applications quickly without worrying about infrastructure management. On the other hand, TeamCity requires manual configuration and management of build agents, limiting its scalability.
Pricing Model: AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed service in the cloud, which means that you only pay for the compute resources you use and there are no upfront costs or long-term commitments. TeamCity, on the other hand, requires you to set up and maintain your own servers, which can incur additional costs for hardware and infrastructure.
Integration with AWS Services: AWS CodeBuild seamlessly integrates with other AWS services such as CodeCommit, CodePipeline, and CodeDeploy, allowing for a streamlined CI/CD pipeline within the AWS ecosystem. TeamCity, on the other hand, requires additional configuration and plugins to integrate with AWS services.
Support for Multiple Programming Languages: AWS CodeBuild supports a wide range of programming languages and build tools out of the box, including popular frameworks such as Java, Python, Node.js, and Ruby. TeamCity also supports multiple programming languages, but may require additional configuration or plugins for certain languages.
Security and Compliance: With AWS CodeBuild, you can leverage AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) to manage user permissions and access controls, ensuring secure and compliant builds. TeamCity also offers security features, but may require additional configuration and setup for robust security measures.
Ease of Use: AWS CodeBuild provides a simple and intuitive interface, making it easy for developers to set up and manage their builds. TeamCity, while powerful, may have a steeper learning curve and require more configuration for newcomers.

AWS CodeBuild vs TeamCity

Overview

AWS CodeBuild vs TeamCity: What are the differences?