StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. AWS CodeBuild vs Zuul CI

AWS CodeBuild vs Zuul CI

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

AWS CodeBuild
AWS CodeBuild
Stacks443
Followers485
Votes43
Zuul CI
Zuul CI
Stacks5
Followers21
Votes3

AWS CodeBuild vs Zuul CI: What are the differences?

<In this analysis, we will explore the key differences between AWS CodeBuild and Zuul CI.>

  1. Deployment Environment: AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed build service that supports a wide range of build environments, including Docker containers, while Zuul CI is primarily designed for testing and gating changes before deployment, with limited support for custom build environments.

  2. Integration with Other AWS Services: AWS CodeBuild seamlessly integrates with various AWS services such as CodeCommit, CodePipeline, and CodeDeploy, making it easier to set up a complete CI/CD pipeline within the AWS ecosystem. On the other hand, Zuul CI is more vendor-agnostic and does not offer direct integration with AWS services.

  3. Scalability and Flexibility: AWS CodeBuild can automatically scale up or down based on the load, making it a suitable choice for projects with fluctuating build demands. In contrast, Zuul CI, while highly customizable, might require manual intervention for scaling in certain scenarios.

  4. Community Support and Documentation: AWS CodeBuild benefits from extensive documentation and a large user base within the AWS community, providing resources for troubleshooting and getting started. Zuul CI, although supported by the OpenStack Foundation, may have a smaller community and fewer resources compared to AWS CodeBuild.

  5. Cost Structure: AWS CodeBuild follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users are charged based on the number of build minutes consumed and any additional resources used. Zuul CI, being an open-source platform, offers cost savings on licensing fees, but organizations may need to allocate resources for maintenance and support internally.

  6. Focus on Use Cases: AWS CodeBuild is geared towards handling the automated build process efficiently, with a focus on speed and reliability in a cloud-native environment. In contrast, Zuul CI is more suited for managing complex cross-project dependencies and intricate testing workflows in a distributed development environment.

In Summary, AWS CodeBuild excels in its integration with AWS services and scalability, while Zuul CI stands out in its flexibility for complex testing workflows and cost-effectiveness in open-source setups.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

AWS CodeBuild
AWS CodeBuild
Zuul CI
Zuul CI

AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed build service that compiles source code, runs tests, and produces software packages that are ready to deploy. With CodeBuild, you don’t need to provision, manage, and scale your own build servers.

It is an open source CI/CD platform specializing in gating changes across multiple systems and applications before landing a single patch.

Fully Managed Build Service;Continuous Scaling;Enables Continuous Integration;Integrates seamlessly with AWS services;FAQs: https://aws.amazon.com/codebuild/faqs/
Project Gating;CI/CD with Ansible;Cross-Project Dependencies
Statistics
Stacks
443
Stacks
5
Followers
485
Followers
21
Votes
43
Votes
3
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 7
    Pay per minute
  • 5
    Parameter Store integration for passing secrets
  • 4
    Integrated with AWS
  • 3
    Bit bucket integration
  • 3
    Streaming logs to Amazon CloudWatch
Cons
  • 2
    Poor branch support
Pros
  • 1
    Open-source Mostly used with Openstack
  • 1
    No vendor-lock In. Zero Cost
  • 1
    Hard to configure
Integrations
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS CodeCommit
AWS CodeCommit
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
GitHub
GitHub
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
AWS CloudFormation
AWS CloudFormation
Jenkins
Jenkins
GitHub Enterprise
GitHub Enterprise
Zookeeper
Zookeeper

What are some alternatives to AWS CodeBuild, Zuul CI?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana