AWS CodeCommit vs Gogs

Overview

Gogs

Stacks175

Followers306

Votes182

AWS CodeCommit

Stacks324

Followers826

Votes193

AWS CodeCommit vs Gogs: What are the differences?

Introduction:
AWS CodeCommit and Gogs are both version control services that help developers manage their source code repositories. However, there are key differences between the two platforms that make them unique in their own way.

1. **Hosting**: AWS CodeCommit is a fully managed service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS), while Gogs is a self-hosted platform that can be installed on-premises or on any cloud server. This means that AWS CodeCommit takes care of all the infrastructure and maintenance tasks, while Gogs requires users to manage the hosting environment themselves.

2. **Scalability**: AWS CodeCommit is designed to handle large-scale projects and can easily scale to accommodate growing teams and codebases. On the other hand, Gogs may struggle to provide the same level of scalability due to its self-hosted nature and potential resource limitations based on the server it is installed on.

3. **Integration with AWS Services**: AWS CodeCommit seamlessly integrates with other AWS services such as AWS CodeBuild, AWS CodePipeline, and AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM), making it easy for developers to build automated CI/CD pipelines and manage permissions. Gogs, being a standalone platform, may require additional configuration and setup to achieve similar levels of integration with external services.

4. **Support and Maintenance**: As a managed service, AWS CodeCommit receives regular updates, maintenance, and support from AWS, ensuring high availability, security, and performance. Gogs, being self-hosted, relies on community contributions and may require more effort from users to keep it up-to-date and secure.

5. **Cost**: AWS CodeCommit follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model based on the number of active users and repository storage, while Gogs is generally free to use with no licensing costs. This makes Gogs a cost-effective option for small teams or individual developers, whereas AWS CodeCommit may be more suitable for larger organizations with higher scalability and integration requirements.

6. **Ecosystem**: AWS CodeCommit is part of the larger AWS ecosystem, which provides developers with a wide range of cloud services and tools to streamline their development workflows. Gogs, on the other hand, has a smaller ecosystem but offers more flexibility in terms of customization and control over the platform.

In Summary, AWS CodeCommit and Gogs differ in hosting, scalability, integration with AWS services, support and maintenance, cost, and ecosystem, making them suitable for different use cases based on specific requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Gogs, AWS CodeCommit

Kavita

Dec 15, 2020

Needs adviceon

Bitbucket

Jenkins

Jira

Hi, I need advice. In my project, we are using Bitbucket hosted on-prem, Jenkins, and Jira. Also, we have restrictions not to use any plugins for code review, code quality, code security, etc., with bitbucket. Now we want to migrate to AWS CodeCommit, which would mean that we can use, let's say, Amazon CodeGuru for code reviews and move to AWS CodeBuild and AWS CodePipeline for build automation in the future rather than using Jenkins.

Now I want advice on below.

Is it a good idea to migrate from Bitbucket to AWS Codecommit?
If we want to integrate Jira with AWS Codecommit, then how can we do this? If a developer makes any changes in Jira, then a build should be triggered automatically in AWS and create a Jira ticket if the build fails. So, how can we achieve this?

581k views581k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Gogs	AWS CodeCommit
The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.	CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.
Activity timeline;SSH/HTTP(S) protocol support;SMTP/LDAP/reverse proxy authentication support;Register/delete/rename account;Create/migrate/mirror/delete/watch/rename/transfer public/private repository;Repository viewer/release/issue tracker/webhooks;Add/remove repository collaborators;Gravatar and cache support;Mail service(register, issue);Administration panel;Supports MySQL, PostgreSQL and SQLite3;Social account login(GitHub, Google, QQ, Weibo)	Collaboration;Encryption;Access Control;High Availability and Durability;Unlimited Repositories;Easy Access and Integration
Statistics
Stacks 175	Stacks 324
Followers 306	Followers 826
Votes 182	Votes 193
Pros & Cons
Pros 36 Self-hosted github like service 31 Very low memory footprint 29 Easy to install / update 17 Lightweight (low minimal req.) runs on Raspberry pi 16 Single binary deploy no dependencies	Pros 44 Free private repos 26 IAM integration 24 Pay-As-You-Go Pricing 20 Amazon feels the most Secure 19 Repo data encrypted at rest Cons 12 UI sucks 4 SLOW 3 No Issue Tracker 2 No webhooks 2 No fork
Integrations
No integrations available	Git Jenkins

What are some alternatives to Gogs, AWS CodeCommit?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.

Gitolite

Gitolite allows you to setup git hosting on a central server, with fine-grained access control and many more powerful features. Gitolite is an access control layer on top of git.

Related Comparisons

AWS CodeCommit vs Gogs: What are the differences?

Introduction:
AWS CodeCommit and Gogs are both version control services that help developers manage their source code repositories. However, there are key differences between the two platforms that make them unique in their own way.

1. **Hosting**: AWS CodeCommit is a fully managed service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS), while Gogs is a self-hosted platform that can be installed on-premises or on any cloud server. This means that AWS CodeCommit takes care of all the infrastructure and maintenance tasks, while Gogs requires users to manage the hosting environment themselves.

2. **Scalability**: AWS CodeCommit is designed to handle large-scale projects and can easily scale to accommodate growing teams and codebases. On the other hand, Gogs may struggle to provide the same level of scalability due to its self-hosted nature and potential resource limitations based on the server it is installed on.

3. **Integration with AWS Services**: AWS CodeCommit seamlessly integrates with other AWS services such as AWS CodeBuild, AWS CodePipeline, and AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM), making it easy for developers to build automated CI/CD pipelines and manage permissions. Gogs, being a standalone platform, may require additional configuration and setup to achieve similar levels of integration with external services.

4. **Support and Maintenance**: As a managed service, AWS CodeCommit receives regular updates, maintenance, and support from AWS, ensuring high availability, security, and performance. Gogs, being self-hosted, relies on community contributions and may require more effort from users to keep it up-to-date and secure.

5. **Cost**: AWS CodeCommit follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model based on the number of active users and repository storage, while Gogs is generally free to use with no licensing costs. This makes Gogs a cost-effective option for small teams or individual developers, whereas AWS CodeCommit may be more suitable for larger organizations with higher scalability and integration requirements.

6. **Ecosystem**: AWS CodeCommit is part of the larger AWS ecosystem, which provides developers with a wide range of cloud services and tools to streamline their development workflows. Gogs, on the other hand, has a smaller ecosystem but offers more flexibility in terms of customization and control over the platform.

AWS CodeCommit vs Gogs

Overview