StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. Azure Multi-Factor Authentication vs ORY Hydra

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication vs ORY Hydra

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

ORY Hydra
ORY Hydra
Stacks23
Followers157
Votes8
GitHub Stars16.6K
Forks1.6K
Azure Multi-Factor Authentication
Azure Multi-Factor Authentication
Stacks4
Followers12
Votes0

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication vs ORY Hydra: What are the differences?

Introduction

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication and ORY Hydra are two different authentication solutions commonly used in the industry. Despite having similar goals, they have some key differences that set them apart. Below are the key differences between Azure Multi-Factor Authentication and ORY Hydra.

1. Purpose and Scope:

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication focuses on providing an extra layer of security for user logins by requiring additional verification steps, such as SMS codes or biometric data. In contrast, ORY Hydra is an OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect provider that specializes in centralized authentication and authorization processes for APIs and web services.

2. Integration Flexibility:

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication is tightly integrated with Microsoft services, such as Azure Active Directory, making it a seamless choice for organizations heavily invested in the Microsoft ecosystem. On the other hand, ORY Hydra offers more flexibility in integration with various third-party identity providers and authentication services, making it a more versatile option for diverse environments.

3. Customization Options:

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication offers a set of predefined authentication methods and policies that organizations can choose from. In comparison, ORY Hydra allows for extensive customization through plugins, APIs, and configuration options, enabling organizations to tailor the authentication flow to their specific needs effectively.

4. Scalability and Performance:

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication is a cloud-based service provided by Microsoft, ensuring high uptime, scalability, and performance backed by Azure's infrastructure. On the other hand, ORY Hydra can be deployed on-premises or in the cloud, giving organizations more control over their infrastructure but potentially requiring additional resources for maintenance and scalability.

5. Licensing and Costs:

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication is typically included in Microsoft's enterprise licensing agreements or available as a standalone service with subscription-based pricing. ORY Hydra is an open-source project with no licensing costs, making it a cost-effective option for organizations looking to reduce their authentication infrastructure expenses.

6. Extensibility and Community Support:

ORY Hydra has a growing community of developers and contributors that continuously enhance the platform with new features, improvements, and integrations. In contrast, while Azure Multi-Factor Authentication benefits from Microsoft's resources and expertise, its extensibility may be limited to Microsoft's ecosystem and roadmap.

In Summary, the key differences between Azure Multi-Factor Authentication and ORY Hydra lie in their focus, integration flexibility, customization options, scalability and performance, licensing and costs, and extensibility and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

ORY Hydra
ORY Hydra
Azure Multi-Factor Authentication
Azure Multi-Factor Authentication

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

It helps safeguard access to data and applications while maintaining simplicity for users. It provides additional security by requiring a second form of authentication and delivers strong authentication via a range of easy to use authentication methods. Users may or may not be challenged for MFA based on configuration decisions that an administrator makes.

OAuth 2.0 Authorization Server;OpenID Connect certified;Flexible User Management;High Performance;Developer Friendly
Mobile app as a second factor; Phone call as a second factor; SMS as a second factor; Admin control over verification methods
Statistics
GitHub Stars
16.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.6K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
23
Stacks
4
Followers
157
Followers
12
Votes
8
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Open-source
  • 2
    Scalable
  • 2
    Fully customizable
No community feedback yet
Integrations
ORY Kratos
ORY Kratos
Docker
Docker
Node.js
Node.js
JavaScript
JavaScript
TypeScript
TypeScript
Golang
Golang
Ruby
Ruby
Python
Python
Java
Java
PHP
PHP
Azure Active Directory
Azure Active Directory
Microsoft 365
Microsoft 365

What are some alternatives to ORY Hydra, Azure Multi-Factor Authentication?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Let's Encrypt

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Sqreen

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Instant 2FA

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope