StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Azure Pipelines vs Github Actions

Azure Pipelines vs Github Actions

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Azure Pipelines
Azure Pipelines
Stacks2.3K
Followers457
Votes14
GitHub Actions
GitHub Actions
Stacks48.2K
Followers3.1K
Votes27

Azure Pipelines vs Github Actions: What are the differences?

  1. Pricing: Azure Pipelines and GitHub Actions have different pricing models. Azure Pipelines offers a free tier with limited resources and a paid tier with more resources and parallel jobs. GitHub Actions, on the other hand, offers a certain number of free minutes per month and charges additional fees for extra minutes.
  2. Integration with Azure Services: While both Azure Pipelines and GitHub Actions can be used for CI/CD workflows, Azure Pipelines has deeper integration with other Azure services. It provides built-in tasks for deploying to Azure App Service, Kubernetes, and other Azure resources, making it easier to work with the Azure ecosystem.
  3. Open Source Community: GitHub Actions has a larger open source community compared to Azure Pipelines. This means that there are more pre-built actions and workflows available on the GitHub Marketplace, making it easier to find and use existing solutions.
  4. Self-hosted Agents: Azure Pipelines supports self-hosted agents, which allows users to set up their own machines to run pipeline jobs. GitHub Actions, on the other hand, does not currently offer this feature, meaning that all jobs have to run on GitHub-hosted machines.

In summary, Azure Pipelines and GitHub Actions differ in their pricing models, integration with Azure services, support from open source community, and support for self-hosted agents.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Azure Pipelines, GitHub Actions

Somnath
Somnath

Engineering Leader at Altimetrik Corp.

Jun 25, 2020

Needs adviceonCircleCICircleCIDrone.ioDrone.ioGitHub ActionsGitHub Actions

I am in the process of evaluating CircleCI, Drone.io, and GitHub Actions to cover my #CI/ #CD needs. I would appreciate your advice on comparative study w.r.t. attributes like language-Inclusive support, code-base integration, performance, cost, maintenance, support, ease of use, ability to deal with big projects, etc. based on actual industry experience.

Thanks in advance!

1.82M views1.82M
Comments
Balaramesh
Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceonAzure PipelinesAzure Pipelines.NET.NETJenkinsJenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Azure Pipelines
Azure Pipelines
GitHub Actions
GitHub Actions

Fast builds with parallel jobs and test execution. Use container jobs to create consistent and reliable builds with the exact tools you need. Create new containers with ease and push them to any registry.

It makes it easy to automate all your software workflows, now with world-class CI/CD. Build, test, and deploy your code right from GitHub. Make code reviews, branch management, and issue triaging work the way you want.

Any language, any platform; Containers and Kubernetes; Extensible; Deploy to any cloud; Open source; Advanced workflows and features
Multiple workflow files support; Free and open source; Workflow run interface; Search for actions in GitHub Marketplace; Integrated with Github's Checks API; Logs and artifacts downloading support
Statistics
Stacks
2.3K
Stacks
48.2K
Followers
457
Followers
3.1K
Votes
14
Votes
27
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Easy to get started
  • 3
    Built by Microsoft
  • 3
    Unlimited CI/CD minutes
  • 2
    Docker support
  • 2
    Yaml support
Pros
  • 8
    Integration with GitHub
  • 5
    Free
  • 3
    Easy to duplicate a workflow
  • 3
    Ready actions in Marketplace
  • 2
    Docker Support
Cons
  • 5
    Lacking [skip ci]
  • 4
    Lacking allow failure
  • 3
    Lacking job specific badges
  • 2
    No ssh login to servers
  • 1
    No manual launch
Integrations
.NET Core
.NET Core
Slack
Slack
Python
Python
Ruby
Ruby
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
.NET
.NET
Node.js
Node.js
Linux
Linux
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
RxJava
RxJava
GitHub
GitHub

What are some alternatives to Azure Pipelines, GitHub Actions?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Airflow

Airflow

Use Airflow to author workflows as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) of tasks. The Airflow scheduler executes your tasks on an array of workers while following the specified dependencies. Rich command lines utilities makes performing complex surgeries on DAGs a snap. The rich user interface makes it easy to visualize pipelines running in production, monitor progress and troubleshoot issues when needed.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana