StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Bitbucket Pipelines vs Snap CI

Bitbucket Pipelines vs Snap CI

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Snap CI
Snap CI
Stacks29
Followers56
Votes100
Bitbucket Pipelines
Bitbucket Pipelines
Stacks350
Followers368
Votes0

Bitbucket Pipelines vs Snap CI: What are the differences?

  1. Integration with the REST API: Bitbucket Pipelines provide integration with the Bitbucket platform's REST API, allowing for enhanced automation and customization of pipelines. On the other hand, Snap CI lacks direct integration with a REST API, limiting its flexibility in integrating with external tools and services.

  2. Support for Docker Containerization: Bitbucket Pipelines offer native support for Docker containerization, enabling easy packaging and deploying of applications. Snap CI, on the other hand, has limited support for Docker, which can hinder the utilization of containerization benefits in the CI/CD process.

  3. Pipeline Configuration Complexity: Bitbucket Pipelines offer a simpler and more straightforward configuration setup compared to Snap CI, making it easier for teams to set up and manage their pipelines without extensive training or expertise. Snap CI, however, may require more configuration complexity and expertise to create and manage pipelines effectively.

  4. Scalability and Pricing: Bitbucket Pipelines have competitive pricing models and scalable options that cater to both small teams and large enterprises, providing cost-effective solutions for various needs. In contrast, Snap CI may have limited scalability options and pricing plans, limiting its suitability for businesses with fluctuating CI/CD demands.

  5. Native Integration with Bitbucket Repositories: Bitbucket Pipelines offer seamless integration with Bitbucket repositories, allowing for direct access and synchronization of code repositories with the CI/CD process. Snap CI may lack this direct integration, requiring additional setup and configuration steps to connect with Bitbucket repositories.

  6. Built-in Deployment Capabilities: Bitbucket Pipelines come with built-in deployment capabilities, enabling teams to easily deploy their applications to various environments directly from the pipeline. Snap CI may require additional tooling or configurations for deployment, adding complexity to the deployment process.

In Summary, Bitbucket Pipelines provide seamless integration with Bitbucket repositories, support for Docker containerization, and simpler pipeline configurations compared to Snap CI, which may have limitations in REST API integration, scalability, and deployment capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Snap CI
Snap CI
Bitbucket Pipelines
Bitbucket Pipelines

Snap CI is a cloud-based continuous integration & continuous deployment tool with powerful deployment pipelines. Integrates seamlessly with GitHub and provides fast feedback so you can deploy with ease.

It is an Integrated continuous integration and continuous deployment for Bitbucket Cloud that's trivial to set up, automating your code from test to production. Our mission is to enable all teams to ship software faster by driving the practice of continuous delivery.

Deployment Options - Heroku, AWS;System Libraries - Your build runs on a RedHat 6-compatible system with commonly required libraries;Customization Options - In addition to all that we support out of the box, we offer you the chance to customize your build extensively.;Multi-Stage Deployment Pipelines
Continuous integration and delivery; Map the branch structure; Run as service; Extend your workflow; Go multilingual with Docker; Use environment Variables; Skip the queue;
Statistics
Stacks
29
Stacks
350
Followers
56
Followers
368
Votes
100
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 14
    Github integration
  • 13
    Easy setup
  • 11
    Multi-stage pipelines
  • 10
    Continuous deployment
  • 9
    Easy ui
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Docker
Docker
Slack
Slack
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
GitHub
GitHub
Heroku
Heroku
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Snap CI, Bitbucket Pipelines?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana