Overview

Bitbucket

Stacks41.1K

Followers33.4K

Votes2.8K

Gitblit

Stacks18

Followers55

Votes4

Bitbucket vs Gitblit: What are the differences?

#### Key Differences between Bitbucket and Gitblit

1. **Code Hosting Capability**: Bitbucket is a cloud-based service provided by Atlassian that offers code hosting for Git repositories, whereas Gitblit is a lightweight, open-source web application for managing, viewing, and serving Git repositories over HTTP.
   
2. **Features and Integrations**: Bitbucket provides additional features like issue tracking, pull requests, and integration with JIRA, while Gitblit focuses more on the core functionalities of Git repository management without extensive integrations.

3. **Access Control and Permissions**: Bitbucket offers more advanced access control options, including user management, permissions at the repository and branch levels, and fine-grained permission settings. In contrast, Gitblit provides basic access control features with fewer customization options.

4. **User Interface and User Experience**: Bitbucket has a more modern and user-friendly interface with a rich set of features, making it easier for users to navigate and collaborate on projects. Gitblit, on the other hand, has a simpler interface designed for straightforward repository management.

5. **Support and Documentation**: Bitbucket has comprehensive documentation, support resources, and a large user base, making it easier to troubleshoot issues and get assistance. Gitblit's support and documentation are more limited, with a smaller community of users providing assistance and resources.

6. **Deployment Options**: Bitbucket offers a cloud-hosted solution as well as a self-hosted version, giving users flexibility in choosing their deployment options. Gitblit, on the other hand, is primarily intended for self-hosted deployments and lacks a cloud-hosted option.

In Summary, the key differences between Bitbucket and Gitblit lie in their code hosting capabilities, features, access control, user interface, support resources, and deployment options.

🔥 Trending in Code Collaboration on StackShare

Glide

Code Collaboration

AI-assisted technical design docs

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

0

8

Advice on Bitbucket, Gitblit

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

Pick the correct target branch
Make Drafts explicit
Name things properly
Ask help for tools
Remove the noise
Fetch necessary data
Understand Mergeability
Pass the message
Add screenshots
Be found in the future
Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 22, 2020

Review

One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.

It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.

1.1M views1.1M

Comments

Elmar

CEO, Managing Director at Wouters Media

Nov 9, 2020

Decided

I first used BitBucket because it had private repo's, and it didn't disappoint me. Also with the smooth integration of Jira, the decision to use BitBucket as a full application maintenance service was as easy as 1, 2, 3.

I honestly love BitBucket, by the looks, by the UI, and the smooth integration with Tower.

586k views586k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bitbucket	Gitblit
Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.	Gitblit is an open source, pure Java Git solution for managing, viewing, and serving Git repositories. It can serve repositories over the GIT, HTTP, and SSH transports; it can authenticate against multiple providers; and it allows you to get up-and-running with an attractive, capable Git server in less than 5 minutes.
Unlimited private repositories, charged per user;Best-in-class Jira integration;Built-in CI/CD;Deployment visibility;Embedded Trello boards; Command Instructions;Source Browser;Git Powered Wikis;Integrated Issue Tracking;Code reviews with inline comments;Compare View;Newsfeed;Followers;Developer Profiles;Autocompletion for @username mentions;Support for Mercurial	-
Statistics
Stacks 41.1K	Stacks 18
Followers 33.4K	Followers 55
Votes 2.8K	Votes 4
Pros & Cons
Pros 905 Free private repos 397 Simple setup 349 Nice ui and tools 342 Unlimited private repositories 240 Affordable git hosting Cons 19 Not much community activity 17 Difficult to review prs because of confusing ui 15 Quite buggy 10 Managed by enterprise Java company 8 CI tool is not free of charge	Pros 1 Easy to setup. Runs on OSX 1 Free 1 Better user & group management 1 Fast and fulfill just the features I need 0 Windows authentication is supported Cons 2 Confusing UI 0 No active development 0 Squash and Merge is not supported 0 No code review functionality 0 No Pull Requests
Integrations
Git AWS Cloud9 Sentry Microsoft Azure npm Trello Slack Confluence Docker Jira	Git

What are some alternatives to Bitbucket, Gitblit?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.