Bridgecrew vs Veracode: What are the differences?

Introduction: In the realm of security tools, Bridgecrew and Veracode are two prominent names. However, they differ in various aspects that make them suitable for different use cases.

1. Scope of Testing: Bridgecrew primarily focuses on infrastructure as code security, covering cloud security posture management, whereas Veracode specializes in application security testing, offering static, dynamic, and software composition analysis.
2. Integration and Automation: While both tools offer integrations with popular DevOps tools, Bridgecrew emphasizes automated security validation in CI/CD pipelines, providing native integrations with tools like Terraform, CloudFormation, and Kubernetes, whereas Veracode offers deep integrations with tools like Jenkins and GitLab for comprehensive application security testing.
3. Pricing Model: Bridgecrew typically offers a consumption-based pricing model, where users pay for the number of resources scanned, making it flexible for small to large-scale environments, whereas Veracode follows a more traditional licensing model based on users and application lines of code, which may be more suitable for organizations with predictable application sizes.
4. Target Audience: Bridgecrew caters to DevOps teams and cloud security professionals who are focused on securing cloud environments and infrastructure configurations, providing actionable insights and recommendations to improve security posture, while Veracode is more targeted towards developers, security professionals, and compliance teams looking to secure their applications and address software vulnerabilities.
5. Ease of Use: Bridgecrew offers a user-friendly, developer-centric platform with in-context remediation advice and integration with popular version control systems like GitHub, enabling quick and efficient security fixes, whereas Veracode provides comprehensive reports and dashboards for different types of security testing, catering to the needs of security analysts and compliance officers.
6. Compliance and Certifications: Veracode boasts a wide range of compliance certifications like SOC 2, ISO 27001, and HIPAA compliance, making it a preferred choice for organizations with stringent regulatory requirements, whereas Bridgecrew focuses more on cloud security standards like CIS Benchmarks and provides compliance automation for cloud infrastructure.

In Summary, Bridgecrew and Veracode offer distinct approaches to security testing, with Bridgecrew specializing in infrastructure as code security and automation for cloud environments, while Veracode excels in application security testing with a wide range of compliance certifications.