BrowserStack vs LambdaTest

Overview

BrowserStack

Stacks2.7K

Followers2.0K

Votes533

LambdaTest

Stacks556

Followers198

Votes204

BrowserStack vs LambdaTest: What are the differences?

In today's digital era, web testing plays a vital role. Two popular tools that assist in web testing are BrowserStack and LambdaTest. Let's explore the key differences between them.

Pricing and Plans: One of the key differences between BrowserStack and LambdaTest lies in their pricing and plans. BrowserStack provides a variety of plans, ranging from basic to enterprise, catering to different business needs. On the other hand, LambdaTest offers a more simplified pricing structure with a fixed pricing model based on the number of parallel tests and features required.
Device and Browser Coverage: BrowserStack boasts of an extensive device and browser coverage, including popular mobile devices and browsers, making it ideal for comprehensive cross-browser testing. LambdaTest also offers a wide range of device and browser options, but its coverage may be slightly limited compared to BrowserStack.
Automated Testing Capabilities: Both BrowserStack and LambdaTest provide automated testing capabilities, allowing users to run test scripts across different browsers and devices. However, BrowserStack offers advanced features such as AI-powered visual testing, making it easier to identify visual discrepancies, whereas LambdaTest focuses more on manual and automated testing with Selenium and other frameworks.
Collaboration and Integrations: BrowserStack provides robust collaboration features, allowing teams to collaborate, share test reports, and add annotations on screenshots. It also offers seamless integration with popular project management tools like Jira and Trello. LambdaTest also provides collaboration features, but its integrations may be more limited compared to BrowserStack.
Local Testing: BrowserStack offers a unique feature called Local Testing, which allows users to test websites or web applications hosted on their own local machine or private servers without the need for external access. This feature is particularly useful for testing internal or restricted web applications. LambdaTest, on the other hand, does not provide this specific local testing capability.
Scalability and Support: When it comes to scalability, BrowserStack offers a highly scalable infrastructure, enabling users to run tests in parallel on a large scale. Additionally, BrowserStack provides 24/7 customer support to assist users with their queries and technical issues. Likewise, LambdaTest offers scalable infrastructure, but its customer support may have slight variations compared to BrowserStack, with different support plans available.

In summary, BrowserStack offers a comprehensive solution with a vast array of real browsers and devices for testing web applications, while LambdaTest provides a scalable platform with features like parallel testing and integrations.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on BrowserStack, LambdaTest

Rinchin

Jul 20, 2020

Needs adviceon

Selenium

Sauce Labs

I am looking to purchase one of these tools for Mobile testing for my team. It should support Native, hybrid, and responsive app testing. It should also feature debugging, parallel execution, automation testing/easy integration with automation testing tools like Selenium, and the capability to provide availability of devices specifically for us to use at any time with good speed of performing all these activities.

I have already used Perfecto mobile, and Sauce Labs in my other projects before. I want to know how different or better is AWS Device farm in usage and how advantageous it would be for us to use it over other mentioned tools

217k views217k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

BrowserStack	LambdaTest
BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.	LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.
Get instant access to 20,000+ real mobile devices and browsers, which include real iOS and Android devices, Chrome, IE, Firefox, Safari; Test websites hosted on internal dev and staging environments with zero setup or configuration; Run hundreds of tests concurrently to speed up the execution time of your test suite by more than 10x	Selenium Web Automation; Cypress CLI; HyperExecute (70% faster then conventional selenium grid); Test at Scale; Customized Enterprise Solutions; Puppeteer Automation Testing; Playwright Automation Testing; TestCafe Automation Testing; Appium Automation Testing; Espresso Mobile App Testing; On Premise Selenium Grid; Real Time Browser Testing; Real Mobile App Testing; Local host web app testing; Automated Screenshot Generation; Smart Visual UI testing, Visual Regression Testing; Free Responsive testing with LT Browser;Smart Visual UI Testing;Testing Locally Hosted Pages: Lambda Tunnel;
Statistics
Stacks 2.7K	Stacks 556
Followers 2.0K	Followers 198
Votes 533	Votes 204
Pros & Cons
Pros 135 Multiple browsers 76 Ease of use 65 Real browsers 44 Ability to use it locally 27 Good price Cons 2 Very limited choice of minor versions	Pros 17 Pocket friendly pricing 13 Good Performance 12 Integration with Bitbucket 12 Cross browser testing 12 Integration with Gitlab Cons 1 Cluttered UI 1 Limited device support 1 Steep learning curve for new users
Integrations
Cypress QMetry Jira WordPress Shopify Zapier Drone.io Jenkins Slack GitLab	Zoho Bugtracker GitLab Katalon Studio RSpec Jira PractiTest AngularJS JUnit TestCafe Appium

What are some alternatives to BrowserStack, LambdaTest?

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

Testrail

TestRail helps you manage and track your software testing efforts and organize your QA department. Its intuitive web-based user interface makes it easy to create test cases, manage test runs and coordinate your entire testing process.

TestingBot

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Related Comparisons

BrowserStack vs LambdaTest: What are the differences?

In today's digital era, web testing plays a vital role. Two popular tools that assist in web testing are BrowserStack and LambdaTest. Let's explore the key differences between them.

Pricing and Plans: One of the key differences between BrowserStack and LambdaTest lies in their pricing and plans. BrowserStack provides a variety of plans, ranging from basic to enterprise, catering to different business needs. On the other hand, LambdaTest offers a more simplified pricing structure with a fixed pricing model based on the number of parallel tests and features required.
Device and Browser Coverage: BrowserStack boasts of an extensive device and browser coverage, including popular mobile devices and browsers, making it ideal for comprehensive cross-browser testing. LambdaTest also offers a wide range of device and browser options, but its coverage may be slightly limited compared to BrowserStack.
Automated Testing Capabilities: Both BrowserStack and LambdaTest provide automated testing capabilities, allowing users to run test scripts across different browsers and devices. However, BrowserStack offers advanced features such as AI-powered visual testing, making it easier to identify visual discrepancies, whereas LambdaTest focuses more on manual and automated testing with Selenium and other frameworks.
Collaboration and Integrations: BrowserStack provides robust collaboration features, allowing teams to collaborate, share test reports, and add annotations on screenshots. It also offers seamless integration with popular project management tools like Jira and Trello. LambdaTest also provides collaboration features, but its integrations may be more limited compared to BrowserStack.
Local Testing: BrowserStack offers a unique feature called Local Testing, which allows users to test websites or web applications hosted on their own local machine or private servers without the need for external access. This feature is particularly useful for testing internal or restricted web applications. LambdaTest, on the other hand, does not provide this specific local testing capability.
Scalability and Support: When it comes to scalability, BrowserStack offers a highly scalable infrastructure, enabling users to run tests in parallel on a large scale. Additionally, BrowserStack provides 24/7 customer support to assist users with their queries and technical issues. Likewise, LambdaTest offers scalable infrastructure, but its customer support may have slight variations compared to BrowserStack, with different support plans available.

BrowserStack vs LambdaTest

Overview