StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Messaging
  4. Communications SDK
  5. Chat by Stream vs SendBird

Chat by Stream vs SendBird

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

SendBird
SendBird
Stacks142
Followers405
Votes78
Chat by Stream
Chat by Stream
Stacks18
Followers54
Votes95

Chat by Stream vs SendBird: What are the differences?

Introduction:

1. Customizability: Stream's Chat API offers a high level of customization, allowing developers to tailor the chat experience to fit their app's branding and design. On the other hand, SendBird provides a more limited level of customization compared to Stream.

2. Scalability: Stream's infrastructure is optimized for scalability, ensuring that chat functionality can easily handle large volumes of users and messages. SendBird's scalability may face challenges when dealing with a high influx of users and messages, potentially leading to performance issues.

3. Documentation: Stream's documentation is comprehensive and well-organized, making it easier for developers to integrate chat functionality into their applications. In contrast, SendBird's documentation may be lacking in detail and clarity, leading to difficulties for developers during the integration process.

4. Pricing: Stream offers a competitive pricing structure with transparent pricing plans based on usage levels, making it easier for developers to understand and budget for chat services. SendBird's pricing may be more complex and less transparent, potentially leading to unexpected costs for developers.

5. Ease of Integration: Stream's Chat API is known for its ease of integration, providing clear guidelines and resources for developers to quickly implement chat functionality. SendBird may have a steeper learning curve and require more time and effort for successful integration into applications.

6. Community Support: Stream has a vibrant and active developer community, enabling developers to seek help, share knowledge, and collaborate with others on integrating chat features. In contrast, SendBird's community support may be limited, resulting in fewer resources and assistance for developers.

In Summary, Stream and SendBird differ in customizability, scalability, documentation, pricing, ease of integration, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

SendBird
SendBird
Chat by Stream
Chat by Stream

SendBird is a Messaging SDK, Chat API, and fully managed chat infrastructure for your mobile apps and websites. Embeddable chat for iOS, Android, JavaScript, Unity, .NET.

Chat API and SDK. With a beautiful UI Kit, easy to use React Components and powerful API. Add Chat to any application in a matter of hours. The tech uses Go, RocksDB and Raft. By the creators of Stream, the API that powers activity feeds for more than 300 million users.

In-app chat experiences users will love; Immersive voice and video experiences; Easy in-app chat support for your customers; Enterprise-ready compliance
Reactions;Threads & Replies; Presence/who is online;Fulltext search on chat messages;Messages states; Typing Indicators;Message history;Powerful query support for channels and users;AI based moderation for spam and profanity;User Roles;@mentions;User invites;Mute users;Ban users;Flag Messages;Custom Messages;React Components;Push notifications;Webhooks;Unread message counts;Multi Region support;GDPR compliancy tools;HIPAA ready;Custom Slack Style Slash commands;Highly available infrastructure with Raft replication;Giphy integration;Url enrichment;Video Playback; CDN integrated;Fast response time; On premise;Fully customizable;Powerful CLI;Unlimited message retention;99.999% uptime SLA; 24/7 phone support; SAML login; 2FA for developer accounts;Emoticons;File uploads via select, drag and drop and clipboard; React Native Components;
Statistics
Stacks
142
Stacks
18
Followers
405
Followers
54
Votes
78
Votes
95
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 13
    Active support is impressive. (Support for private deve
  • 10
    Easy to use
  • 10
    Pre-built UI for major platforms
  • 8
    Migration API for customers using other chat services
  • 7
    First chat SDK officially supports Xamarin
Cons
  • 2
    Policy on concurrent users leads to overages and overch
  • 2
    Prices ramp up exponentially
Pros
  • 15
    Reasonable Pricing
  • 14
    Threads
  • 13
    SDKs for React, RN, Android and iOS are better
  • 13
    Reactions
  • 13
    Very fast and scalable
Integrations
No integrations available
PHP
PHP
React Native
React Native
Python
Python
Ruby
Ruby
Swift
Swift
React
React
.NET
.NET
Java
Java

What are some alternatives to SendBird, Chat by Stream?

Sinch

Sinch

Sinch makes it easy for developers to add voice, messaging and SMS to their apps with just a few lines of code. Enrich your apps with communications that your users will love.

ChannelizeIO

ChannelizeIO

Add In-App User-to-User Communication into Mobile Apps & Websites, with rich & engaging Text Chat, Video, and Audio Calling experiences, to Increase User Engagement and Enable new Revenue Streams.

Agora

Agora

Agora.io provides building blocks for you to add real-time voice and video communications through a simple and powerful SDK. You can integrate the Agora SDK to enable real-time communications in your own application quickly.

OpenTok

OpenTok

It adds the clarity and emotion of face-to-face communication to your brand whether you're developing for the web, iOS, or Android. We make the integration of high-quality live video a breeze so that you can focus on building a great product.

QuickBlox

QuickBlox

Add powerful communication features to your mobile app and data services for your backend<br>

Layer

Layer

Layer's asynchronous messaging fabric is capable of transporting payloads of any type. Get your users talking with chat, voice or video messaging. Pull them back in with push. Connect friends, colleagues or perfect strangers seamlessly.

Scringo

Scringo

Scringo offers a unique Community &amp; Messaging Platform that turns every app into an independent, dynamic &amp; fully functional social network.

TalkJS

TalkJS

TalkJS provides a chat API & Javascript SDK with a pre-built UI that allows developers to add chat between users on websites and apps in hours instead of months.

PopcornNotify

PopcornNotify

Popcorn Notify is designed to be an effortless method for sending emails and text messages from your code. Client libraries are simple to install and are available on pip and npm.

Enterprise SMS Gateway Software & CPaaS Platform

Enterprise SMS Gateway Software & CPaaS Platform

TeleOSS provides high-throughput SMS gateway software, SMPP/SIGTRAN support, and global messaging solutions.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope