StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Messaging
  4. Communications SDK
  5. Chat by Stream vs TalkJS

Chat by Stream vs TalkJS

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

TalkJS
TalkJS
Stacks11
Followers63
Votes6
Chat by Stream
Chat by Stream
Stacks18
Followers54
Votes95

Chat by Stream vs TalkJS: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this comparison, we will highlight the key differences between Chat by Stream and TalkJS for web developers looking to integrate chat features into their applications.

  1. Pricing Model: Chat by Stream offers a flexible pricing model based on the number of monthly active users, while TalkJS provides tiered pricing plans based on the number of conversations. This difference allows developers to choose a pricing structure that aligns with their specific needs and budget.

  2. Customizability: TalkJS provides more extensive customization options, allowing developers to control the look and feel of the chat interface to a greater degree than Chat by Stream. This flexibility can be crucial for applications with strict design requirements.

  3. Documentation and Support: Chat by Stream offers comprehensive documentation and dedicated support teams to assist developers in integrating and troubleshooting their chat features. TalkJS, on the other hand, provides a robust knowledge base but may have fewer direct support options available.

  4. Scalability: Both Chat by Stream and TalkJS are designed to scale effectively as user bases grow, but they may utilize different backend technologies and infrastructure. Developers should consider the scalability requirements of their applications when choosing between the two platforms.

  5. Feature Set: TalkJS includes features like in-chat payments and read receipts, which may be beneficial for e-commerce or social networking applications. In contrast, Chat by Stream focuses more on core chat functionality and may be a better fit for simpler messaging needs.

  6. Integration Complexity: TalkJS offers a more streamlined integration process with SDKs available in a variety of programming languages, while Chat by Stream may require more manual configuration and setup. Developers should evaluate their technical capabilities and project timelines when selecting a chat solution.

In Summary, the key differences between Chat by Stream and TalkJS lie in their pricing models, customizability, documentation and support, scalability, feature sets, and integration complexity, offering developers a range of options to suit their specific requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

TalkJS
TalkJS
Chat by Stream
Chat by Stream

TalkJS provides a chat API & Javascript SDK with a pre-built UI that allows developers to add chat between users on websites and apps in hours instead of months.

Chat API and SDK. With a beautiful UI Kit, easy to use React Components and powerful API. Add Chat to any application in a matter of hours. The tech uses Go, RocksDB and Raft. By the creators of Stream, the API that powers activity feeds for more than 300 million users.

User-to-user messaging; Buyer-seller messaging; Real-time messaging; API + pre-built UI; Customizable chat UI; Email and SMS fallback; Full conversation history; Single-conversation View; Responsive cross-browser UX; Custom CSS themes; Developer-friendly API; Activity history & admin panel; Badges; Suppress contact information.
Reactions;Threads & Replies; Presence/who is online;Fulltext search on chat messages;Messages states; Typing Indicators;Message history;Powerful query support for channels and users;AI based moderation for spam and profanity;User Roles;@mentions;User invites;Mute users;Ban users;Flag Messages;Custom Messages;React Components;Push notifications;Webhooks;Unread message counts;Multi Region support;GDPR compliancy tools;HIPAA ready;Custom Slack Style Slash commands;Highly available infrastructure with Raft replication;Giphy integration;Url enrichment;Video Playback; CDN integrated;Fast response time; On premise;Fully customizable;Powerful CLI;Unlimited message retention;99.999% uptime SLA; 24/7 phone support; SAML login; 2FA for developer accounts;Emoticons;File uploads via select, drag and drop and clipboard; React Native Components;
Statistics
Stacks
11
Stacks
18
Followers
63
Followers
54
Votes
6
Votes
95
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Super fast and easy to integrate
  • 2
    Comes ready with inbuilt features e.g push notification
  • 2
    Easy to integrate
Pros
  • 15
    Reasonable Pricing
  • 14
    Threads
  • 13
    SDKs for React, RN, Android and iOS are better
  • 13
    Very fast and scalable
  • 13
    Reactions
Integrations
No integrations available
PHP
PHP
React Native
React Native
Python
Python
Ruby
Ruby
Swift
Swift
React
React
.NET
.NET
Java
Java

What are some alternatives to TalkJS, Chat by Stream?

SendBird

SendBird

SendBird is a Messaging SDK, Chat API, and fully managed chat infrastructure for your mobile apps and websites. Embeddable chat for iOS, Android, JavaScript, Unity, .NET.

Sinch

Sinch

Sinch makes it easy for developers to add voice, messaging and SMS to their apps with just a few lines of code. Enrich your apps with communications that your users will love.

ChannelizeIO

ChannelizeIO

Add In-App User-to-User Communication into Mobile Apps & Websites, with rich & engaging Text Chat, Video, and Audio Calling experiences, to Increase User Engagement and Enable new Revenue Streams.

Agora

Agora

Agora.io provides building blocks for you to add real-time voice and video communications through a simple and powerful SDK. You can integrate the Agora SDK to enable real-time communications in your own application quickly.

OpenTok

OpenTok

It adds the clarity and emotion of face-to-face communication to your brand whether you're developing for the web, iOS, or Android. We make the integration of high-quality live video a breeze so that you can focus on building a great product.

QuickBlox

QuickBlox

Add powerful communication features to your mobile app and data services for your backend<br>

Layer

Layer

Layer's asynchronous messaging fabric is capable of transporting payloads of any type. Get your users talking with chat, voice or video messaging. Pull them back in with push. Connect friends, colleagues or perfect strangers seamlessly.

Scringo

Scringo

Scringo offers a unique Community &amp; Messaging Platform that turns every app into an independent, dynamic &amp; fully functional social network.

PopcornNotify

PopcornNotify

Popcorn Notify is designed to be an effortless method for sending emails and text messages from your code. Client libraries are simple to install and are available on pip and npm.

Enterprise SMS Gateway Software & CPaaS Platform

Enterprise SMS Gateway Software & CPaaS Platform

TeleOSS provides high-throughput SMS gateway software, SMPP/SIGTRAN support, and global messaging solutions.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope