Alternatives to ConEmu logo

Alternatives to ConEmu

PowerShell, Cygwin, Hyper, Windows Terminal, and Putty are the most popular alternatives and competitors to ConEmu.
34
0

What is ConEmu and what are its top alternatives?

ConEmu is a Windows console emulator that provides multiple tabs, custom key bindings, and a variety of other features to enhance the command line experience. It supports a wide range of shells, including PowerShell, Cmd, and Bash, and allows for easy customization of colors, fonts, and other settings. However, some limitations of ConEmu include occasional crashes and compatibility issues with certain applications.

  1. Windows Terminal: Windows Terminal is a modern, fast, efficient, powerful, and productive terminal application for users of command-line tools and shells. It offers multiple tabs, panes, and customizable key bindings. Pros include a sleek UI, integration with multiple shell types, and frequent updates. Cons may include occasional bugs and limitations in customization options compared to ConEmu.
  2. cmder: cmder is a console emulator for Windows that enhances the standard Command Prompt experience with features like multiple tabs, multiple shells, and themes. Pros include a user-friendly interface, portability, and a built-in package manager. Cons may include limited customization compared to ConEmu.
  3. Hyper: Hyper is an Electron-based terminal emulator with a focus on performance, extensibility, and customizability. It supports multiple tabs, theming, and a rich plugin ecosystem. Pros include a sleek design, cross-platform compatibility, and strong community support. Cons may include occasional performance issues and resource consumption compared to ConEmu.
  4. Terminus: Terminus is a terminal emulator for Windows, macOS, and Linux with features like multiple tabs, theming, and custom plugins. Pros include a sleek interface, a variety of customization options, and support for multiple shells. Cons may include occasional stability issues and a learning curve compared to ConEmu.
  5. mintty: mintty is a terminal emulator for MSYS2, Cygwin, and WSL with features like multi-tab support, theming, and Unicode support. Pros include lightweight and fast performance, extensive customization options, and compatibility with various Unix-like environments. Cons may include a lack of intuitive configuration settings compared to ConEmu.
  6. Terminus: Terminus is a cross-platform terminal app that is heavily inspired by Hyper, providing a visually appealing interface, multiple tabs, and robust customization options. Pros include a sleek design, extensive theming options, and powerful extension support. Cons may include occasional performance issues and resource consumption compared to ConEmu.

  7. Kitty: Kitty is a fast, feature-rich, GPU-accelerated terminal emulator that supports true-color and ligatures. It offers features such as multiple tabs, custom key bindings, and scripting support. Pros include fast rendering, customizable appearance, and support for advanced features. Cons may include a steep learning curve and limited documentation compared to ConEmu.

  8. Alacritty: Alacritty is a cross-platform, GPU-accelerated terminal emulator known for its speed and minimalism. It supports features like vi mode, advanced customization, and smooth scrolling. Pros include blazing-fast performance, simple configuration, and compatibility with various operating systems. Cons may include a lack of built-in tabs and a steeper learning curve compared to ConEmu.

  9. Terminator: Terminator is a Linux terminal emulator that allows users to arrange terminals in a grid layout. It offers features like multiple tabs, drag-and-drop reordering, and custom key bindings. Pros include a flexible layout, extensive customization options, and support for plugins. Cons may include limited support for Windows and slower performance compared to ConEmu.

  10. Guake: Guake is a drop-down terminal for GNOME desktops that provides quick access to the command line with a single key press. It offers features like tabbed interface, customizable appearance, and support for transparency. Pros include easy access to the terminal, minimalistic design, and integration with GNOME. Cons may include limited configuration options compared to ConEmu.

Top Alternatives to ConEmu

  • PowerShell
    PowerShell

    A command-line shell and scripting language built on .NET. Helps system administrators and power-users rapidly automate tasks that manage operating systems (Linux, macOS, and Windows) and processes. ...

  • Cygwin
    Cygwin

    It is a POSIX-compatible environment that runs natively on Microsoft Windows. Its goal is to allow programs of Unix-like systems to be recompiled and run natively on Windows with minimal source code modifications by providing them with the same underlying POSIX API they would expect in those systems. ...

  • Hyper
    Hyper

    Hyper.sh is a secure container hosting service. What makes it different from AWS (Amazon Web Services) is that you don't start servers, but start docker images directly from Docker Hub or other registries. ...

  • Windows Terminal
    Windows Terminal

    A new, modern, feature-rich, productive terminal application for command-line users. It includes many of the features most frequently requested by the Windows command-line community. ...

  • Putty
    Putty

    It is an SSH and telnet client, developed originally by Simon Tatham for the Windows platform. It is open source software that is available with source code and is developed and supported by a group of volunteers. ...

  • Postman
    Postman

    It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide. ...

  • Postman
    Postman

    It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide. ...

  • Stack Overflow
    Stack Overflow

    Stack Overflow is a question and answer site for professional and enthusiast programmers. It's built and run by you as part of the Stack Exchange network of Q&A sites. With your help, we're working together to build a library of detailed answers to every question about programming. ...

ConEmu alternatives & related posts

PowerShell logo

PowerShell

4.5K
1K
0
A task automation and configuration management framework
4.5K
1K
+ 1
0
PROS OF POWERSHELL
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF POWERSHELL
      Be the first to leave a con

      related PowerShell posts

      Shared insights
      on
      PowerShellPowerShellPythonPython

      I currently work helpdesk and have been for about 6 years. I am looking to become more valuable, and I can't decide what route to take? Python is of interest, and so is PowerShell. What are some recommendations? Maybe something that would benefit a helpdesk position or even get into a network administrator.

      See more

      Objective: I am trying to build a custom service that will create VMs in Azure, based on inputs taken from a web interface. I want the backend code that interacts with Azure to be PowerShell.

      Ask: Hoping to find help with deciding the simplest architecture of tools to achieve this.

      What I have so far with my Limited Knowledge: I am new to Azure and Jenkins. I arrived at Jenkins coz it can run PowerShell and has API that can be called to trigger a job. Although integrating with it over the web seems problematic since its on-prem network. I hear it is possible using the VPN. For the Web, I hope to use Azure Web App with Python/Node.js that I can manage to make API calls to Jenkins.

      Is there a better way? I just need help getting the right directions; I will walk the way.

      See more
      Cygwin logo

      Cygwin

      26
      26
      0
      A way to run native Linux apps on Windows
      26
      26
      + 1
      0
      PROS OF CYGWIN
        Be the first to leave a pro
        CONS OF CYGWIN
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Cygwin posts

          Hyper logo

          Hyper

          207
          79
          0
          On-Demand Container, Per-Second Billing
          207
          79
          + 1
          0
          PROS OF HYPER
            Be the first to leave a pro
            CONS OF HYPER
              Be the first to leave a con

              related Hyper posts

              Windows Terminal logo

              Windows Terminal

              151
              173
              6
              Productive terminal application for command-line users
              151
              173
              + 1
              6
              PROS OF WINDOWS TERMINAL
              • 2
                Add almost any cli tool using profiles
              • 2
                Can be highly customized by using terminal preview
              • 2
                Free
              CONS OF WINDOWS TERMINAL
                Be the first to leave a con

                related Windows Terminal posts

                Putty logo

                Putty

                179
                114
                2
                A free SSH and Telnet client
                179
                114
                + 1
                2
                PROS OF PUTTY
                • 1
                  More popular
                • 1
                  Free
                CONS OF PUTTY
                  Be the first to leave a con

                  related Putty posts

                  Postman logo

                  Postman

                  94.3K
                  80.8K
                  1.8K
                  Only complete API development environment
                  94.3K
                  80.8K
                  + 1
                  1.8K
                  PROS OF POSTMAN
                  • 490
                    Easy to use
                  • 369
                    Great tool
                  • 276
                    Makes developing rest api's easy peasy
                  • 156
                    Easy setup, looks good
                  • 144
                    The best api workflow out there
                  • 53
                    It's the best
                  • 53
                    History feature
                  • 44
                    Adds real value to my workflow
                  • 43
                    Great interface that magically predicts your needs
                  • 35
                    The best in class app
                  • 12
                    Can save and share script
                  • 10
                    Fully featured without looking cluttered
                  • 8
                    Collections
                  • 8
                    Option to run scrips
                  • 8
                    Global/Environment Variables
                  • 7
                    Shareable Collections
                  • 7
                    Dead simple and useful. Excellent
                  • 7
                    Dark theme easy on the eyes
                  • 6
                    Awesome customer support
                  • 6
                    Great integration with newman
                  • 5
                    Documentation
                  • 5
                    Simple
                  • 5
                    The test script is useful
                  • 4
                    Saves responses
                  • 4
                    This has simplified my testing significantly
                  • 4
                    Makes testing API's as easy as 1,2,3
                  • 4
                    Easy as pie
                  • 3
                    API-network
                  • 3
                    I'd recommend it to everyone who works with apis
                  • 3
                    Mocking API calls with predefined response
                  • 2
                    Now supports GraphQL
                  • 2
                    Postman Runner CI Integration
                  • 2
                    Easy to setup, test and provides test storage
                  • 2
                    Continuous integration using newman
                  • 2
                    Pre-request Script and Test attributes are invaluable
                  • 2
                    Runner
                  • 2
                    Graph
                  • 1
                    <a href="http://fixbit.com/">useful tool</a>
                  CONS OF POSTMAN
                  • 10
                    Stores credentials in HTTP
                  • 9
                    Bloated features and UI
                  • 8
                    Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens
                  • 7
                    Poor GraphQL support
                  • 5
                    Expensive
                  • 3
                    Not free after 5 users
                  • 3
                    Can't prompt for per-request variables
                  • 1
                    Import swagger
                  • 1
                    Support websocket
                  • 1
                    Import curl

                  related Postman posts

                  Noah Zoschke
                  Engineering Manager at Segment · | 30 upvotes · 2.9M views

                  We just launched the Segment Config API (try it out for yourself here) — a set of public REST APIs that enable you to manage your Segment configuration. A public API is only as good as its #documentation. For the API reference doc we are using Postman.

                  Postman is an “API development environment”. You download the desktop app, and build API requests by URL and payload. Over time you can build up a set of requests and organize them into a “Postman Collection”. You can generalize a collection with “collection variables”. This allows you to parameterize things like username, password and workspace_name so a user can fill their own values in before making an API call. This makes it possible to use Postman for one-off API tasks instead of writing code.

                  Then you can add Markdown content to the entire collection, a folder of related methods, and/or every API method to explain how the APIs work. You can publish a collection and easily share it with a URL.

                  This turns Postman from a personal #API utility to full-blown public interactive API documentation. The result is a great looking web page with all the API calls, docs and sample requests and responses in one place. Check out the results here.

                  Postman’s powers don’t end here. You can automate Postman with “test scripts” and have it periodically run a collection scripts as “monitors”. We now have #QA around all the APIs in public docs to make sure they are always correct

                  Along the way we tried other techniques for documenting APIs like ReadMe.io or Swagger UI. These required a lot of effort to customize.

                  Writing and maintaining a Postman collection takes some work, but the resulting documentation site, interactivity and API testing tools are well worth it.

                  See more
                  Simon Reymann
                  Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 27 upvotes · 5M views

                  Our whole Node.js backend stack consists of the following tools:

                  • Lerna as a tool for multi package and multi repository management
                  • npm as package manager
                  • NestJS as Node.js framework
                  • TypeScript as programming language
                  • ExpressJS as web server
                  • Swagger UI for visualizing and interacting with the API’s resources
                  • Postman as a tool for API development
                  • TypeORM as object relational mapping layer
                  • JSON Web Token for access token management

                  The main reason we have chosen Node.js over PHP is related to the following artifacts:

                  • Made for the web and widely in use: Node.js is a software platform for developing server-side network services. Well-known projects that rely on Node.js include the blogging software Ghost, the project management tool Trello and the operating system WebOS. Node.js requires the JavaScript runtime environment V8, which was specially developed by Google for the popular Chrome browser. This guarantees a very resource-saving architecture, which qualifies Node.js especially for the operation of a web server. Ryan Dahl, the developer of Node.js, released the first stable version on May 27, 2009. He developed Node.js out of dissatisfaction with the possibilities that JavaScript offered at the time. The basic functionality of Node.js has been mapped with JavaScript since the first version, which can be expanded with a large number of different modules. The current package managers (npm or Yarn) for Node.js know more than 1,000,000 of these modules.
                  • Fast server-side solutions: Node.js adopts the JavaScript "event-loop" to create non-blocking I/O applications that conveniently serve simultaneous events. With the standard available asynchronous processing within JavaScript/TypeScript, highly scalable, server-side solutions can be realized. The efficient use of the CPU and the RAM is maximized and more simultaneous requests can be processed than with conventional multi-thread servers.
                  • A language along the entire stack: Widely used frameworks such as React or AngularJS or Vue.js, which we prefer, are written in JavaScript/TypeScript. If Node.js is now used on the server side, you can use all the advantages of a uniform script language throughout the entire application development. The same language in the back- and frontend simplifies the maintenance of the application and also the coordination within the development team.
                  • Flexibility: Node.js sets very few strict dependencies, rules and guidelines and thus grants a high degree of flexibility in application development. There are no strict conventions so that the appropriate architecture, design structures, modules and features can be freely selected for the development.
                  See more
                  Postman logo

                  Postman

                  94.3K
                  80.8K
                  1.8K
                  Only complete API development environment
                  94.3K
                  80.8K
                  + 1
                  1.8K
                  PROS OF POSTMAN
                  • 490
                    Easy to use
                  • 369
                    Great tool
                  • 276
                    Makes developing rest api's easy peasy
                  • 156
                    Easy setup, looks good
                  • 144
                    The best api workflow out there
                  • 53
                    It's the best
                  • 53
                    History feature
                  • 44
                    Adds real value to my workflow
                  • 43
                    Great interface that magically predicts your needs
                  • 35
                    The best in class app
                  • 12
                    Can save and share script
                  • 10
                    Fully featured without looking cluttered
                  • 8
                    Collections
                  • 8
                    Option to run scrips
                  • 8
                    Global/Environment Variables
                  • 7
                    Shareable Collections
                  • 7
                    Dead simple and useful. Excellent
                  • 7
                    Dark theme easy on the eyes
                  • 6
                    Awesome customer support
                  • 6
                    Great integration with newman
                  • 5
                    Documentation
                  • 5
                    Simple
                  • 5
                    The test script is useful
                  • 4
                    Saves responses
                  • 4
                    This has simplified my testing significantly
                  • 4
                    Makes testing API's as easy as 1,2,3
                  • 4
                    Easy as pie
                  • 3
                    API-network
                  • 3
                    I'd recommend it to everyone who works with apis
                  • 3
                    Mocking API calls with predefined response
                  • 2
                    Now supports GraphQL
                  • 2
                    Postman Runner CI Integration
                  • 2
                    Easy to setup, test and provides test storage
                  • 2
                    Continuous integration using newman
                  • 2
                    Pre-request Script and Test attributes are invaluable
                  • 2
                    Runner
                  • 2
                    Graph
                  • 1
                    <a href="http://fixbit.com/">useful tool</a>
                  CONS OF POSTMAN
                  • 10
                    Stores credentials in HTTP
                  • 9
                    Bloated features and UI
                  • 8
                    Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens
                  • 7
                    Poor GraphQL support
                  • 5
                    Expensive
                  • 3
                    Not free after 5 users
                  • 3
                    Can't prompt for per-request variables
                  • 1
                    Import swagger
                  • 1
                    Support websocket
                  • 1
                    Import curl

                  related Postman posts

                  Noah Zoschke
                  Engineering Manager at Segment · | 30 upvotes · 2.9M views

                  We just launched the Segment Config API (try it out for yourself here) — a set of public REST APIs that enable you to manage your Segment configuration. A public API is only as good as its #documentation. For the API reference doc we are using Postman.

                  Postman is an “API development environment”. You download the desktop app, and build API requests by URL and payload. Over time you can build up a set of requests and organize them into a “Postman Collection”. You can generalize a collection with “collection variables”. This allows you to parameterize things like username, password and workspace_name so a user can fill their own values in before making an API call. This makes it possible to use Postman for one-off API tasks instead of writing code.

                  Then you can add Markdown content to the entire collection, a folder of related methods, and/or every API method to explain how the APIs work. You can publish a collection and easily share it with a URL.

                  This turns Postman from a personal #API utility to full-blown public interactive API documentation. The result is a great looking web page with all the API calls, docs and sample requests and responses in one place. Check out the results here.

                  Postman’s powers don’t end here. You can automate Postman with “test scripts” and have it periodically run a collection scripts as “monitors”. We now have #QA around all the APIs in public docs to make sure they are always correct

                  Along the way we tried other techniques for documenting APIs like ReadMe.io or Swagger UI. These required a lot of effort to customize.

                  Writing and maintaining a Postman collection takes some work, but the resulting documentation site, interactivity and API testing tools are well worth it.

                  See more
                  Simon Reymann
                  Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 27 upvotes · 5M views

                  Our whole Node.js backend stack consists of the following tools:

                  • Lerna as a tool for multi package and multi repository management
                  • npm as package manager
                  • NestJS as Node.js framework
                  • TypeScript as programming language
                  • ExpressJS as web server
                  • Swagger UI for visualizing and interacting with the API’s resources
                  • Postman as a tool for API development
                  • TypeORM as object relational mapping layer
                  • JSON Web Token for access token management

                  The main reason we have chosen Node.js over PHP is related to the following artifacts:

                  • Made for the web and widely in use: Node.js is a software platform for developing server-side network services. Well-known projects that rely on Node.js include the blogging software Ghost, the project management tool Trello and the operating system WebOS. Node.js requires the JavaScript runtime environment V8, which was specially developed by Google for the popular Chrome browser. This guarantees a very resource-saving architecture, which qualifies Node.js especially for the operation of a web server. Ryan Dahl, the developer of Node.js, released the first stable version on May 27, 2009. He developed Node.js out of dissatisfaction with the possibilities that JavaScript offered at the time. The basic functionality of Node.js has been mapped with JavaScript since the first version, which can be expanded with a large number of different modules. The current package managers (npm or Yarn) for Node.js know more than 1,000,000 of these modules.
                  • Fast server-side solutions: Node.js adopts the JavaScript "event-loop" to create non-blocking I/O applications that conveniently serve simultaneous events. With the standard available asynchronous processing within JavaScript/TypeScript, highly scalable, server-side solutions can be realized. The efficient use of the CPU and the RAM is maximized and more simultaneous requests can be processed than with conventional multi-thread servers.
                  • A language along the entire stack: Widely used frameworks such as React or AngularJS or Vue.js, which we prefer, are written in JavaScript/TypeScript. If Node.js is now used on the server side, you can use all the advantages of a uniform script language throughout the entire application development. The same language in the back- and frontend simplifies the maintenance of the application and also the coordination within the development team.
                  • Flexibility: Node.js sets very few strict dependencies, rules and guidelines and thus grants a high degree of flexibility in application development. There are no strict conventions so that the appropriate architecture, design structures, modules and features can be freely selected for the development.
                  See more
                  Stack Overflow logo

                  Stack Overflow

                  68.9K
                  60.9K
                  893
                  Question and answer site for professional and enthusiast programmers
                  68.9K
                  60.9K
                  + 1
                  893
                  PROS OF STACK OVERFLOW
                  • 257
                    Scary smart community
                  • 206
                    Knows all
                  • 142
                    Voting system
                  • 134
                    Good questions
                  • 83
                    Good SEO
                  • 22
                    Addictive
                  • 14
                    Tight focus
                  • 10
                    Share and gain knowledge
                  • 7
                    Useful
                  • 3
                    Fast loading
                  • 2
                    Gamification
                  • 1
                    Knows everyone
                  • 1
                    Experts share experience and answer questions
                  • 1
                    Stack overflow to developers As google to net surfers
                  • 1
                    Questions answered quickly
                  • 1
                    No annoying ads
                  • 1
                    No spam
                  • 1
                    Fast community response
                  • 1
                    Good moderators
                  • 1
                    Quick answers from users
                  • 1
                    Good answers
                  • 1
                    User reputation ranking
                  • 1
                    Efficient answers
                  • 1
                    Leading developer community
                  CONS OF STACK OVERFLOW
                  • 3
                    Not welcoming to newbies
                  • 3
                    Unfair downvoting
                  • 3
                    Unfriendly moderators
                  • 3
                    No opinion based questions
                  • 3
                    Mean users
                  • 2
                    Limited to types of questions it can accept

                  related Stack Overflow posts

                  Tom Klein

                  Google Analytics is a great tool to analyze your traffic. To debug our software and ask questions, we love to use Postman and Stack Overflow. Google Drive helps our team to share documents. We're able to build our great products through the APIs by Google Maps, CloudFlare, Stripe, PayPal, Twilio, Let's Encrypt, and TensorFlow.

                  See more