Corona SDK vs react-three-fiber

Overview

Corona SDK

Stacks17

Followers37

Votes5

react-three-fiber

Stacks52

Followers46

Votes0

Corona SDK vs react-three-fiber: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Corona SDK and react-three-fiber are both popular tools in the world of software development. However, they have key differences that distinguish them from each other.

1. Rendering Engine: Corona SDK uses its own 2D rendering engine optimized for mobile devices, while react-three-fiber is based on Three.js, a popular library for creating 3D graphics on the web.

2. Programming Language: Corona SDK primarily uses Lua for programming, which is known for its simplicity and ease of use. On the other hand, react-three-fiber utilizes JavaScript and WebGL to create 3D scenes in the browser.

3. Platform Support: Corona SDK is mainly focused on mobile app development for iOS and Android, offering features specific to creating mobile applications. In contrast, react-three-fiber is built for web applications and supports a wider range of platforms like desktop browsers and mobile browsers.

4. Community and Support: Corona SDK has an established community and support system due to its longevity in the market, providing documentation, forums, and tutorials for developers. React-three-fiber, being part of the larger React ecosystem, benefits from the extensive support and resources available for React developers.

5. Development Environment: Corona SDK provides a complete integrated development environment (IDE) that includes a simulator for testing apps without the need for external tools. React-three-fiber, being a library for React, is developed within the existing React development environment and workflow, integrating seamlessly with React applications.

6. Performance: Corona SDK is optimized for 2D game development and provides tools for efficient rendering on mobile devices, resulting in good performance for 2D games. React-three-fiber, focusing on 3D graphics, offers powerful rendering capabilities through Three.js and WebGL, making it suitable for complex 3D scenes with high performance.

In Summary, Corona SDK and react-three-fiber differ in terms of their rendering engines, programming languages, platform support, community and support, development environments, and performance optimizations.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Corona SDK	react-three-fiber
It is a cross-platform framework ideal for rapidly creating apps and games for mobile devices and desktop systems. It builds rich mobile apps for iOS, Android, Kindle and Nook. Build high quality mobile apps in a fraction of the time.	It is a React renderer for Threejs on the web and react-native. Rendering performance is up to Threejs and the GPU. Components participate in the renderloop outside of React, without any additional overhead.
Call any native library; Cross-platform; Completely free	React renderer for Three.js; Web and react-native
Statistics
Stacks 17	Stacks 52
Followers 37	Followers 46
Votes 5	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 3 Also potentially build for OS Apple 2 Lua code better than java code Cons 4 Not Very popular 2 Very Poor System	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Google AdMob JetBrains Rider PlayFab Lua Vuforia TestFairy Pushwoosh Helpshift	React three.js

What are some alternatives to Corona SDK, react-three-fiber?

Underscore

A JavaScript library that provides a whole mess of useful functional programming helpers without extending any built-in objects.

Deno

It is a secure runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript built with V8, Rust, and Tokio.

Unity

Unity is the ultimate game development platform. Use Unity to build high-quality 3D and 2D games, deploy them across mobile, desktop, VR/AR, consoles or the Web, and connect with loyal and enthusiastic players and customers.

Godot

It is an advanced, feature-packed, multi-platform 2D and 3D open source game engine. It is developed by hundreds of contributors from all around the world.

Chart.js

Visualize your data in 6 different ways. Each of them animated, with a load of customisation options and interactivity extensions.

Unreal Engine

It is a game engine that helps you make games. It is made up of several components that work together to drive the game. Its massive system of tools and editors allows you to organize your assets and manipulate them to create the gameplay for your game.

Gamemaker Studio 2

It has everything you need to take your idea from concept to finished game. With no barriers to entry and powerful functionality.

Immutable.js

Immutable provides Persistent Immutable List, Stack, Map, OrderedMap, Set, OrderedSet and Record. They are highly efficient on modern JavaScript VMs by using structural sharing via hash maps tries and vector tries as popularized by Clojure and Scala, minimizing the need to copy or cache data.

Panda3D

It is a game engine that includes graphics, audio, I/O, collision detection, and other abilities relevant to the creation of 3D games.

pygame

It is a cross-platform set of Python modules designed for writing video games. It includes computer graphics and sound libraries designed to be used with the Python programming language.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Flyway vs Liquibase

Corona SDK vs react-three-fiber: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Corona SDK and react-three-fiber are both popular tools in the world of software development. However, they have key differences that distinguish them from each other.

1. Rendering Engine: Corona SDK uses its own 2D rendering engine optimized for mobile devices, while react-three-fiber is based on Three.js, a popular library for creating 3D graphics on the web.