Crucible vs Review Board

Overview

Review Board

Stacks19

Followers52

Votes6

GitHub Stars1.7K

Forks435

Crucible

Stacks55

Followers118

Votes12

Crucible vs Review Board: What are the differences?

Integration with JIRA: One of the key differences between Crucible and Review Board is their integration with JIRA. Crucible seamlessly integrates with JIRA, allowing for better tracking and visibility of code reviews within the JIRA issue tracker. Review Board, on the other hand, does not have a direct integration with JIRA, making it more challenging for users to link code reviews to specific JIRA issues.
Support for Git and Mercurial: Crucible supports Git and Mercurial repositories, providing users with flexible options for code review. Review Board, on the other hand, primarily focuses on supporting Git, Mercurial, and Perforce, which could be a limitation for organizations using other version control systems.
Scalability and Performance: Crucible is known for its scalability and performance, especially when handling large codebases and numerous code reviews simultaneously. Review Board, while capable of handling code reviews effectively, may face performance issues when dealing with extensive codebases and numerous concurrent reviews.
Pre-commit Reviews: Crucible supports pre-commit reviews, allowing developers to request feedback on code changes before committing them to the repository. Review Board, on the other hand, primarily focuses on post-commit reviews, where feedback is provided after the changes have been committed.
Customization and Extension: Crucible offers more customization and extension options, allowing users to tailor the code review process to meet their specific requirements. Review Board, while customizable to some extent, may have limitations in terms of extending functionalities beyond its core features.
Price and Licensing Model: There is a difference in the pricing and licensing models between Crucible and Review Board. Crucible is typically part of the Atlassian suite, which comes with a licensing cost based on the number of users. Review Board, however, is an open-source tool, making it a more cost-effective option for organizations looking for a free code review solution.

In Summary, Crucible and Review Board differ in their integration with JIRA, support for version control systems, scalability, support for pre-commit reviews, customization options, and pricing models.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Review Board	Crucible
Review Board is an open source, web-based code and document review tool built to help companies, open source projects, and other organizations keep their quality high and their bug count low.	It is a Web-based application primarily aimed at enterprise, and certain features that enable peer review of a code base may be considered enterprise social software.
Syntax-highlighted diffs; Smarter indentation handling; Moved code detection; Know exactly what function or class you're in; See more context in your diffs; Multi-line commenting in diffs/text files; Track status of automated builds and reviews	Workflow-based reviews;Quick reviews with cut-and-paste snippets;Create reviews from the command line;One-click reviews from changesets or issues;Threaded comments, inline discussions
Statistics
GitHub Stars 1.7K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 435	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 19	Stacks 55
Followers 52	Followers 118
Votes 6	Votes 12
Pros & Cons
Pros 3 Simple to use. Great UI 1 Open Source 1 Review Bots 1 Diff between review versions	Pros 5 JIRA Integration 4 Post-commit preview 2 Has a linux version 1 Pre-commit preview
Integrations
Travis CI Slack iDoneThis Bitbucket GitHub Git Azure DevOps CircleCI GitLab Trello	Trello Jira Bitbucket Confluence

What are some alternatives to Review Board, Crucible?

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Related Comparisons

Crucible vs Review Board

Overview