StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. Devise vs ORY Hydra

Devise vs ORY Hydra

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Devise
Devise
Stacks535
Followers232
Votes56
ORY Hydra
ORY Hydra
Stacks23
Followers157
Votes8
GitHub Stars16.6K
Forks1.6K

Devise vs ORY Hydra: What are the differences?

  1. Authentication and Authorization: Devise is a comprehensive authentication solution for Ruby on Rails, providing a set of easy-to-use authentication features. It handles user registration, session management, password encryption, and more. On the other hand, ORY Hydra is an open-source OAuth2 and OpenID Connect (OIDC) server that provides authentication and authorization services for microservices and web applications. It supports various authentication methods, including OAuth2, OAuth2 Client Credentials, and OpenID Connect.

  2. Scalability: Devise is designed primarily for single-server applications and is not inherently scalable. It relies on session-based authentication, which can become a bottleneck when dealing with a large number of concurrent users. ORY Hydra, on the other hand, is built with scalability in mind. It uses stateless JSON Web Tokens (JWT) and leverages a distributed architecture, making it highly scalable and suitable for handling a large number of authentication requests across multiple servers.

  3. Customization and Flexibility: Devise provides a rich set of default features and configurations, making it easy to get started with authentication. However, customizing and extending Devise can be complex, as it uses a monolithic approach where all the authentication logic is handled by Devise itself. ORY Hydra, on the other hand, offers much more flexibility and customization options. It provides a modular architecture and allows developers to choose the components they need, making it easier to integrate with existing systems and tailor the authentication flow to specific requirements.

  4. Support for OAuth2 and OpenID Connect: While Devise focuses primarily on traditional session-based authentication, ORY Hydra is specifically designed to support modern authentication protocols like OAuth2 and OpenID Connect. It provides all the necessary endpoints, workflows, and functionalities required for implementing OAuth2 and OpenID Connect flows, including authentication, authorization, token issuance, and token validation.

  5. Integration with Microservices: Devise is a monolithic authentication solution that is tightly coupled with the Rails application it is integrated with. It may not be the ideal choice for applications built using a microservices architecture, where authentication is often decentralized and handled by separate authentication services. ORY Hydra, on the other hand, is specifically designed for microservices and can handle authentication and authorization centrally, making it easier to integrate with other services and share authentication across multiple applications or APIs.

  6. Security Features: Devise provides a range of security features like password encryption, account lockouts, and CSRF protection. However, ORY Hydra places a stronger emphasis on security and provides additional features like client authentication, user consent management, token revocation, and token introspection. It also supports more advanced security mechanisms like two-factor authentication (2FA) and multi-factor authentication (MFA), making it a better choice for applications that require higher levels of security.

In Summary, Devise and ORY Hydra differ in their scope and focus, with Devise being a comprehensive authentication solution for Ruby on Rails applications and ORY Hydra being an OAuth2 and OpenID Connect server designed for scalability, flexibility, and integration with microservices. ORY Hydra provides support for modern authentication protocols, offers more customization options, and emphasizes security features, making it a better choice for applications with specific requirements in those areas.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Devise
Devise
ORY Hydra
ORY Hydra

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Is Rack based;Is a complete MVC solution based on Rails engines;Allows you to have multiple models signed in at the same time;Is based on a modularity concept: use just what you really need.
OAuth 2.0 Authorization Server;OpenID Connect certified;Flexible User Management;High Performance;Developer Friendly
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
16.6K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.6K
Stacks
535
Stacks
23
Followers
232
Followers
157
Votes
56
Votes
8
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 33
    Reliable
  • 17
    Open Source
  • 4
    Support for neo4j database
  • 2
    Secure
Pros
  • 4
    Open-source
  • 2
    Scalable
  • 2
    Fully customizable
Integrations
Rails
Rails
ORY Kratos
ORY Kratos
Docker
Docker
Node.js
Node.js
JavaScript
JavaScript
TypeScript
TypeScript
Golang
Golang
Ruby
Ruby
Python
Python
Java
Java
PHP
PHP

What are some alternatives to Devise, ORY Hydra?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Let's Encrypt

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Sqreen

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Instant 2FA

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope