StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Browser Testing
  5. Endtest vs Selenium

Endtest vs Selenium

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Selenium
Selenium
Stacks16.2K
Followers12.6K
Votes527
GitHub Stars33.6K
Forks8.6K
Endtest
Endtest
Stacks10
Followers32
Votes0

Endtest vs Selenium: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the world of automated testing, tools like Endtest and Selenium are popular choices. Understanding the key differences between them can help in making an informed decision when selecting a testing tool for a project.

  1. Language Support: Endtest mainly supports JavaScript, while Selenium provides support for various languages such as Java, Python, C#, Ruby, and JavaScript. This difference allows users to choose a language they are comfortable with for writing test scripts.

  2. Ease of Use: Endtest is known for its user-friendly interface and minimal coding requirements, making it easy for beginners to start automated testing. On the other hand, Selenium requires more technical expertise and coding skills, which may be challenging for non-technical users.

  3. Deployment Options: Endtest offers both cloud-based and on-premise deployment options, providing flexibility based on project requirements and security concerns. Selenium, on the other hand, is primarily used for on-premise deployment, limiting the cloud-based testing capabilities.

  4. Integration with CI/CD Tools: Selenium seamlessly integrates with popular CI/CD tools like Jenkins, Bamboo, and TeamCity, allowing for automated testing in the continuous integration pipeline. While Endtest also supports integration with CI/CD tools, Selenium provides a wider range of options and better customization.

  5. Browser and Device Compatibility: Endtest offers a comprehensive list of supported browsers and devices for test execution, ensuring cross-browser compatibility. Selenium, although versatile, may require additional configurations and setup to achieve the same level of compatibility across different browsers and devices.

  6. Community Support and Resources: Selenium has a massive community of developers and testers contributing to its libraries, documentation, and forums, providing extensive support and resources for troubleshooting and learning. While Endtest also has a growing community, it may not offer the same level of resources and community support as Selenium.

In Summary, when choosing between Endtest and Selenium, consider factors like language support, ease of use, deployment options, integration with CI/CD tools, browser compatibility, and community support to find the best fit for your automated testing needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Selenium, Endtest

Shivam
Shivam

Mar 5, 2020

Needs advice

we are having one web application developed in Reacts.js. in the application, we have only 4 to 5 pages that we need to test. I am having experience in selenium with java. Please suggets which tool I should use. and why ............................ ............................ .............................

241k views241k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Selenium
Selenium
Endtest
Endtest

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

It is a platform that allows you to create, manage and run Automated Tests for Web Applications without writing any code.

-
Take Screenshots; Unlimited Video Recordings; Generate Random Test Data; Use Variables; Upload Files; Advanced Assertions; Execute JavaScript; Endtest API Geolocation; Screenshot Comparison; Scheduler; Self-Healing Tests; Real Mobile Devices; Test Native Mobile Apps; Notifications; Teams; IF Statements; Live Video; Advanced Settings; Drive Automatic Backups
Statistics
GitHub Stars
33.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
8.6K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
16.2K
Stacks
10
Followers
12.6K
Followers
32
Votes
527
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 177
    Automates browsers
  • 154
    Testing
  • 101
    Essential tool for running test automation
  • 24
    Record-Playback
  • 24
    Remote Control
Cons
  • 8
    Flaky tests
  • 4
    Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui)
  • 2
    Update browser drivers
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
CircleCI
CircleCI
Slack
Slack
GitHub
GitHub
Heroku
Heroku
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
GitLab
GitLab
Travis CI
Travis CI
AWS CodePipeline
AWS CodePipeline
Buildkite
Buildkite
Codeship
Codeship

What are some alternatives to Selenium, Endtest?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Zapier

Zapier

Zapier is for busy people who know their time is better spent selling, marketing, or coding. Instead of wasting valuable time coming up with complicated systems - you can use Zapier to automate the web services you and your team are already using on a daily basis.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

IFTTT

IFTTT

It helps you connect all of your different apps and devices. You can enable your apps and devices to work together to do specific things they couldn't do otherwise.

n8n

n8n

It is a free node based Workflow Automation Tool. Easily automate tasks accross different services. Synchronise data between different apps/databases.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana