Fail2ban vs Veracode

Overview

Fail2ban

Stacks64

Followers57

Votes0

GitHub Stars15.9K

Forks1.4K

Veracode

Stacks66

Followers129

Votes0

Fail2ban vs Veracode: What are the differences?

Developers describe Fail2ban as "*An intrusion prevention software framework *". It is an intrusion prevention software framework that protects computer servers from brute-force attacks. Written in the Python programming language, it is able to run on POSIX systems that have an interface to a packet-control system or firewall installed locally, for example, iptables or TCP Wrapper. On the other hand, Veracode is detailed as "A simpler and more scalable way to increase the resiliency of your global application infrastructure". It seamlessly integrates application security into the software lifecycle, effectively eliminating vulnerabilities during the lowest-cost point in the development/deployment chain, and blocking threats while in production.

Fail2ban and Veracode can be categorized as "Security" tools.

Fail2ban is an open source tool with 4.27K GitHub stars and 769 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Fail2ban's open source repository on GitHub.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Fail2ban	Veracode
It is an intrusion prevention software framework that protects computer servers from brute-force attacks. Written in the Python programming language, it is able to run on POSIX systems that have an interface to a packet-control system or firewall installed locally, for example, iptables or TCP Wrapper.	It seamlessly integrates application security into the software lifecycle, effectively eliminating vulnerabilities during the lowest-cost point in the development/deployment chain, and blocking threats while in production.
-	Statice Application Security Scanning; Dynamic Application Security Scanning
Statistics
GitHub Stars 15.9K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 1.4K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 64	Stacks 66
Followers 57	Followers 129
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
Python Linux macOS	Gradle Apache Maven Jenkins Bitbucket Travis CI Apache Ant Appveyor

What are some alternatives to Fail2ban, Veracode?

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.