StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. Prototyping
  4. Mobile Prototyping Interaction Design Tools
  5. Fluid UI vs Material

Fluid UI vs Material

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Material
Material
Stacks96
Followers88
Votes3
GitHub Stars12.0K
Forks1.3K
Fluid UI
Fluid UI
Stacks3
Followers12
Votes0

Fluid UI vs Material: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the realm of user interface design, two popular frameworks that offer unique features and design principles are Fluid UI and Material. Understanding the key differences between these frameworks can help developers and designers make informed decisions when choosing the best approach for their projects.

  1. Design Philosophy: Fluid UI focuses on providing a seamless and consistent user experience across different devices and screen sizes, aiming to create interfaces that adapt to the user's needs effortlessly. On the other hand, Material design by Google emphasizes realistic motion, responsive interaction, and meaningful transitions to create a visually appealing and intuitive user experience.

  2. Component Library: Fluid UI offers a wide range of pre-built components such as buttons, menus, and navigation bars that can be easily customized to fit specific design requirements. In contrast, Material design provides a comprehensive set of design components and guidelines that adhere to a specific visual language for consistent design across various platforms and applications.

  3. Animation and Motion: When it comes to animation and motion design, Fluid UI places a strong emphasis on fluid transitions and dynamic animations to enhance user engagement and create a more interactive experience. Material design, on the other hand, focuses on meaningful motion that guides users through the interface and helps maintain visual hierarchy without overwhelming the user.

  4. Color Palette and Typography: Fluid UI allows for more flexibility in terms of color schemes and typography choices, enabling designers to create unique and personalized interfaces that reflect the brand's identity. Material design, on the other hand, follows a strict color palette and typography guidelines to ensure consistency and coherence in design across different devices and platforms.

  5. Platform Compatibility: Fluid UI is designed to be platform-agnostic, allowing designers to create interfaces that work seamlessly across various operating systems and devices. In contrast, Material design is optimized for Android platforms, offering specific design guidelines and components tailored for Android applications.

  6. Customization and Extensibility: Fluid UI offers extensive customization options, allowing designers to create highly tailored interfaces that meet specific design requirements. Material design, while providing a comprehensive design system, may offer limited customization options, as the focus is on maintaining visual consistency and coherence across different applications.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Fluid UI and Material design can help designers and developers make informed decisions based on design philosophy, component library, animation and motion design, color palette and typography, platform compatibility, and customization options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Material
Material
Fluid UI
Fluid UI

Express your creativity with Material, an animation and graphics framework for Google's Material Design and Apple's Flat UI in Swift.

It is a prototyping tool that lets you design, test and get feedback on your app ideas quickly and without needing to know how to code.

Fully Configurable UI Components;Grid System For Complex UIs;Layout Library To Simplify AutoLayout;Base Material Layers & Material Views To Create New UI Components;Side Navigation View Controller;Navigation Bar View & Controller;Search Bar View;Material Buttons;Material Switch;Material Card Views;Menu Toolset To Create Animated Menus;Camera / Video Extension With Extensive Functionality;Animation Extension To Create Intricate Animations;Complete Material Color Library;Example Projects
Prototyping; Mockups; Wireframes; Online collaboration; Built-in libraries; On device testing; Comments and feedback; Live presentation; Gestures and transitions; Upload assets; Export HTML, screens and screenflow
Statistics
GitHub Stars
12.0K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.3K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
96
Stacks
3
Followers
88
Followers
12
Votes
3
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    IOS benefits
  • 1
    Samples included
  • 1
    Good Documentation
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Objective-C
Objective-C
Swift
Swift
Confluence
Confluence
Trello
Trello
Jira
Jira
FogBugz
FogBugz
InVision
InVision
Dropbox
Dropbox
Google Drive
Google Drive

What are some alternatives to Material, Fluid UI?

Balsamiq

Balsamiq

Balsamiq Mockups is a web tool that allows users to mock up different designs and ideas quickly and easily. Balsamic Mockups is similar to drawing mockups, but it is digital

Framer

Framer

Framer is a JavaScript framework that makes creating realistic prototypes a breeze – complete with filters, spring physics and full 3D effects. Framer Generator is a desktop app that imports the resources and folder hierarchy from Photoshop files (Sketch coming soon). Import your design and immediately start to add interaction and animation.

UXPin

UXPin

It is a code-based design tool that merges design and engineering into one unified process. Thanks to conditional interactions, variables, state-based animations, and powerful expressions, you can build prototypes that feel like the real thing. In other words, anything that's on the web can be accurately prototyped in UXPin.

ProtoPie

ProtoPie

It is the easiest tool used to turn your UI/UX design ideas into highly interactive prototypes for mobile, desktop, web, all the way to IoT. ProtoPie runs on macOS & Windows and the player app is on iOS and Android.

Origami

Origami

Origami is a free toolkit for Quartz Composer—created by the Facebook Design team—that makes interactive design prototyping easy and doesn’t require programming.

Supernova

Supernova

Supernova converts any mobile design to full-fledged native applications, giving the developers extra time to do actual coding. No need to export resources, write navigation, connect it to components created by hand, read styles, apply styles, copy-paste information..

Lottie

Lottie

Lottie is a mobile library for Android and iOS that parses Adobe After Effects animations exported as json with Bodymovin and renders them natively on mobile!

Pidoco

Pidoco

It is software that lets you quickly create click-through wireframes and fully interactive UX prototypes.

Whimsical Wireframes

Whimsical Wireframes

Instant wireframing at your fingertips. Whimsical includes a rich library of configurable elements like buttons, inputs, checkboxes, and more.

Principle

Principle

It makes it easy to design animated and interactive user interfaces. Whether you're designing the flow of a multi-screen app, or new interactions and animations, it helps you create designs that look and feel amazing.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope