GitHub vs GitHub Enterprise

Overview

GitHub

Stacks295.5K

Followers259.0K

Votes10.4K

GitHub Enterprise

Stacks500

Followers627

Votes10

GitHub vs GitHub Enterprise: What are the differences?

GitHub and GitHub Enterprise are used for version control and collaborative software development. To better understand their distinctions, let's explore the key differences between GitHub, a cloud-based offering, and GitHub Enterprise, a self-hosted solution:

Deployment and Infrastructure: GitHub is a cloud-hosted platform where users can create repositories, collaborate, and access a range of features without managing infrastructure. In contrast, GitHub Enterprise allows organizations to deploy and maintain their own instance of GitHub on their private infrastructure. This self-hosted approach provides greater control and security over the development environment.
Scalability and User Limits: GitHub imposes certain limitations on the number of collaborators, repositories, and storage capacity based on the subscription plan. These limits may differ across plans, such as free, pro, or team. Conversely, GitHub Enterprise offers scalability that aligns with an organization's needs. It enables users to adjust the platform's capacity to accommodate a larger number of users, repositories, and data storage, making it suitable for enterprises and growing teams.
Security and Compliance: While GitHub ensures robust security measures for its cloud-based platform, organizations with strict security and compliance requirements may opt for GitHub Enterprise. With GitHub Enterprise, organizations can maintain their infrastructure and implement additional security measures to meet specific regulatory or compliance standards, ensuring data privacy and control.
Integration and Customization: GitHub provides integrations with various development tools and services to enhance workflows and collaboration. However, customization options are limited to the platform's features and configurations. In contrast, GitHub Enterprise allows organizations to customize the platform extensively. They can integrate it with their existing development ecosystem, incorporate custom functionality, and tailor the user experience to their specific requirements.
Support and Service Level Agreements (SLAs): GitHub provides assistance to users through channels such as documentation, community forums, and ticket-based support, with the level of support offered depending on the chosen subscription plan. For enterprise customers, GitHub Enterprise offers additional support choices and service level agreements (SLAs). These SLAs guarantee quicker response times, priority support, and dedicated assistance to resolve critical issues or meet specific requirements.

In summary, GitHub is a cloud-based platform that provides a user-friendly environment for version control and collaboration. It offers scalability, integration options, and streamlined workflows. GitHub Enterprise, as a self-hosted solution, provides organizations with greater control, scalability, customization capabilities, and dedicated support. It caters to enterprises seeking enhanced security, compliance, and the flexibility to tailor GitHub to their specific needs.

🔥 Trending in Code Collaboration on StackShare

GitHub

Code Collaboration

Powerful collaboration, review, and code management for open source and private development projects

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

137

259k

Advice on GitHub, GitHub Enterprise

Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

Pick the correct target branch
Make Drafts explicit
Name things properly
Ask help for tools
Remove the noise
Fetch necessary data
Understand Mergeability
Pass the message
Add screenshots
Be found in the future
Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitHub	GitHub Enterprise
GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.	GitHub Enterprise lets developers use the tools they love across the development process with support for popular IDEs, continuous integration tools, and hundreds of third party apps and services.
Command instructions; Source browser; Git powered wikis; Integrated issue tracking; Code reviews with inline comments; Compare view; Newsfeed; Followers; Developer profiles; Autocompletion for @username mentions	Compliance and auditing;Hundreds of integrations;Flexible deployment;Centralized permissions;Powerful dashboards;Technical support
Statistics
Stacks 295.5K	Stacks 500
Followers 259.0K	Followers 627
Votes 10.4K	Votes 10
Pros & Cons
Pros 1773 Open source friendly 1463 Easy source control 1254 Nice UI 1137 Great for team collaboration 868 Easy setup Cons 56 Owned by micrcosoft 38 Expensive for lone developers that want private repos 15 Relatively slow product/feature release cadence 10 API scoping could be better 9 Only 3 collaborators for private repos	Pros 4 Expensive - $$$ 2 CDCI with Github Actions 2 Code security 1 Draft Pull Request 1 Both Cloud and Enterprise Server Versions available Cons 2 $$$
Integrations
Grove Lighthouse Airbrake Codeship Bugsnag BugHerd Visual Studio Code HipChat CopperEgg Nitrous.IO	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to GitHub, GitHub Enterprise?

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.