GitLab CI vs Snap CI: What are the differences?

# Introduction
In this comparison, we will explore the key differences between GitLab CI and Snap CI.

1. **Hosting**: GitLab CI is self-hosted, allowing users to have complete control over their pipelines, while Snap CI is a cloud-hosted solution provided by ThoughtWorks Studios.
2. **Integration**: GitLab CI is tightly integrated with GitLab, providing seamless continuity between code repository and CI/CD pipelines, whereas Snap CI offers integrations with various version control systems and not limited to a specific provider.
3. **Pricing**: GitLab CI is included in GitLab's pricing plans, making it a cost-effective choice for organizations utilizing GitLab for both code repository and CI/CD pipelines, while Snap CI operates on a subscription-based pricing model, requiring separate payment for CI/CD services.
4. **Customization**: GitLab CI offers extensive customization options with the use of GitLab CI YML configuration files, enabling users to tailor their pipelines to specific requirements, whereas Snap CI provides a more simplistic approach with predefined pipelines and limited customization capabilities.
5. **Scalability**: GitLab CI is known for its scalability, allowing users to handle large projects and scale their CI/CD infrastructure as needed, while Snap CI may have limitations in scaling for extremely complex or high-volume projects.
6. **Community Support**: GitLab CI benefits from a large and active community, providing users with a vast array of resources, forums, and documentation for troubleshooting and sharing best practices, while Snap CI may have a smaller user base and fewer community-driven resources available.

In Summary, GitLab CI and Snap CI differ in hosting options, integration capabilities, pricing models, customization flexibility, scalability, and community support.