StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. Google Cloud Container Builder vs Portainer

Google Cloud Container Builder vs Portainer

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Portainer
Portainer
Stacks507
Followers842
Votes146
Google Cloud Container Builder
Google Cloud Container Builder
Stacks177
Followers198
Votes0

Google Cloud Container Builder vs Portainer: What are the differences?

## Key Differences Between Google Cloud Container Builder and Portainer

Google Cloud Container Builder is a fully managed service that allows you to build container images in a fast, consistent, and reliable manner. It is integrated with Google Cloud Platform, providing seamless integration with other GCP services. On the other hand, Portainer is an open-source, lightweight management UI that allows you to easily manage Docker environments. Portainer is more focused on providing a user-friendly interface for managing containers and applications.

## 1. Integration with Cloud Platform:
Google Cloud Container Builder offers seamless integration with other Google Cloud Platform services, providing a cohesive and unified development environment. In contrast, Portainer is designed to work with Docker environments and does not have native integration with cloud platforms.

## 2. Managed Service vs Open Source:
Google Cloud Container Builder is a managed service provided by Google Cloud, ensuring scalability, reliability, and security. Portainer, on the other hand, is an open-source project, allowing for more flexibility but requiring self-management and maintenance.

## 3. Build Automation:
Google Cloud Container Builder is focused on automating the process of building container images, allowing for faster and more efficient development cycles. Portainer, while providing a user-friendly interface for managing containers, does not have built-in features for automating the build process.

## 4. Pricing:
Google Cloud Container Builder follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model based on usage, with no additional fees for the service itself. Portainer, being an open-source project, is free to use but may require additional resources for maintenance and support.

## 5. Scalability:
Google Cloud Container Builder is designed to be highly scalable, capable of handling large-scale build processes and complex container image requirements. Portainer, being a lightweight management UI, may not offer the same level of scalability for managing large container environments.

## 6. Security and Compliance:
Google Cloud Container Builder provides built-in security features and compliance standards that are inherent in the Google Cloud Platform infrastructure. Portainer, being open-source software, may require additional security measures to ensure compliance with industry standards and regulations.

In Summary, Google Cloud Container Builder and Portainer differ in terms of integration with cloud platforms, management approach, automation capabilities, pricing model, scalability, and security features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Portainer
Portainer
Google Cloud Container Builder
Google Cloud Container Builder

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Run your container image builds in a fast, consistent, and reliable environment on Google Cloud Platform. Build in any language and package your build artifacts into Docker containers for deployment.

Docker management; Docker UI; Docker cluster management; Swarm visualizer; Authentication; User Access Control; Docker container management; Docker service management; Docker overview; Docker console; Docker swarm status; Docker image management; Docker network management; Docker dashboard; Remote HTTP API; Automation
-
Statistics
Stacks
507
Stacks
177
Followers
842
Followers
198
Votes
146
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 36
    Simple
  • 27
    Great UI
  • 19
    Friendly
  • 12
    Easy to setup, gives a practical interface for Docker
  • 11
    Because it just works, super simple yet powerful
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Docker Swarm
Docker Swarm
Docker Secrets
Docker Secrets
Auth0
Auth0
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Docker
Docker
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
GitHub
GitHub
Docker
Docker
Google Cloud Storage
Google Cloud Storage

What are some alternatives to Portainer, Google Cloud Container Builder?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Kitematic

Kitematic

Simple Docker App management for Mac OS X

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana