StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. Heroku vs Meteor Galaxy

Heroku vs Meteor Galaxy

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Heroku
Heroku
Stacks25.8K
Followers20.5K
Votes3.2K
Meteor Galaxy
Meteor Galaxy
Stacks35
Followers33
Votes0

Heroku vs Meteor Galaxy: What are the differences?

  1. Scalability: One key difference between Heroku and Meteor Galaxy is how they handle scalability. Heroku offers horizontal scalability by allowing users to scale their web dynos or worker processes easily. On the other hand, Meteor Galaxy provides vertical scalability by enabling users to scale their containers vertically as needed, providing more resources to a single container.

  2. Pricing Model: Another significant difference is the pricing model between Heroku and Meteor Galaxy. Heroku charges based on the resources consumed, such as dyno hours and add-ons, while Meteor Galaxy offers a flat rate based on the number of containers deployed. This difference in pricing models can affect the overall cost for users depending on their deployment needs.

  3. Deployment Process: Heroku and Meteor Galaxy also differ in their deployment processes. Heroku offers a simple git push deployment method, making it easy to deploy applications quickly. In contrast, Meteor Galaxy uses a more structured deployment process involving building and shipping containers, providing more control over the deployment process but requiring more setup.

  4. Add-Ons and Integrations: Heroku has a vast marketplace of add-ons and integrations to enhance the functionality of applications, offering a wide range of services from databases to monitoring tools. Meteor Galaxy, on the other hand, has a more limited selection of integrations, focusing more on providing a streamlined platform for deploying and managing Meteor applications.

  5. Community and Support: Heroku has a larger community and extensive documentation available, making it easier for users to find support and resources for troubleshooting. Meteor Galaxy, being a more specialized platform for Meteor applications, has a smaller community but provides dedicated support for Meteor-specific issues and challenges.

  6. Flexibility and Customization: Heroku offers more flexibility in terms of language support and customization, allowing users to deploy applications written in various programming languages. Meteor Galaxy, being tailored for Meteor applications, is more focused on providing a seamless deployment experience for Meteor projects, potentially limiting the flexibility for users with different tech stacks.

In Summary, Heroku and Meteor Galaxy differ in scalability options, pricing models, deployment processes, add-ons and integrations, community support, and flexibility for language support, catering to different needs and preferences of developers and businesses.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Heroku
Heroku
Meteor Galaxy
Meteor Galaxy

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

It is the platform-as-a-service built specifically for Meteor apps. Customers deploy Meteor apps to Galaxy containers which represent isolated compute environments.

Agile deployment for Ruby, Node.js, Clojure, Java, Python, Go and Scala.;Run and scale any type of app.;Total visibility across your entire app.;Erosion-resistant architecture. Rich control surfaces.
-
Statistics
Stacks
25.8K
Stacks
35
Followers
20.5K
Followers
33
Votes
3.2K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 703
    Easy deployment
  • 459
    Free for side projects
  • 374
    Huge time-saver
  • 348
    Simple scaling
  • 261
    Low devops skills required
Cons
  • 27
    Super expensive
  • 9
    Not a whole lot of flexibility
  • 7
    No usable MySQL option
  • 7
    Storage
  • 5
    Low performance on free tier
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Mailgun
Mailgun
Postmark
Postmark
Loggly
Loggly
Papertrail
Papertrail
Redis Cloud
Redis Cloud
Red Hat Codeready Workspaces
Red Hat Codeready Workspaces
Nitrous.IO
Nitrous.IO
Logentries
Logentries
MongoLab
MongoLab
Gemfury
Gemfury
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Heroku, Meteor Galaxy?

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

PythonAnywhere

PythonAnywhere

It's somewhat unique. A small PaaS that supports web apps (Python only) as well as scheduled jobs with shell access. It is an expensive way to tinker and run several small apps.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase