StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. Kubernetes vs kubectl flame

Kubernetes vs kubectl flame

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Stacks61.2K
Followers52.8K
Votes685
kubectl flame
kubectl flame
Stacks0
Followers7
Votes0

Kubernetes vs kubectl flame: What are the differences?

Kubernetes vs kubectl: Key Differences

  1. Purpose: Kubernetes is an open-source container orchestration platform that automates the deployment, scaling, and management of containerized applications, whereas kubectl is a command-line utility used for interacting with Kubernetes clusters.

  2. Scope of Control: Kubernetes manages the entire containerized application deployment lifecycle, including scaling, load balancing, and resource allocation, while kubectl is focused on providing a way to communicate with the Kubernetes API server to execute specific commands on the cluster.

  3. User Interface: Kubernetes provides a graphical user interface (GUI) for managing and monitoring clusters, workloads, and resources through the Kubernetes dashboard, while kubectl operates through a command-line interface (CLI) for executing commands directly against the Kubernetes API.

  4. Flexibility: Kubernetes allows for complex declarative configurations using resource definitions such as pods, services, deployments, and namespaces, offering fine-grained control over the deployment process, whereas kubectl enables users to interact with the Kubernetes system more directly and quickly through imperative commands.

  5. Access Control: In Kubernetes, access control and permissions management can be finely tuned through role-based access control (RBAC) configurations, allowing for granular control over user permissions within the cluster, while kubectl relies on the user's authentication credentials and permissions granted by Kubernetes.

  6. Scalability: Kubernetes provides built-in scaling mechanisms for automatically adjusting resources based on workload demands, ensuring optimal performance and resource utilization, whereas kubectl requires manual intervention for scaling operations, which may be less efficient for larger deployments.

In Summary, Kubernetes and kubectl serve distinct roles in the container orchestration landscape, with Kubernetes offering a comprehensive platform for managing containerized applications at scale, while kubectl provides a streamlined interface for interacting with Kubernetes clusters using command-line operations.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Kubernetes
Kubernetes
kubectl flame
kubectl flame

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Kubectl plugin for effortless profiling on kubernetes. It allows you to profile production applications with low-overhead by generating FlameGraphs. Running it does not require any modification to existing pods.

Lightweight, simple and accessible;Built for a multi-cloud world, public, private or hybrid;Highly modular, designed so that all of its components are easily swappable
Profiling Kubernetes Pod; Profiling Alpine based container; Profiling sidecar container
Statistics
Stacks
61.2K
Stacks
0
Followers
52.8K
Followers
7
Votes
685
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 166
    Leading docker container management solution
  • 130
    Simple and powerful
  • 108
    Open source
  • 76
    Backed by google
  • 58
    The right abstractions
Cons
  • 16
    Steep learning curve
  • 15
    Poor workflow for development
  • 8
    Orchestrates only infrastructure
  • 4
    High resource requirements for on-prem clusters
  • 2
    Too heavy for simple systems
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Vagrant
Vagrant
Docker
Docker
Rackspace Cloud Servers
Rackspace Cloud Servers
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
Google Compute Engine
Google Compute Engine
Ansible
Ansible
Google Kubernetes Engine
Google Kubernetes Engine
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Kubernetes, kubectl flame?

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Kitematic

Kitematic

Simple Docker App management for Mac OS X

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana