Kubestack vs Tutum

Overview

Tutum

Stacks61

Followers74

Votes235

Kubestack

Stacks4

Followers7

Votes0

GitHub Stars698

Forks100

Kubestack vs Tutum: What are the differences?

Integration with Kubernetes Versions: Kubestack allows compatibility with different versions of Kubernetes, providing flexibility and ease in managing clusters across different environments. In contrast, Tutum may have limitations and dependencies on specific versions, restricting the adaptability to various Kubernetes setups.
Management of Configuration: Kubestack offers advanced configuration management capabilities, allowing users to streamline and automate the process of defining and maintaining configurations for Kubernetes resources. On the other hand, Tutum may lack the robustness in configuration management, leading to potential manual errors or inefficiencies in resource allocation.
Support for Customizations: Kubestack supports extensive customization options, enabling users to tailor Kubernetes configurations to meet specific requirements and preferences. In comparison, Tutum may have limited support for customizations, which could hinder the ability to optimize Kubernetes setups for unique use cases or workloads.
Scalability and Cluster Management: Kubestack offers scalable solutions for cluster management, facilitating the efficient scaling of Kubernetes resources based on demand and workload variations. Tutum may have restrictions in scalability and cluster management capabilities, potentially resulting in challenges when handling large or dynamic workloads.
Community and Support: Kubestack provides a robust community and support system, offering resources such as forums, documentation, and user groups to assist users in troubleshooting issues and optimizing their Kubernetes deployments. Tutum's community and support may be less extensive or responsive, which could impact the accessibility of help and guidance for users.
User Interface and Accessibility: Kubestack may offer a user-friendly and intuitive interface for managing Kubernetes resources, enhancing the overall user experience and simplifying the deployment and monitoring processes. In contrast, Tutum's interface and accessibility features might be less user-centric or adaptable, potentially leading to complexities in navigation and utilization for users.

In Summary, Kubestack stands out with its compatibility, advanced configuration management, customization support, scalability, community, and user-friendly interface compared to Tutum.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Tutum	Kubestack
Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.	Everything you need to build reliable automation for AKS, EKS and GKE Kubernetes clusters in one free and open-source framework.
Deploy from Docker Hub; Free private Docker registry; CLI Tool; Private Links; Dynamic Links; RESTful API; Edit & Redeploy; Jumpstarts & Quickstarts; Webhooks; Bring your own node; Data volumes; Amazon Web Services; Digital Ocean; Microsoft Azure;	From local development to mission critical production; GitOps controlled infrastructure and cluster services; Decoupled infrastructure and application environments; Multi-cluster, multi-region and multi-cloud
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 698
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 100
Stacks 61	Stacks 4
Followers 74	Followers 7
Votes 235	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 35 Awesome user interface 28 Free private docker registry 24 Its super easy 24 Docker public index integration 21 Friendly support	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Docker MongoDB MariaDB MySQL DigitalOcean Memcached RabbitMQ PostgreSQL Riak WordPress	Terraform Azure Kubernetes Service Amazon EKS Google Cloud Platform Google Kubernetes Engine Microsoft Azure

What are some alternatives to Tutum, Kubestack?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

ngrok

ngrok is a reverse proxy that creates a secure tunnel between from a public endpoint to a locally running web service. ngrok captures and analyzes all traffic over the tunnel for later inspection and replay.

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Related Comparisons

Kubestack vs Tutum: What are the differences?

Integration with Kubernetes Versions: Kubestack allows compatibility with different versions of Kubernetes, providing flexibility and ease in managing clusters across different environments. In contrast, Tutum may have limitations and dependencies on specific versions, restricting the adaptability to various Kubernetes setups.
Management of Configuration: Kubestack offers advanced configuration management capabilities, allowing users to streamline and automate the process of defining and maintaining configurations for Kubernetes resources. On the other hand, Tutum may lack the robustness in configuration management, leading to potential manual errors or inefficiencies in resource allocation.
Support for Customizations: Kubestack supports extensive customization options, enabling users to tailor Kubernetes configurations to meet specific requirements and preferences. In comparison, Tutum may have limited support for customizations, which could hinder the ability to optimize Kubernetes setups for unique use cases or workloads.
Scalability and Cluster Management: Kubestack offers scalable solutions for cluster management, facilitating the efficient scaling of Kubernetes resources based on demand and workload variations. Tutum may have restrictions in scalability and cluster management capabilities, potentially resulting in challenges when handling large or dynamic workloads.
Community and Support: Kubestack provides a robust community and support system, offering resources such as forums, documentation, and user groups to assist users in troubleshooting issues and optimizing their Kubernetes deployments. Tutum's community and support may be less extensive or responsive, which could impact the accessibility of help and guidance for users.
User Interface and Accessibility: Kubestack may offer a user-friendly and intuitive interface for managing Kubernetes resources, enhancing the overall user experience and simplifying the deployment and monitoring processes. In contrast, Tutum's interface and accessibility features might be less user-centric or adaptable, potentially leading to complexities in navigation and utilization for users.

In Summary, Kubestack stands out with its compatibility, advanced configuration management, customization support, scalability, community, and user-friendly interface compared to Tutum.

Kubestack vs Tutum

Overview