StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Browser Testing
  5. Testim vs mabl

Testim vs mabl

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Testim
Testim
Stacks34
Followers57
Votes0
mabl
mabl
Stacks28
Followers55
Votes0

Testim vs mabl: What are the differences?

Introduction

When choosing between Testim and mabl for your automated testing needs, it is crucial to understand the key differences between the two platforms. Both Testim and mabl offer powerful testing solutions, but they also have distinct features that set them apart. Let's explore the key differences between Testim and mabl.

  1. Codeless Testing: Testim is known for its codeless testing approach, allowing users to create and execute tests without writing any code. This makes test creation faster and more accessible to team members with limited coding experience. In contrast, mabl also offers codeless testing capabilities but integrates seamlessly with existing code for more advanced customization.

  2. Machine Learning Algorithms: mabl stands out with its extensive use of machine learning algorithms for test creation, maintenance, and analysis. This allows mabl to adapt to changes in the user interface and provide intelligent insights into your testing results. Testim, while providing AI-driven suggestions for test improvements, does not leverage machine learning as extensively as mabl.

  3. Cross-Browser Testing: Testim offers robust cross-browser testing capabilities, allowing users to test their applications across different browsers and devices effortlessly. On the other hand, mabl focuses more on end-to-end testing scenarios, making it a preferred choice for testing complex user flows rather than individual browser compatibility.

In Summary, understanding the differences between Testim and mabl can help you choose the right automated testing solution based on your specific requirements and preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Testim
Testim
mabl
mabl

It uses artificial intelligence to speed-up the authoring, execution, and maintenance of automated tests.

Mabl is the leading intelligent test automation platform built for CI/CD. Integrate automated end-to-end testing into your development lifecycle.

Super fast authoring; Machine learning based self-maintenance; Efficiency at scale; Fast, scalable test runs
Fast easy setup; Machine driven regression testing; Auto-healing tests; Fully managed; Secure; Visual Inspection
Statistics
Stacks
34
Stacks
28
Followers
57
Followers
55
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Travis CI
Travis CI
GitHub
GitHub
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Jira
Jira
TeamCity
TeamCity
Slack
Slack
Codeship
Codeship
Trello
Trello
Jenkins
Jenkins
StrongLoop
StrongLoop
Jira
Jira
Bamboo
Bamboo
GitLab
GitLab
Codeship
Codeship
Postman
Postman
Travis CI
Travis CI
Jenkins
Jenkins
GitHub
GitHub
Slack
Slack
Segment
Segment

What are some alternatives to Testim, mabl?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

TestingBot

TestingBot

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Ghost Inspector

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana