StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. MongoDB Stitch vs Nanobox

MongoDB Stitch vs Nanobox

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Nanobox
Nanobox
Stacks12
Followers20
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.6K
Forks92
MongoDB Stitch
MongoDB Stitch
Stacks133
Followers231
Votes4

MongoDB Stitch vs Nanobox: What are the differences?

MongoDB Stitch: Backend as a Service for web and mobile applications. MongoDB Stitch lets developers focus on building applications rather than on managing data manipulation code, service integration, or backend infrastructure. Stitch lets you focus on building the app users want, not on writing boilerplate backend logic; Nanobox: The Ideal Platform for Developers. Nanobox is the ideal platform for developers allowing you to focus on code, not config, by removing the need to deal with environment configuration and dev-ops complexity.

MongoDB Stitch and Nanobox can be categorized as "Platform as a Service" tools.

Some of the features offered by MongoDB Stitch are:

  • REST API to MongoDB Atlas
  • Declarative data access controls
  • Service integrations (AWS S3, Twilio...)

On the other hand, Nanobox provides the following key features:

  • Easy to setup
  • Robust dashboard
  • Application monitoring

Nanobox is an open source tool with 1.36K GitHub stars and 73 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Nanobox's open source repository on GitHub.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Nanobox
Nanobox
MongoDB Stitch
MongoDB Stitch

Nanobox is the ideal platform for developers allowing you to focus on code, not config, by removing the need to deal with environment configuration and dev-ops complexity.

MongoDB Stitch lets developers focus on building applications rather than on managing data manipulation code, service integration, or backend infrastructure. Stitch lets you focus on building the app users want, not on writing boilerplate backend logic.

Easy to setup;Robust dashboard;Application monitoring;Logs;Ability to manage individual servers;Ability to deploy on your own cloud or private servers;Easy, automated SSL certificate issue process;Components of apps containerized together;Simple and predictable pricing;Ability to control overall costs compared with competitors
REST API to MongoDB Atlas;Declarative data access controls;Service integrations (AWS S3, Twilio...);WebHooks;REST-like API for JavaScript, Android and iOS clients
Statistics
GitHub Stars
1.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
92
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
12
Stacks
133
Followers
20
Followers
231
Votes
0
Votes
4
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 2
    Static Hosting
  • 1
    Serverless
  • 1
    Best integration with MongoDB (Atlas)
Integrations
Java
Java
Rust
Rust
Docker
Docker
Perl
Perl
Scala
Scala
Elixir
Elixir
GitHub
GitHub
MongoDB Atlas
MongoDB Atlas
Twilio
Twilio
Amazon SQS
Amazon SQS
Mailgun
Mailgun
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Slack
Slack
Amazon SES
Amazon SES
PubNub
PubNub
Google Cloud Messaging
Google Cloud Messaging

What are some alternatives to Nanobox, MongoDB Stitch?

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase