StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Messaging
  4. Group Chat And Notifications
  5. Openfire vs Riot.im

Openfire vs Riot.im

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Openfire
Openfire
Stacks12
Followers47
Votes0
Riot.im
Riot.im
Stacks21
Followers36
Votes6

Openfire vs Riot.im : What are the differences?

Introduction

Openfire and Riot.im are both communication platforms that offer different features and functionalities. Here are key differences between Openfire and Riot.im.

1. Scalability:

Openfire is a scalable real-time collaboration server that can be easily customized and extended, making it suitable for large organizations with complex communication needs. On the other hand, Riot.im is a more user-friendly platform focused on providing secure and simple communication tools, making it ideal for small to medium-sized teams looking for a straightforward solution.

2. Integration Capabilities:

Openfire offers extensive integration capabilities, making it easy to connect with other applications, services, and platforms to streamline communication processes. Riot.im, on the other hand, focuses on providing a seamless integration with Matrix, a decentralized communication protocol, allowing users to experience unified messaging across different platforms.

3. Customization Options:

Openfire provides a high level of customization options, allowing users to tailor the platform to their specific communication needs with plugins, themes, and other extensions. In contrast, Riot.im offers more limited customization features, focusing on providing a consistent and user-friendly interface for all users.

4. Administration and Management:

Openfire offers robust administration and management features, making it easy to control user access, roles, permissions, and other settings for efficient communication management. Riot.im, on the other hand, simplifies the administration process by providing a more intuitive and straightforward user interface, making it easier for non-technical users to navigate and utilize the platform.

5. Collaboration Tools:

Openfire provides a comprehensive set of collaboration tools, including chat, file sharing, video conferencing, and more, making it a versatile platform for various communication needs. Riot.im, on the other hand, focuses on providing a clean and simple interface with essential collaboration tools, catering to users who prioritize ease of use and simplicity in their communication platform.

6. Security Features:

Openfire offers robust security features, including encryption, authentication mechanisms, and compliance options, ensuring that communication data is secure and protected. Riot.im also emphasizes security, offering end-to-end encryption and secure file-sharing options to protect user data and maintain privacy during communication sessions.

In Summary, Openfire and Riot.im offer distinct communication solutions tailored to different organizational needs, with Openfire focusing on scalability and customization, while Riot.im prioritizes user-friendly interface and integration with decentralized communication protocols.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Openfire
Openfire
Riot.im
Riot.im

It is a real time collaboration (RTC) server. It uses the only widely adopted open protocol for instant messaging, XMPP (also called Jabber). It is incredibly easy to setup and administer, but offers rock-solid security and performance.

It supports end to end encryption, groups, channels and sharing of files between users, also registration does not require a phone number.

Instant messaging; Rock-solid security and performance; Easy to setup
More than simple chat. Custom Communication; Choose who you trust with your data; Security; Voice & Video Conferencing; Share Files; Intelligent Notifications; Other Apps, Stickers, Widgets & Bots; Bridge other apps and networks.
Statistics
Stacks
12
Stacks
21
Followers
47
Followers
36
Votes
0
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 2
    Open source
  • 2
    Behind firewall
  • 1
    Mobile app for andori
  • 1
    Mobile app for android and IOS, Also web-based app
Cons
  • 1
    Deactivated users file remain on server
  • 1
    There is no admin UI. Very hard to moderate
  • 1
    You can not delete users
Integrations
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
Node.js
Node.js
Windows
Windows
Linux
Linux
IPFS
IPFS
macOS
macOS
drawio
drawio
Pipedrive
Pipedrive
Slack
Slack
Zapier
Zapier
Asana
Asana
Weebly
Weebly
Basecamp
Basecamp
Wix
Wix

What are some alternatives to Openfire, Riot.im ?

Slack

Slack

Imagine all your team communication in one place, instantly searchable, available wherever you go. That’s Slack. All your messages. All your files. And everything from Twitter, Dropbox, Google Docs, Asana, Trello, GitHub and dozens of other services. All together.

HipChat

HipChat

HipChat is a hosted private chat service for your company or team. Invite colleagues to share ideas and files in persistent group chat rooms. Get your team off AIM, Google Talk, and Skype — HipChat was built for business.

Zulip

Zulip

Zulip is powerful, open source team chat that combines the immediacy of real-time chat with the productivity benefits of threaded conversations. Zulip allows busy managers and others in meetings all day to participate in their teams chats.

RocketChat

RocketChat

Rocket.Chat is a Web Chat Server, developed in JavaScript, using the Meteor fullstack framework. It is a great solution for communities and companies wanting to privately host their own chat service or for developers looking forward to build and evolve their own chat platforms.

Mattermost

Mattermost

Mattermost is modern communication from behind your firewall.

Gitter

Gitter

Free chat rooms for your public repositories. A bit like IRC only smarter. Chats for private repositories as well as organisations.

Flowdock

Flowdock

Flowdock is a web-based team chat service that integrates with your tools to provide a window into your team's activities. With the team inbox, everyone on your team can stay up to date. Stay connected with Flowdock's iOS and Android apps.

Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams

See content and chat history anytime, including team chats with Skype that are visible to the whole team. Private group chats are available for smaller group conversations.

Telegram

Telegram

Users can send messages and exchange photos, videos, stickers, audio and files of any type. It provides instant messaging, simple, fast, secure and synced across all your devices.

Keybase Teams

Keybase Teams

Keybase is for anyone. Imagine a Slack for the whole world, except end-to-end encrypted across all your devices. Or a Team Dropbox where the server can't leak your files or be hacked.

Related Comparisons

HipChat
Slack

HipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack

Litmus
Email on Acid

Email on Acid vs Litmus

InVision
Proto.io

InVision vs Marvel vs Proto.io

Webex
Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Slack
RocketChat

Mattermost vs RocketChat vs Slack