Alternatives to Passport logo

Alternatives to Passport

Auth0, Amazon Cognito, OAuth2, Spring Security, and Keycloak are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Passport.
177
233
+ 1
0

What is Passport and what are its top alternatives?

It is authentication middleware for Node.js. Extremely flexible and modular, It can be unobtrusively dropped in to any Express-based web application. A comprehensive set of strategies support authentication using a username and password, Facebook, Twitter, and more.
Passport is a tool in the User Management and Authentication category of a tech stack.
Passport is an open source tool with 18.6K GitHub stars and 1.1K GitHub forks. Here’s a link to Passport's open source repository on GitHub

Top Alternatives to Passport

  • Auth0

    Auth0

    A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications. ...

  • Amazon Cognito

    Amazon Cognito

    You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline. ...

  • OAuth2

    OAuth2

    It is an authorization framework that enables a third-party application to obtain limited access to an HTTP service, either on behalf of a resource owner by orchestrating an approval interaction between the resource owner and the HTTP service, or by allowing the third-party application to obtain access on its own behalf. ...

  • Spring Security

    Spring Security

    It is a framework that focuses on providing both authentication and authorization to Java applications. The real power of Spring Security is found in how easily it can be extended to meet custom requirements. ...

  • Keycloak

    Keycloak

    It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box. ...

  • Firebase Authentication

    Firebase Authentication

    It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google, ...

  • Devise

    Devise

    Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

  • JSON Web Token

    JSON Web Token

    JSON Web Token is an open standard that defines a compact and self-contained way for securely transmitting information between parties as a JSON object. This information can be verified and trusted because it is digitally signed. ...

Passport alternatives & related posts

Auth0 logo

Auth0

945
1.3K
179
Token-based Single Sign On for your Apps and APIs with social, databases and enterprise identities
945
1.3K
+ 1
179
PROS OF AUTH0
  • 57
    JSON web token
  • 27
    Integration with 20+ Social Providers
  • 16
    SDKs
  • 16
    It's a universal solution
  • 12
    Amazing Documentation
  • 10
    Heroku Add-on
  • 8
    Enterprise support
  • 7
    Extend platform with "rules"
  • 6
    Great Sample Repos
  • 4
    Azure Add-on
  • 3
    Passwordless
  • 2
    It can integrate seamlessly with firebase
  • 2
    Polished
  • 2
    On-premise deployment
  • 1
    Ruby
  • 1
    Easy integration, non-intrusive identity provider
  • 1
    Will sign BAA for HIPAA-compliance
  • 1
    SOC2
  • 1
    Great support
  • 1
    Active Directory support
  • 1
    great documentation, samples, UX and Angular support
  • 0
    A';P[];Æ`/
CONS OF AUTH0
  • 9
    Pricing too high (Developer Pro)
  • 7
    Poor support
  • 4
    Status page not reflect actual status
  • 3
    Rapidly changing API

related Auth0 posts

I'm starting a new React Native project and trying to decide on an auth provider. Currently looking at Auth0 and Amazon Cognito. It will need to play nice with a Django Rest Framework backend.

See more
Amazon Cognito logo

Amazon Cognito

399
593
30
Securely manage and synchronize app data for your users across their mobile devices
399
593
+ 1
30
PROS OF AMAZON COGNITO
  • 13
    Backed by Amazon
  • 7
    Manage Unique Identities
  • 3
    Work Offline
  • 2
    Store and Sync
  • 1
    It works
  • 1
    Integrate with Google, Amazon, Twitter, Facebook, SAML
  • 1
    SDKs and code samples
  • 1
    Free for first 50000 users
  • 1
    MFA
CONS OF AMAZON COGNITO
  • 2
    Massive Pain to get working
  • 1
    Documentation often out of date
  • 1
    Login-UI sparsely customizable (e.g. no translation)

related Amazon Cognito posts

I'm starting a new React Native project and trying to decide on an auth provider. Currently looking at Auth0 and Amazon Cognito. It will need to play nice with a Django Rest Framework backend.

See more
OAuth2 logo

OAuth2

362
360
0
An open standard for access delegation
362
360
+ 1
0
PROS OF OAUTH2
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF OAUTH2
      Be the first to leave a con

      related OAuth2 posts

      Joshua Dean Küpper
      CEO at Scrayos UG (haftungsbeschränkt) · | 7 upvotes · 200.5K views

      As the access to our global REST-API "Charon" is bound to OAuth2, we use Keycloak inside Quarkus to authenticate and authorize users of our API. It is not possible to perform any un-authenticated requests against this API, so we wanted to make really sure that the authentication/authorization component is absolutely reliable and tested. We found those attributes within Keycloak, so we used it.

      See more
      Isaac Ogunleye
      Backend Developer at Coast research Institute · | 5 upvotes · 8.8K views
      Shared insights
      on
      PassportPassportOAuth2OAuth2

      My teammates and I are arguing on which library to use for our local and social authentication in our express app between OAuth2 and Passport. I went for Passport cause I personally like it, and it seems easier to implement with good docs, but some of my teammates think it's less secure than OAuth2. So any advice please would be appreciated. Thanks 🙏🏻

      See more
      Spring Security logo

      Spring Security

      338
      324
      2
      A powerful and highly customizable authentication and access-control framework
      338
      324
      + 1
      2
      PROS OF SPRING SECURITY
      • 1
        Java integration
      • 1
        Easy to use
      CONS OF SPRING SECURITY
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Spring Security posts

        Keycloak logo

        Keycloak

        318
        602
        53
        An open source identity and access management solution
        318
        602
        + 1
        53
        PROS OF KEYCLOAK
        • 21
          It's a open source solution
        • 13
          Supports multiple identity provider
        • 10
          OpenID and SAML support
        • 5
          Easy customisation
        • 4
          JSON web token
        CONS OF KEYCLOAK
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Keycloak posts

          Joshua Dean Küpper
          CEO at Scrayos UG (haftungsbeschränkt) · | 7 upvotes · 200.5K views

          As the access to our global REST-API "Charon" is bound to OAuth2, we use Keycloak inside Quarkus to authenticate and authorize users of our API. It is not possible to perform any un-authenticated requests against this API, so we wanted to make really sure that the authentication/authorization component is absolutely reliable and tested. We found those attributes within Keycloak, so we used it.

          See more
          Firebase Authentication logo

          Firebase Authentication

          300
          384
          25
          An App Authentication System In A Few Lines Of Code
          300
          384
          + 1
          25
          PROS OF FIREBASE AUTHENTICATION
          • 6
            Completely Free
          • 4
            Passwordless
          • 4
            Email/Password
          • 3
            Works seemlessly with other Firebase Services
          • 2
            Anonymous Users
          • 2
            Easy to Integrate and Manage
          • 2
            Native App + Web integrations
          • 2
            Integration with OAuth Providers
          CONS OF FIREBASE AUTHENTICATION
          • 1
            Heavy webpack

          related Firebase Authentication posts

          Vue.js vuex Quasar Framework Firebase Firebase Authentication Cloud Firestore Electron Apache Cordova

          I'm developing my new project with the Quasar framework on the front end and Firebase services on the backend.

          See more
          Devise logo

          Devise

          289
          210
          56
          Flexible authentication solution for Rails with Warden
          289
          210
          + 1
          56
          PROS OF DEVISE
          • 33
            Reliable
          • 17
            Open Source
          • 4
            Support for neo4j database
          • 2
            Secure
          CONS OF DEVISE
            Be the first to leave a con

            related Devise posts

            Jerome Dalbert
            Senior Backend Engineer at StackShare · | 5 upvotes · 235.8K views
            Shared insights
            on
            OmniAuthOmniAuthDeviseDeviseRubyRuby
            at

            We use OmniAuth with Devise to authenticate users via Twitter, GitHub, Bitbucket and Gitlab. Adding a new OmniAuth authentication provider is basically as easy as adding a new Ruby gem!

            The only drawback I could see is that your OmniAuth+Devise OmniauthCallbacksController redirection logic can easily get hairy over time. So you have to be vigilant to keep it in check.

            See more
            JSON Web Token logo

            JSON Web Token

            282
            153
            0
            A JSON-based open standard for creating access tokens
            282
            153
            + 1
            0
            PROS OF JSON WEB TOKEN
              Be the first to leave a pro
              CONS OF JSON WEB TOKEN
                Be the first to leave a con

                related JSON Web Token posts

                Repost

                Overview: To put it simply, we plan to use the MERN stack to build our web application. MongoDB will be used as our primary database. We will use ExpressJS alongside Node.js to set up our API endpoints. Additionally, we plan to use React to build our SPA on the client side and use Redis on the server side as our primary caching solution. Initially, while working on the project, we plan to deploy our server and client both on Heroku . However, Heroku is very limited and we will need the benefits of an Infrastructure as a Service so we will use Amazon EC2 to later deploy our final version of the application.

                Serverside: nodemon will allow us to automatically restart a running instance of our node app when files changes take place. We decided to use MongoDB because it is a non relational database which uses the Document Object Model. This allows a lot of flexibility as compared to a RDMS like SQL which requires a very structural model of data that does not change too much. Another strength of MongoDB is its ease in scalability. We will use Mongoose along side MongoDB to model our application data. Additionally, we will host our MongoDB cluster remotely on MongoDB Atlas. Bcrypt will be used to encrypt user passwords that will be stored in the DB. This is to avoid the risks of storing plain text passwords. Moreover, we will use Cloudinary to store images uploaded by the user. We will also use the Twilio SendGrid API to enable automated emails sent by our application. To protect private API endpoints, we will use JSON Web Token and Passport. Also, PayPal will be used as a payment gateway to accept payments from users.

                Client Side: As mentioned earlier, we will use React to build our SPA. React uses a virtual DOM which is very efficient in rendering a page. Also React will allow us to reuse components. Furthermore, it is very popular and there is a large community that uses React so it can be helpful if we run into issues. We also plan to make a cross platform mobile application later and using React will allow us to reuse a lot of our code with React Native. Redux will be used to manage state. Redux works great with React and will help us manage a global state in the app and avoid the complications of each component having its own state. Additionally, we will use Bootstrap components and custom CSS to style our app.

                Other: Git will be used for version control. During the later stages of our project, we will use Google Analytics to collect useful data regarding user interactions. Moreover, Slack will be our primary communication tool. Also, we will use Visual Studio Code as our primary code editor because it is very light weight and has a wide variety of extensions that will boost productivity. Postman will be used to interact with and debug our API endpoints.

                See more

                Overview: To put it simply, we plan to use the MERN stack to build our web application. MongoDB will be used as our primary database. We will use ExpressJS alongside Node.js to set up our API endpoints. Additionally, we plan to use React to build our SPA on the client side and use Redis on the server side as our primary caching solution. Initially, while working on the project, we plan to deploy our server and client both on Heroku. However, Heroku is very limited and we will need the benefits of an Infrastructure as a Service so we will use Amazon EC2 to later deploy our final version of the application.

                Serverside: nodemon will allow us to automatically restart a running instance of our node app when files changes take place. We decided to use MongoDB because it is a non relational database which uses the Document Object Model. This allows a lot of flexibility as compared to a RDMS like SQL which requires a very structural model of data that does not change too much. Another strength of MongoDB is its ease in scalability. We will use Mongoose along side MongoDB to model our application data. Additionally, we will host our MongoDB cluster remotely on MongoDB Atlas. Bcrypt will be used to encrypt user passwords that will be stored in the DB. This is to avoid the risks of storing plain text passwords. Moreover, we will use Cloudinary to store images uploaded by the user. We will also use the Twilio SendGrid API to enable automated emails sent by our application. To protect private API endpoints, we will use JSON Web Token and Passport. Also, PayPal will be used as a payment gateway to accept payments from users.

                Client Side: As mentioned earlier, we will use React to build our SPA. React uses a virtual DOM which is very efficient in rendering a page. Also React will allow us to reuse components. Furthermore, it is very popular and there is a large community that uses React so it can be helpful if we run into issues. We also plan to make a cross platform mobile application later and using React will allow us to reuse a lot of our code with React Native. Redux will be used to manage state. Redux works great with React and will help us manage a global state in the app and avoid the complications of each component having its own state. Additionally, we will use Bootstrap components and custom CSS to style our app.

                Other: Git will be used for version control. During the later stages of our project, we will use Google Analytics to collect useful data regarding user interactions. Moreover, Slack will be our primary communication tool. Also, we will use Visual Studio Code as our primary code editor because it is very light weight and has a wide variety of extensions that will boost productivity. Postman will be used to interact with and debug our API endpoints.

                See more