StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. PullReview vs Stylelint

PullReview vs Stylelint

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

PullReview
PullReview
Stacks7
Followers65
Votes70
Stylelint
Stylelint
Stacks1.6K
Followers100
Votes6
GitHub Stars11.4K
Forks986

PullReview vs Stylelint: What are the differences?

  1. Integration: PullReview is a code review tool that integrates directly into your GitHub workflow, providing automated feedback on code quality, performance, and security. On the other hand, Stylelint is a linter for analyzing CSS code, ensuring adherence to coding standards and style guidelines.
  2. Scope: PullReview offers a broader scope by analyzing various aspects of your codebase, including code complexity, security vulnerabilities, and performance optimizations. In contrast, Stylelint focuses specifically on CSS syntax and style rules.
  3. Customization: PullReview allows for customizable rules and configurations based on your project requirements and code standards. In contrast, Stylelint provides predefined rulesets that can be extended or modified to fit your CSS coding style.
  4. Recommendations: PullReview provides actionable recommendations and suggestions to improve code quality and maintainability. On the other hand, Stylelint primarily identifies and flags issues without offering specific suggestions for improvement.
  5. Automation: PullReview automates the code review process by identifying issues automatically and providing feedback in real-time, streamlining the development workflow. Meanwhile, Stylelint requires manual invocation to analyze CSS files and report any violations.
  6. Language Support: PullReview supports multiple programming languages, making it versatile for various projects, while Stylelint is specifically designed for CSS linting, limiting its application to CSS files only.

In Summary, PullReview offers a comprehensive code review solution with integration capabilities and customizable options, while Stylelint specializes in CSS code analysis with predefined rulesets and manual invocation for checking CSS files.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on PullReview, Stylelint

Carlos
Carlos

Mar 14, 2020

Needs adviceonPrettierPrettierESLintESLintgulpgulp

Scenario: I want to integrate Prettier in our code base which is currently using ESLint (for .js and .scss both). The project is using gulp.

It doesn't feel quite right to me to use ESLint, I wonder if it would be better to use Stylelint or Sass Lint instead.

I completed integrating ESLint + Prettier, Planning to do the same with [ Stylelint || Sasslint || EsLint] + Prettier.

And have gulp 'fix' on file save (Watcher).

Any recommendation is appreciated.

465k views465k
Comments
Budi
Budi

Programmer

Aug 19, 2020

Review

I think you scan skip MongoDB for now and focussing on creating web component with Reactjs or Vue, I would also recommend to use TypeScript for type hinting support.

For styling, learn CSS first then upgrade to SASS/SCSS or LESS (pick one as mostly same concept) to make CSS more maintainable.

Also to improve your skill on both sectors, install linters if available. For TypeScipt, there are TSLint and for styling, i think there are Stylint. Linter will help you adapt to make a clean code and understand how other peoples usually styled their code.

41.6k views41.6k
Comments
Alex
Alex

Software Engineer

Aug 7, 2020

Review

you don't actually have to choose between these tools as they have vastly different purposes. i think its more a matter of understanding how to use them.

while eslint and stylelint are used to notify you about code quality issues, to guide you to write better code, prettier automatically handles code formatting (without notifying me). nothing else.

prettier and eslint both officially discourage using the eslint-plugin-prettier way, as these tools actually do very different things. autofixing with linters on watch isnt a great idea either. auto-fixing should only be done intentionally. you're not alone though, as a lot of devs set this up wrong.

i encourage you to think about what problem you're trying to solve and configure accordingly.

for my teams i set it up like this:

  • eslint, stylelint, prettier locally installed for cli use and ide support
  • eslint config prettier (code formatting rules are not eslints business, so dont warn me about it)
  • vscode workspace config: format on save
  • separate npm scripts for linting, and formatting
  • precommit hooks (husky)

so you can easily integrate with gulp. its just js after all ;)

159k views159k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

PullReview
PullReview
Stylelint
Stylelint

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

A mighty, modern CSS linter that helps you enforce consistent conventions and avoid errors in your stylesheets.

Review of Ruby and Javascript; Review on feature branches; Review on integrations branches; Detection of HotSpots; Security checks; Duplication checks; Test checks; Style checks; Complexity checks; Code Smells checks; Design checks; Notifications; Customization per repository; Team management and setup;
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
11.4K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
986
Stacks
7
Stacks
1.6K
Followers
65
Followers
100
Votes
70
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 18
    Very detailed review of my code
  • 10
    Useful
  • 9
    Github integration
  • 7
    Feels like a teacher is helping me
  • 5
    Up to date inspections
Pros
  • 5
    Great way to lint your CSS or SCSS
  • 1
    Only complains about real problems
Integrations
Jenkins
Jenkins
CircleCI
CircleCI
GitLab
GitLab
Travis CI
Travis CI
Slack
Slack
Ruby
Ruby
Rails
Rails
Codeship
Codeship
JavaScript
JavaScript
Flowdock
Flowdock
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to PullReview, Stylelint?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana