Ranorex Studio vs Selenide

Overview

Selenide

Stacks56

Followers85

Votes16

GitHub Stars0

Forks0

Ranorex Studio

Stacks13

Followers13

Votes0

Ranorex Studio vs Selenide: What are the differences?

Support for Web and Mobile Testing: Ranorex Studio is a comprehensive test automation tool that supports both web and mobile applications. It provides a range of features for testing on different platforms, making it a versatile choice for testing across various devices and environments. On the other hand, Selenide primarily focuses on web application testing and does not offer built-in support for mobile testing.
Programming Language Integration: Ranorex Studio supports a variety of programming languages such as C#, VB.NET, and Python, allowing users to choose the language they are most comfortable with for test automation. In contrast, Selenide is specifically designed for Java-based automation using Selenium WebDriver, which may limit flexibility for teams using different programming languages in their projects.
Built-in Test Reporting: Ranorex Studio comes with built-in reporting capabilities that provide detailed insights into test results, making it easier for teams to track and analyze test outcomes. Selenide, however, relies on external reporting tools or custom solutions for generating comprehensive test reports, which may require additional setup and configuration.
Object Identification Mechanism: Ranorex Studio utilizes a robust object identification mechanism that recognizes objects based on various attributes, making it easier to create reliable and maintainable test scripts. Selenide, on the other hand, relies on CSS and XPath selectors for locating elements, which may be less intuitive for testers without strong web development skills.
Community and Support: Ranorex Studio offers dedicated support through forums, documentation, and training resources, as well as a vibrant community of users who actively contribute to knowledge sharing. Selenide, while benefiting from the larger Selenium community, may have fewer resources specifically tailored to Selenide users, potentially leading to longer resolution times for issues or queries.
License and Pricing: Ranorex Studio is a commercial tool that requires a paid license for full access to all its features, making it a more significant investment for organizations looking for comprehensive test automation solutions. On the other hand, Selenide is an open-source framework built on top of Selenium WebDriver, offering a cost-effective option for teams seeking a free and customizable testing solution.

In Summary, Ranorex Studio offers comprehensive support for both web and mobile testing, multiple language integrations, built-in reporting, robust object identification, strong community support, and a commercial licensing model compared to Selenide's focus on web testing with Java, reliance on external reporting tools, CSS/XPath selectors for object identification, limited community resources, and an open-source framework.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Selenide, Ranorex Studio

Esther

Feb 16, 2020

Needs adviceon

react-testing-library

Hi, I am starting out to test an application that is currently being developed - FE: React. BE: Node JS. I want the framework to be able to test all UI scenarios (from simple to complex) and also have the capability to test APIs. I also need to run tests across all OSs and Browsers (Windows, Mac, Android, iOS). I have also looked into react-testing-library and @TestProject.io. Any advice you can give as to which framework would be best and why would be so much appreciated! Thank you!!

96.5k views96.5k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Selenide	Ranorex Studio
It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.	It empowers testers with a complete toolset for end-to-end testing of desktop, web and mobile applications in a single license. Automate tests on a Windows desktop, and then execute them locally or remotely, on real iOS or Android mobile devices or on simulators/emulators.
Concise fluent API for tests; Ajax support for stable tests; Powerful selectors; Simple configuration	Reliable object identification; Broad technology support; Easily maintainable repository; Easy for beginners, powerful for experts
Statistics
GitHub Stars 0	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 0	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 56	Stacks 13
Followers 85	Followers 13
Votes 16	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 5 Nice JAVA API 2 Integrated with WebDriverManager project 2 Very mature API 2 File upload support 2 Integrated with Selenium-Jupiter framework Cons 1 Hybrid page model not possible	No community feedback yet
Integrations
BrowserStack Android Studio Selendroid Sauce Labs	Jira Jenkins Firefox Google Chrome Safari Microsoft Edge

What are some alternatives to Selenide, Ranorex Studio?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

Related Comparisons

Ranorex Studio vs Selenide: What are the differences?

Support for Web and Mobile Testing: Ranorex Studio is a comprehensive test automation tool that supports both web and mobile applications. It provides a range of features for testing on different platforms, making it a versatile choice for testing across various devices and environments. On the other hand, Selenide primarily focuses on web application testing and does not offer built-in support for mobile testing.
Programming Language Integration: Ranorex Studio supports a variety of programming languages such as C#, VB.NET, and Python, allowing users to choose the language they are most comfortable with for test automation. In contrast, Selenide is specifically designed for Java-based automation using Selenium WebDriver, which may limit flexibility for teams using different programming languages in their projects.
Built-in Test Reporting: Ranorex Studio comes with built-in reporting capabilities that provide detailed insights into test results, making it easier for teams to track and analyze test outcomes. Selenide, however, relies on external reporting tools or custom solutions for generating comprehensive test reports, which may require additional setup and configuration.
Object Identification Mechanism: Ranorex Studio utilizes a robust object identification mechanism that recognizes objects based on various attributes, making it easier to create reliable and maintainable test scripts. Selenide, on the other hand, relies on CSS and XPath selectors for locating elements, which may be less intuitive for testers without strong web development skills.
Community and Support: Ranorex Studio offers dedicated support through forums, documentation, and training resources, as well as a vibrant community of users who actively contribute to knowledge sharing. Selenide, while benefiting from the larger Selenium community, may have fewer resources specifically tailored to Selenide users, potentially leading to longer resolution times for issues or queries.
License and Pricing: Ranorex Studio is a commercial tool that requires a paid license for full access to all its features, making it a more significant investment for organizations looking for comprehensive test automation solutions. On the other hand, Selenide is an open-source framework built on top of Selenium WebDriver, offering a cost-effective option for teams seeking a free and customizable testing solution.

Ranorex Studio vs Selenide

Overview