Alternatives to Smartling logo

Alternatives to Smartling

Transifex, Phrase, Lokalise, Crowdin, and Postman are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Smartling.
8
0

What is Smartling and what are its top alternatives?

Smartling is a cloud-based translation management system that helps businesses localize their content efficiently. Key features include automated translation workflows, customizable translation memory, support for various file formats, real-time collaboration, and integration with popular CMS and marketing systems. However, some limitations of Smartling include the high pricing for smaller businesses, limited support for certain languages, and the complexity of the user interface.

  1. Transifex: Transifex is a localization platform that offers a collaborative translation environment, support for multiple file types, integration with popular development tools, and real-time progress tracking. Pros of Transifex include its user-friendly interface and robust API, while cons include limited support for some languages and higher pricing for enterprise features compared to Smartling.
  2. Crowdin: Crowdin provides localization solutions for businesses with features like translation memory, machine translation, collaboration tools, integrations with popular CMS and version control systems, and automated workflows. Pros of Crowdin include its affordable pricing plans and user-friendly interface, while cons include limited support for certain file formats and less advanced reporting compared to Smartling.
  3. Phrase: Phrase is a translation management system that offers features like translation memory, glossary management, in-context editing, integrations with popular tools, and API access. Pros of Phrase include its simple interface and flexible pricing options, while cons include limited support for some advanced translation features compared to Smartling.
  4. POEditor: POEditor is a localization platform that provides translation management tools like version control, terminology consistency, machine translation, workflow automation, and integration with various platforms. Pros of POEditor include its competitive pricing and versatile API, while cons include limited support for some complex file formats and slower customer support compared to Smartling.
  5. Lokalise: Lokalise offers translation management features such as intelligent machine translation, automated workflows, in-context editing, version control, and integrations with popular tools like Slack and GitHub. Pros of Lokalise include its comprehensive set of localization tools and competitive pricing, while cons include a steeper learning curve for new users compared to Smartling.
  6. Weblate: Weblate is an open-source web-based translation platform that provides features like translation memory, proofreading, suggestions, access control, and integration with version control systems. Pros of Weblate include its free and open-source nature, while cons include the need for self-hosting and potential lack of dedicated customer support compared to Smartling.
  7. Memsource: Memsource offers translation management tools like translation memory, machine translation, project management, in-context editing, and integrations with various content management systems. Pros of Memsource include its user-friendly interface and customizable workflows, while cons include higher pricing for enterprise features and limited support for some Asian languages compared to Smartling.
  8. POEditor: POEditor is a localization platform that provides translation management tools like version control, terminology consistency, machine translation, workflow automation, and integration with various platforms. Pros of POEditor include its competitive pricing and versatile API, while cons include limited support for some complex file formats and slower customer support compared to Smartling.
  9. Gengo: Gengo is a human translation platform that offers services like professional translators, fast turnaround times, quality assurance, and support for multiple languages. Pros of Gengo include its quick translation services and flexible pricing options, while cons include potential variability in translation quality compared to Smartling.
  10. OneSky: OneSky is a translation management system that provides features like machine translation, quality assurance, in-context editing, integrations with popular tools, and customizable workflows. Pros of OneSky include its affordable pricing plans and easy-to-use interface, while cons include limited support for some file formats and languages compared to Smartling.

Top Alternatives to Smartling

  • Transifex
    Transifex

    Transifex is a cloud-based localization platform built to help you manage the translation and localization of your app, website, video subtitles, and more. It acts as a repository for your content (think GitHub for translation) and includes tools for developers to get that content into Transifex automatically. Transifex also provides translators a web interface to submit translations. ...

  • Phrase
    Phrase

    The Phrase Localization Platform is a unique, AI-powered language platform that integrates translation, scoring, and automation tools in one place for businesses and language service providers. ...

  • Lokalise
    Lokalise

    It is a translation management system, which is designed to make the process of localization faster and easier. Our platform reduces manual work and routine tasks that appear while translating web and mobile apps, games, and other software. ...

  • Crowdin
    Crowdin

    Crowdin is localization management software enchanced by AI for teams. Translate your apps, websites, games, documentation, marketing campaigns, and other content into 100+ languages. Create a native experience for your global customers. ...

  • Postman
    Postman

    It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide. ...

  • Postman
    Postman

    It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide. ...

  • Stack Overflow
    Stack Overflow

    Stack Overflow is a question and answer site for professional and enthusiast programmers. It's built and run by you as part of the Stack Exchange network of Q&A sites. With your help, we're working together to build a library of detailed answers to every question about programming. ...

  • Google Maps
    Google Maps

    Create rich applications and stunning visualisations of your data, leveraging the comprehensiveness, accuracy, and usability of Google Maps and a modern web platform that scales as you grow. ...

Smartling alternatives & related posts

Transifex logo

Transifex

76
82
4
GitHub for Translation
76
82
+ 1
4
PROS OF TRANSIFEX
  • 1
    Best customer service
  • 1
    Highly technical team
  • 1
    Can scale to tens of millions of words
  • 1
    Solid API, well-documented
CONS OF TRANSIFEX
  • 2
    App is the source of truth

related Transifex posts

Phrase logo

Phrase

69
56
13
The all-in-one localization platform.
69
56
+ 1
13
PROS OF PHRASE
  • 4
    Great support
  • 2
    Cross platform
  • 2
    Easy integration with API
  • 2
    Great UX - very straightforward
  • 1
    rails
  • 1
    ios
  • 1
    fast platform
CONS OF PHRASE
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Phrase posts

    Lokalise logo

    Lokalise

    56
    35
    0
    The easiest way to translate web and mobile apps.
    56
    35
    + 1
    0
    PROS OF LOKALISE
      Be the first to leave a pro
      CONS OF LOKALISE
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Lokalise posts

        Crowdin logo

        Crowdin

        92
        95
        33
        Localization Management Platform
        92
        95
        + 1
        33
        PROS OF CROWDIN
        • 10
          Powerful tools and excellent customer support
        • 4
          Allows community-based translation
        • 4
          It's great tool for localization
        • 4
          Steep prices 🙁
        • 3
          GitHub integration (opens PR on translation done)
        • 2
          Variety of input formats
        • 2
          Works with multi level YAML sources
        • 2
          Great support
        • 2
          ICU support (better than other services)
        CONS OF CROWDIN
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Crowdin posts

          Redesigned the Zephir documentation website. This included converting all the documentation to markdown in its own repository. We connected the documentation to Crowdin for our translations/localization service. Our repositories are all on GitHub .

          A new application was created to handle the website. The application was developed using nanobox.io locally, with Phalcon and PhpStorm as the editor. We also integrated with Algolia for our search using their docsearch service.

          The stack was deployed to our servers and is now live!

          Phalcon Zephir #Documentation

          See more
          Postman logo

          Postman

          94.4K
          81K
          1.8K
          Only complete API development environment
          94.4K
          81K
          + 1
          1.8K
          PROS OF POSTMAN
          • 490
            Easy to use
          • 369
            Great tool
          • 276
            Makes developing rest api's easy peasy
          • 156
            Easy setup, looks good
          • 144
            The best api workflow out there
          • 53
            It's the best
          • 53
            History feature
          • 44
            Adds real value to my workflow
          • 43
            Great interface that magically predicts your needs
          • 35
            The best in class app
          • 12
            Can save and share script
          • 10
            Fully featured without looking cluttered
          • 8
            Collections
          • 8
            Option to run scrips
          • 8
            Global/Environment Variables
          • 7
            Shareable Collections
          • 7
            Dead simple and useful. Excellent
          • 7
            Dark theme easy on the eyes
          • 6
            Awesome customer support
          • 6
            Great integration with newman
          • 5
            Documentation
          • 5
            Simple
          • 5
            The test script is useful
          • 4
            Saves responses
          • 4
            This has simplified my testing significantly
          • 4
            Makes testing API's as easy as 1,2,3
          • 4
            Easy as pie
          • 3
            API-network
          • 3
            I'd recommend it to everyone who works with apis
          • 3
            Mocking API calls with predefined response
          • 2
            Now supports GraphQL
          • 2
            Postman Runner CI Integration
          • 2
            Easy to setup, test and provides test storage
          • 2
            Continuous integration using newman
          • 2
            Pre-request Script and Test attributes are invaluable
          • 2
            Runner
          • 2
            Graph
          • 1
            <a href="http://fixbit.com/">useful tool</a>
          CONS OF POSTMAN
          • 10
            Stores credentials in HTTP
          • 9
            Bloated features and UI
          • 8
            Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens
          • 7
            Poor GraphQL support
          • 5
            Expensive
          • 3
            Not free after 5 users
          • 3
            Can't prompt for per-request variables
          • 1
            Import swagger
          • 1
            Support websocket
          • 1
            Import curl

          related Postman posts

          Noah Zoschke
          Engineering Manager at Segment · | 30 upvotes · 3M views

          We just launched the Segment Config API (try it out for yourself here) — a set of public REST APIs that enable you to manage your Segment configuration. A public API is only as good as its #documentation. For the API reference doc we are using Postman.

          Postman is an “API development environment”. You download the desktop app, and build API requests by URL and payload. Over time you can build up a set of requests and organize them into a “Postman Collection”. You can generalize a collection with “collection variables”. This allows you to parameterize things like username, password and workspace_name so a user can fill their own values in before making an API call. This makes it possible to use Postman for one-off API tasks instead of writing code.

          Then you can add Markdown content to the entire collection, a folder of related methods, and/or every API method to explain how the APIs work. You can publish a collection and easily share it with a URL.

          This turns Postman from a personal #API utility to full-blown public interactive API documentation. The result is a great looking web page with all the API calls, docs and sample requests and responses in one place. Check out the results here.

          Postman’s powers don’t end here. You can automate Postman with “test scripts” and have it periodically run a collection scripts as “monitors”. We now have #QA around all the APIs in public docs to make sure they are always correct

          Along the way we tried other techniques for documenting APIs like ReadMe.io or Swagger UI. These required a lot of effort to customize.

          Writing and maintaining a Postman collection takes some work, but the resulting documentation site, interactivity and API testing tools are well worth it.

          See more
          Simon Reymann
          Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 27 upvotes · 5.1M views

          Our whole Node.js backend stack consists of the following tools:

          • Lerna as a tool for multi package and multi repository management
          • npm as package manager
          • NestJS as Node.js framework
          • TypeScript as programming language
          • ExpressJS as web server
          • Swagger UI for visualizing and interacting with the API’s resources
          • Postman as a tool for API development
          • TypeORM as object relational mapping layer
          • JSON Web Token for access token management

          The main reason we have chosen Node.js over PHP is related to the following artifacts:

          • Made for the web and widely in use: Node.js is a software platform for developing server-side network services. Well-known projects that rely on Node.js include the blogging software Ghost, the project management tool Trello and the operating system WebOS. Node.js requires the JavaScript runtime environment V8, which was specially developed by Google for the popular Chrome browser. This guarantees a very resource-saving architecture, which qualifies Node.js especially for the operation of a web server. Ryan Dahl, the developer of Node.js, released the first stable version on May 27, 2009. He developed Node.js out of dissatisfaction with the possibilities that JavaScript offered at the time. The basic functionality of Node.js has been mapped with JavaScript since the first version, which can be expanded with a large number of different modules. The current package managers (npm or Yarn) for Node.js know more than 1,000,000 of these modules.
          • Fast server-side solutions: Node.js adopts the JavaScript "event-loop" to create non-blocking I/O applications that conveniently serve simultaneous events. With the standard available asynchronous processing within JavaScript/TypeScript, highly scalable, server-side solutions can be realized. The efficient use of the CPU and the RAM is maximized and more simultaneous requests can be processed than with conventional multi-thread servers.
          • A language along the entire stack: Widely used frameworks such as React or AngularJS or Vue.js, which we prefer, are written in JavaScript/TypeScript. If Node.js is now used on the server side, you can use all the advantages of a uniform script language throughout the entire application development. The same language in the back- and frontend simplifies the maintenance of the application and also the coordination within the development team.
          • Flexibility: Node.js sets very few strict dependencies, rules and guidelines and thus grants a high degree of flexibility in application development. There are no strict conventions so that the appropriate architecture, design structures, modules and features can be freely selected for the development.
          See more
          Postman logo

          Postman

          94.4K
          81K
          1.8K
          Only complete API development environment
          94.4K
          81K
          + 1
          1.8K
          PROS OF POSTMAN
          • 490
            Easy to use
          • 369
            Great tool
          • 276
            Makes developing rest api's easy peasy
          • 156
            Easy setup, looks good
          • 144
            The best api workflow out there
          • 53
            It's the best
          • 53
            History feature
          • 44
            Adds real value to my workflow
          • 43
            Great interface that magically predicts your needs
          • 35
            The best in class app
          • 12
            Can save and share script
          • 10
            Fully featured without looking cluttered
          • 8
            Collections
          • 8
            Option to run scrips
          • 8
            Global/Environment Variables
          • 7
            Shareable Collections
          • 7
            Dead simple and useful. Excellent
          • 7
            Dark theme easy on the eyes
          • 6
            Awesome customer support
          • 6
            Great integration with newman
          • 5
            Documentation
          • 5
            Simple
          • 5
            The test script is useful
          • 4
            Saves responses
          • 4
            This has simplified my testing significantly
          • 4
            Makes testing API's as easy as 1,2,3
          • 4
            Easy as pie
          • 3
            API-network
          • 3
            I'd recommend it to everyone who works with apis
          • 3
            Mocking API calls with predefined response
          • 2
            Now supports GraphQL
          • 2
            Postman Runner CI Integration
          • 2
            Easy to setup, test and provides test storage
          • 2
            Continuous integration using newman
          • 2
            Pre-request Script and Test attributes are invaluable
          • 2
            Runner
          • 2
            Graph
          • 1
            <a href="http://fixbit.com/">useful tool</a>
          CONS OF POSTMAN
          • 10
            Stores credentials in HTTP
          • 9
            Bloated features and UI
          • 8
            Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens
          • 7
            Poor GraphQL support
          • 5
            Expensive
          • 3
            Not free after 5 users
          • 3
            Can't prompt for per-request variables
          • 1
            Import swagger
          • 1
            Support websocket
          • 1
            Import curl

          related Postman posts

          Noah Zoschke
          Engineering Manager at Segment · | 30 upvotes · 3M views

          We just launched the Segment Config API (try it out for yourself here) — a set of public REST APIs that enable you to manage your Segment configuration. A public API is only as good as its #documentation. For the API reference doc we are using Postman.

          Postman is an “API development environment”. You download the desktop app, and build API requests by URL and payload. Over time you can build up a set of requests and organize them into a “Postman Collection”. You can generalize a collection with “collection variables”. This allows you to parameterize things like username, password and workspace_name so a user can fill their own values in before making an API call. This makes it possible to use Postman for one-off API tasks instead of writing code.

          Then you can add Markdown content to the entire collection, a folder of related methods, and/or every API method to explain how the APIs work. You can publish a collection and easily share it with a URL.

          This turns Postman from a personal #API utility to full-blown public interactive API documentation. The result is a great looking web page with all the API calls, docs and sample requests and responses in one place. Check out the results here.

          Postman’s powers don’t end here. You can automate Postman with “test scripts” and have it periodically run a collection scripts as “monitors”. We now have #QA around all the APIs in public docs to make sure they are always correct

          Along the way we tried other techniques for documenting APIs like ReadMe.io or Swagger UI. These required a lot of effort to customize.

          Writing and maintaining a Postman collection takes some work, but the resulting documentation site, interactivity and API testing tools are well worth it.

          See more
          Simon Reymann
          Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 27 upvotes · 5.1M views

          Our whole Node.js backend stack consists of the following tools:

          • Lerna as a tool for multi package and multi repository management
          • npm as package manager
          • NestJS as Node.js framework
          • TypeScript as programming language
          • ExpressJS as web server
          • Swagger UI for visualizing and interacting with the API’s resources
          • Postman as a tool for API development
          • TypeORM as object relational mapping layer
          • JSON Web Token for access token management

          The main reason we have chosen Node.js over PHP is related to the following artifacts:

          • Made for the web and widely in use: Node.js is a software platform for developing server-side network services. Well-known projects that rely on Node.js include the blogging software Ghost, the project management tool Trello and the operating system WebOS. Node.js requires the JavaScript runtime environment V8, which was specially developed by Google for the popular Chrome browser. This guarantees a very resource-saving architecture, which qualifies Node.js especially for the operation of a web server. Ryan Dahl, the developer of Node.js, released the first stable version on May 27, 2009. He developed Node.js out of dissatisfaction with the possibilities that JavaScript offered at the time. The basic functionality of Node.js has been mapped with JavaScript since the first version, which can be expanded with a large number of different modules. The current package managers (npm or Yarn) for Node.js know more than 1,000,000 of these modules.
          • Fast server-side solutions: Node.js adopts the JavaScript "event-loop" to create non-blocking I/O applications that conveniently serve simultaneous events. With the standard available asynchronous processing within JavaScript/TypeScript, highly scalable, server-side solutions can be realized. The efficient use of the CPU and the RAM is maximized and more simultaneous requests can be processed than with conventional multi-thread servers.
          • A language along the entire stack: Widely used frameworks such as React or AngularJS or Vue.js, which we prefer, are written in JavaScript/TypeScript. If Node.js is now used on the server side, you can use all the advantages of a uniform script language throughout the entire application development. The same language in the back- and frontend simplifies the maintenance of the application and also the coordination within the development team.
          • Flexibility: Node.js sets very few strict dependencies, rules and guidelines and thus grants a high degree of flexibility in application development. There are no strict conventions so that the appropriate architecture, design structures, modules and features can be freely selected for the development.
          See more
          Stack Overflow logo

          Stack Overflow

          69K
          61K
          893
          Question and answer site for professional and enthusiast programmers
          69K
          61K
          + 1
          893
          PROS OF STACK OVERFLOW
          • 257
            Scary smart community
          • 206
            Knows all
          • 142
            Voting system
          • 134
            Good questions
          • 83
            Good SEO
          • 22
            Addictive
          • 14
            Tight focus
          • 10
            Share and gain knowledge
          • 7
            Useful
          • 3
            Fast loading
          • 2
            Gamification
          • 1
            Knows everyone
          • 1
            Experts share experience and answer questions
          • 1
            Stack overflow to developers As google to net surfers
          • 1
            Questions answered quickly
          • 1
            No annoying ads
          • 1
            No spam
          • 1
            Fast community response
          • 1
            Good moderators
          • 1
            Quick answers from users
          • 1
            Good answers
          • 1
            User reputation ranking
          • 1
            Efficient answers
          • 1
            Leading developer community
          CONS OF STACK OVERFLOW
          • 3
            Not welcoming to newbies
          • 3
            Unfair downvoting
          • 3
            Unfriendly moderators
          • 3
            No opinion based questions
          • 3
            Mean users
          • 2
            Limited to types of questions it can accept

          related Stack Overflow posts

          Tom Klein

          Google Analytics is a great tool to analyze your traffic. To debug our software and ask questions, we love to use Postman and Stack Overflow. Google Drive helps our team to share documents. We're able to build our great products through the APIs by Google Maps, CloudFlare, Stripe, PayPal, Twilio, Let's Encrypt, and TensorFlow.

          See more
          Google Maps logo

          Google Maps

          41.4K
          28.9K
          567
          Build highly customisable maps with your own content and imagery
          41.4K
          28.9K
          + 1
          567
          PROS OF GOOGLE MAPS
          • 253
            Free
          • 136
            Address input through maps api
          • 82
            Sharable Directions
          • 47
            Google Earth
          • 46
            Unique
          • 3
            Custom maps designing
          CONS OF GOOGLE MAPS
          • 4
            Google Attributions and logo
          • 1
            Only map allowed alongside google place autocomplete

          related Google Maps posts

          Tom Klein

          Google Analytics is a great tool to analyze your traffic. To debug our software and ask questions, we love to use Postman and Stack Overflow. Google Drive helps our team to share documents. We're able to build our great products through the APIs by Google Maps, CloudFlare, Stripe, PayPal, Twilio, Let's Encrypt, and TensorFlow.

          See more

          A huge component of our product relies on gathering public data about locations of interest. Google Places API gives us that ability in the most efficient way. Since we are primarily going to be using as google data as a source of information for our MVP, we might as well start integrating the Google Places API in our system. We have worked with Google Maps in the past and we might take some inspiration from our previous projects onto this one.

          See more