StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Javascript Testing Framework
  5. Sorry-cypress vs SuperTest

Sorry-cypress vs SuperTest

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

SuperTest
SuperTest
Stacks1.9K
Followers102
Votes0
Sorry-cypress
Sorry-cypress
Stacks8
Followers31
Votes5
GitHub Stars2.8K
Forks299

Sorry-cypress vs SuperTest: What are the differences?

Introduction: In the realm of testing tools, Sorry-cypress and SuperTest are two popular options that offer distinct features and functionalities. Understanding the key differences between these tools is crucial for choosing the most suitable one for your testing needs.

  1. Architecture: Sorry-cypress is a distributed, open-source alternative to the cypress.io dashboard, providing benefits such as improved test run management and parallelization. In contrast, SuperTest is a lightweight, flexible testing library for Node.js HTTP servers, offering simplicity and ease of use.

  2. Focusing Area: Sorry-cypress is primarily designed for end-to-end testing, focusing on the visualization of test results and test run management, ensuring a seamless testing experience. On the other hand, SuperTest excels in API testing capabilities, enabling developers to send HTTP requests and assert the responses efficiently.

  3. Integration: Sorry-cypress integrates seamlessly with GitHub Actions, allowing integration into existing CI/CD pipelines for convenient automation and reporting. Meanwhile, SuperTest can be integrated with various testing frameworks such as Mocha and Jest, providing flexibility in choosing the preferred testing environment.

  4. Community Support: Sorry-cypress benefits from an active community that contributes to its development and provides resources for troubleshooting and enhancement. In comparison, SuperTest's community support may be more limited, impacting the availability of additional resources and assistance.

  5. Monitoring Capabilities: Sorry-cypress offers detailed insights into test performance and execution, enabling users to monitor and analyze test runs effectively. SuperTest, on the other hand, focuses more on the execution of API requests and responses without extensive monitoring features.

  6. Ease of Setup: Sorry-cypress simplifies the setup process through its distributed architecture and user-friendly interface, making it easy for users to get started with their testing tasks. SuperTest, while straightforward to use, may require additional configurations and setups depending on the testing requirements.

In Summary, Sorry-cypress excels in visualizing test results and test run management for end-to-end testing, while SuperTest focuses on efficient API testing capabilities and ease of use for Node.js HTTP servers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

SuperTest
SuperTest
Sorry-cypress
Sorry-cypress

It is a super-agent driven library for testing node.js HTTP servers using a fluent API. It provides a high-level abstraction for testing HTTP, while still allowing you to drop down to the lower-level API provided by superagent.

Open-source, self-hosted alternative Cypress Dashboard.

HTTP assertions;Asynchronous;Promise support
Run cypress tests in parallel with no limitations; Upload screenshots and videos to your own storage; Browse test results, screenshots and video recordings; Self-hosted - use your own infrastructure, own your data; Integrate with GitHub or anything else via webhooks; Ready to use Docker images, Kubernetes and AWS Cloud Formation template
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
2.8K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
299
Stacks
1.9K
Stacks
8
Followers
102
Followers
31
Votes
0
Votes
5
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 3
    Host your own dashboard privately
  • 2
    Free reports
Cons
  • 1
    HTML reports are not as feature rich as Cypress dash
Integrations
No integrations available
GitHub
GitHub
Docker
Docker
GitLab
GitLab
Heroku
Heroku
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Google Cloud Platform
Google Cloud Platform
Docker Compose
Docker Compose
Helm
Helm

What are some alternatives to SuperTest, Sorry-cypress?

Mocha

Mocha

Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.

Jasmine

Jasmine

Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.

Jest

Jest

Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

Cypress

Cypress

Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.

CodeceptJS

CodeceptJS

It is a modern end to end testing framework with a special BDD-style syntax. The test is written as a linear scenario of user's action on a site. Each test is described inside a Scenario function with I object passed into it.

Protractor

Protractor

Protractor is an end-to-end test framework for Angular and AngularJS applications. Protractor runs tests against your application running in a real browser, interacting with it as a user would.

AVA

AVA

Even though JavaScript is single-threaded, IO in Node.js can happen in parallel due to its async nature. AVA takes advantage of this and runs your tests concurrently, which is especially beneficial for IO heavy tests. In addition, test files are run in parallel as separate processes, giving you even better performance and an isolated environment for each test file.

Ghost Inspector

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

QUnit

QUnit

QUnit is a powerful, easy-to-use JavaScript unit testing framework. It's used by the jQuery, jQuery UI and jQuery Mobile projects and is capable of testing any generic JavaScript code, including itself!

Baretest

Baretest

It is a fast and simple JavaScript test runner. It offers near-instant performance and a brainless API. It makes testing tolerable.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana