StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Javascript Testing Framework
  5. Sorry-cypress vs Venus.js

Sorry-cypress vs Venus.js

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Venus.js
Venus.js
Stacks0
Followers3
Votes0
Sorry-cypress
Sorry-cypress
Stacks8
Followers31
Votes5
GitHub Stars2.8K
Forks299

Sorry-cypress vs Venus.js: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Sorry-cypress and Venus.js are both testing frameworks used for running end-to-end tests on web applications. However, there are some key differences between the two.

1. Architecture: Sorry-cypress is horizontally scalable, allowing it to run tests in parallel across multiple machines or containers. It uses a distributed model where tests are executed by separate instances called "cypress runners" and results are collected by a central "cypress dashboard" instance. On the other hand, Venus.js is a more traditional, single-machine testing framework.

2. Test Execution: In Sorry-cypress, tests are executed asynchronously, meaning that multiple tests can run simultaneously. Test runs are assigned to runners dynamically based on availability. Venus.js, on the other hand, executes tests sequentially, one after another, in a more linear manner.

3. Retry Logic: Sorry-cypress has built-in retry logic for flaky tests. It automatically retries failed tests up to a configurable number of times, increasing the chances of passing the test in subsequent retries. In Venus.js, there is no built-in retry logic, and developers need to manually implement retries if required.

4. Dashboard and Reporting: Sorry-cypress provides a comprehensive dashboard that displays test results, logs, and screenshots. It offers real-time updates, historical data, and the ability to compare different test runs. Venus.js, on the other hand, does not have a built-in dashboard or reporting feature. Developers need to rely on external tools or custom implementations for reporting and result analysis.

5. Plugins and Integrations: Sorry-cypress has a plugin system that allows developers to extend its functionality and integrate with other tools or services. It provides plugins for popular CI/CD platforms like Jenkins and GitHub Actions. Venus.js, on the other hand, has limited plugin support and fewer integrations available out-of-the-box.

6. Community and Support: Sorry-cypress has a relatively smaller community compared to Venus.js. However, it has active development and ongoing support from its maintainers. Venus.js, on the other hand, has been around for longer and has a larger community and more extensive support options available.

In summary, Sorry-cypress and Venus.js differ in their architecture, test execution approach, retry logic, dashboard and reporting capabilities, plugins and integrations, as well as community and support size.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Venus.js
Venus.js
Sorry-cypress
Sorry-cypress

It is a testing tool for JavaScript (JS), which simplifies running unit tests. When you are developing a browser-based project in JS, you'll want to create unit tests and run them frequently. Typically, you'll write a unit test using some library, such as Mocha or Jasmine. These libraries let you define testcases (or "specs" if you are following a BDD style), and provide APIs for writing assertions.

Open-source, self-hosted alternative Cypress Dashboard.

Use Simple annotations in your tests to specify which testing library you want to use, the file you are testing, other file dependencies, and a test harness template; Quickly run your browser-based tests directly from the command line using PhantomJS; Run your tests from the command line in multiple browsers (running locally or remotely) at the same time; Integration with Continuous Integration tools (Selenium Grid + Travis CI)
Run cypress tests in parallel with no limitations; Upload screenshots and videos to your own storage; Browse test results, screenshots and video recordings; Self-hosted - use your own infrastructure, own your data; Integrate with GitHub or anything else via webhooks; Ready to use Docker images, Kubernetes and AWS Cloud Formation template
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
2.8K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
299
Stacks
0
Stacks
8
Followers
3
Followers
31
Votes
0
Votes
5
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 3
    Host your own dashboard privately
  • 2
    Free reports
Cons
  • 1
    HTML reports are not as feature rich as Cypress dash
Integrations
JavaScript
JavaScript
Travis CI
Travis CI
GitHub
GitHub
Docker
Docker
GitLab
GitLab
Heroku
Heroku
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Google Cloud Platform
Google Cloud Platform
Docker Compose
Docker Compose
Helm
Helm

What are some alternatives to Venus.js, Sorry-cypress?

Mocha

Mocha

Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.

Jasmine

Jasmine

Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.

Jest

Jest

Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

Cypress

Cypress

Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.

CodeceptJS

CodeceptJS

It is a modern end to end testing framework with a special BDD-style syntax. The test is written as a linear scenario of user's action on a site. Each test is described inside a Scenario function with I object passed into it.

Protractor

Protractor

Protractor is an end-to-end test framework for Angular and AngularJS applications. Protractor runs tests against your application running in a real browser, interacting with it as a user would.

AVA

AVA

Even though JavaScript is single-threaded, IO in Node.js can happen in parallel due to its async nature. AVA takes advantage of this and runs your tests concurrently, which is especially beneficial for IO heavy tests. In addition, test files are run in parallel as separate processes, giving you even better performance and an isolated environment for each test file.

Ghost Inspector

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

QUnit

QUnit

QUnit is a powerful, easy-to-use JavaScript unit testing framework. It's used by the jQuery, jQuery UI and jQuery Mobile projects and is capable of testing any generic JavaScript code, including itself!

Baretest

Baretest

It is a fast and simple JavaScript test runner. It offers near-instant performance and a brainless API. It makes testing tolerable.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana