What is StackHawk and what are its top alternatives?
StackHawk is an application security tool that helps developers find, prioritize, and fix application security vulnerabilities. It offers features such as automated security testing, integration with CI/CD pipelines, and remediation guidance. However, some limitations of StackHawk include limited language support and a focus on web applications only.
- OWASP Zap: OWASP Zap is a popular open-source security tool for finding vulnerabilities in web applications. It offers features such as automated scanning, active and passive scanning modes, and integration with CI/CD pipelines. Pros include being open-source and having a large community, while a con is the learning curve for beginners.
- Veracode: Veracode is a comprehensive application security platform that offers static, dynamic, and software composition analysis. It provides features like vulnerability prioritization, compliance reporting, and integration with DevOps tools. Pros include a wide range of security testing capabilities, while a con is the high cost.
- Burp Suite: Burp Suite is a leading web application security testing tool that offers scanning, crawling, and vulnerability detection capabilities. It includes features such as traffic interception, cross-site scripting testing, and session management. Pros include robust scanning capabilities, while a con is the complex user interface.
- Netsparker: Netsparker is an automated web application security scanner that helps identify vulnerabilities such as SQL injection and cross-site scripting. It features proof-based scanning, integration with issue trackers, and compliance reporting. Pros include comprehensive scanning capabilities, while a con is the steep pricing.
- Acunetix: Acunetix is a web application security tool that offers automated scanning, manual testing tools, and vulnerability prioritization. It includes features such as authentication support, REST API testing, and integration with issue trackers. Pros include a user-friendly interface, while a con is the high cost for enterprise plans.
- Rapid7 AppSpider: Rapid7 AppSpider is a dynamic application security testing tool that provides scanning for web applications, APIs, and cloud environments. It offers features like scan scheduling, compliance reporting, and integration with popular security tools. Pros include comprehensive scanning capabilities, while a con is the pricing model based on the number of scans.
- Qualys Web Application Scanning: Qualys Web Application Scanning is a cloud-based solution for automating web application security testing. It offers features such as vulnerability assessment, malware detection, and integration with web application firewalls. Pros include scalability and automation, while a con is the pricing based on the number of web applications scanned.
- Detectify: Detectify is a website security scanner that provides automated testing for vulnerabilities like XSS, SQL injection, and CSRF. It features continuous scanning, customizable security tests, and integration with popular security tools. Pros include easy setup and use, while a con is the limited scalability for large applications.
- AppCheck: AppCheck is a cloud-based security scanning tool that offers automated testing for web applications and APIs. It includes features such as URL discovery, compliance reporting, and integration with issue trackers. Pros include fast scanning speeds, while a con is the limited customization options.
- Tenable.io Web Application Scanning: Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is a vulnerability management solution that provides continuous monitoring and testing for web applications. It offers features like prioritized risk scoring, compliance reporting, and integration with Tenable's other security products. Pros include comprehensive vulnerability management, while a con is the complex pricing model.
Top Alternatives to StackHawk
- Sentry
Sentry’s Application Monitoring platform helps developers see performance issues, fix errors faster, and optimize their code health. ...
- OpenSSL
It is a robust, commercial-grade, and full-featured toolkit for the Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) protocols. It is also a general-purpose cryptography library. ...
- TrackJS
Production error monitoring and reporting for web applications. TrackJS provides deep insights into real user errors. See the user, network, and application events that tell the story of an error so you can actually fix them. ...
- Let's Encrypt
It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG). ...
- Rollbar
Rollbar is the leading continuous code improvement platform that proactively discovers, predicts, and remediates errors with real-time AI-assisted workflows. With Rollbar, developers continually improve their code and constantly innovate ra ...
- Bugsnag
Bugsnag captures errors from your web, mobile and back-end applications, providing instant visibility into user impact. Diagnostic data and tools are included to help your team prioritize, debug and fix exceptions fast. ...
- Ensighten
Ensighten is a comprehensive website security company, offering next generation compliance, enforcement and client-side protection against data loss, ad injection and intrusion. ...
- Airbrake
Airbrake collects errors for your applications in all major languages and frameworks. We alert you to new errors and give you critical context, trends and details needed to find and fix errors fast. ...
StackHawk alternatives & related posts
Sentry
- Consolidates similar errors and makes resolution easy237
- Email Notifications121
- Open source108
- Slack integration84
- Github integration71
- Easy49
- User-friendly interface44
- The most important tool we use in production28
- Hipchat integration18
- Heroku Integration17
- Good documentation15
- Free tier14
- Self-hosted11
- Easy setup9
- Realiable7
- Provides context, and great stack trace6
- Feedback form on error pages4
- Love it baby4
- Gitlab integration3
- Filter by custom tags3
- Super user friendly3
- Captures local variables at each frame in backtraces3
- Easy Integration3
- Performance measurements1
- Confusing UI12
- Bundle size4
related Sentry posts
For my portfolio websites and my personal OpenSource projects I had started exclusively using React and JavaScript so I needed a way to track any errors that we're happening for my users that I didn't uncover during my personal UAT.
I had narrowed it down to two tools LogRocket and Sentry (I also tried Bugsnag but it did not make the final two). Before I get into this I want to say that both of these tools are amazing and whichever you choose will suit your needs well.
I firstly decided to go with LogRocket the fact that they had a recorded screen capture of what the user was doing when the bug happened was amazing... I could go back and rewatch what the user did to replicate that error, this was fantastic. It was also very easy to setup and get going. They had options for React and Redux.js so you can track all your Redux.js actions. I had a fairly large Redux.js store, this was ended up being a issue, it killed the processing power on my machine, Chrome ended up using 2-4gb of ram, so I quickly disabled the Redux.js option.
After using LogRocket for a month or so I decided to switch to Sentry. I noticed that Sentry was openSorce and everyone was talking about Sentry so I thought I may as well give it a test drive. Setting it up was so easy, I had everything up and running within seconds. It also gives you the option to wrap an errorBoundry in React so get more specific errors. The simplicity of Sentry was a breath of fresh air, it allowed me find the bug that was shown to the user and fix that very simply. The UI for Sentry is beautiful and just really clean to look at, and their emails are also just perfect.
I have decided to stick with Sentry for the long run, I tested pretty much all the JS error loggers and I find Sentry the best.
Need advice on this.
Which one should I use for logging and error monitoring ( Datadog / Sentry / Stackdriver )?
Open to any other solutions.
OpenSSL
related OpenSSL posts
Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:
- GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
- Respectively Git as revision control system
- SourceTree as Git GUI
- Visual Studio Code as IDE
- CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
- Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
- SonarQube as quality gate
- Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
- VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
- Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
- Heroku for deploying in test environments
- nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
- SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
- Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
- PostgreSQL as preferred database system
- Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)
The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:
- Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
- Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
- Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
- Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
- Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
- Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
- Great error reporting12
- Great experience. Neat reporting2
- Awesome engineer support2
- Easy Setup2
- Telemetry Timeline2
- Realtime alerts1
- Slack Integration1
- Vivastreet0
related TrackJS posts
- Open Source SSL48
- Simple setup32
- Free9
- Microservices9
- Easy ssl certificates0
related Let's Encrypt posts
- Consolidates similar errors by impact74
- Centralize error management64
- Slack integration63
- Github integration58
- Usage based pricing47
- Insane customer support32
- Instant search23
- Heroku integration21
- Consolidate errors by OS18
- Great Free Plan15
- Trello integration15
- Flexible logging (not just exceptions)13
- Simple yet powerful error tracking tool11
- Multiple Language Support9
- Consolidate errors by browser7
- Easy setup6
- Query errors with RQL6
- Best rails exception handler5
- Deployment tracking is a nice free bonus5
- Awesome service5
- Simple and fast integration5
- Easy setup, friendly ui, demo, lots of integrations4
- Beat your users to the error report3
- Server-side + client-side3
- Errors Analysis3
- Clear and concise information.3
- Powerful3
- Mailgun integration2
- Easy integration with sails.js2
- Bitbucket integration2
- Clear errors on deploy or push1
- Easy Set up familiar UI that doesn't make you look dumb1
- Teams1
- Gitlab integration1
related Rollbar posts
Our primary source of monitoring and alerting is Datadog. We’ve got prebuilt dashboards for every scenario and integration with PagerDuty to manage routing any alerts. We’ve definitely scaled past the point where managing dashboards is easy, but we haven’t had time to invest in using features like Anomaly Detection. We’ve started using Honeycomb for some targeted debugging of complex production issues and we are liking what we’ve seen. We capture any unhandled exceptions with Rollbar and, if we realize one will keep happening, we quickly convert the metrics to point back to Datadog, to keep Rollbar as clean as possible.
We use Segment to consolidate all of our trackers, the most important of which goes to Amplitude to analyze user patterns. However, if we need a more consolidated view, we push all of our data to our own data warehouse running PostgreSQL; this is available for analytics and dashboard creation through Looker.
Bugsnag
- Lots of 3rd party integrations45
- Really reliable42
- Includes a free plan37
- No usage or rate limits25
- Design23
- Slack integration21
- Responsive support21
- Free tier19
- Unlimited11
- No Rate6
- Email notifications5
- Great customer support3
- React Native3
- Integrates well with Laravel3
- Reliable, great UI and insights, used for all our apps3
- Error grouping doesn't always work2
- Bad billing model2
related Bugsnag posts
For my portfolio websites and my personal OpenSource projects I had started exclusively using React and JavaScript so I needed a way to track any errors that we're happening for my users that I didn't uncover during my personal UAT.
I had narrowed it down to two tools LogRocket and Sentry (I also tried Bugsnag but it did not make the final two). Before I get into this I want to say that both of these tools are amazing and whichever you choose will suit your needs well.
I firstly decided to go with LogRocket the fact that they had a recorded screen capture of what the user was doing when the bug happened was amazing... I could go back and rewatch what the user did to replicate that error, this was fantastic. It was also very easy to setup and get going. They had options for React and Redux.js so you can track all your Redux.js actions. I had a fairly large Redux.js store, this was ended up being a issue, it killed the processing power on my machine, Chrome ended up using 2-4gb of ram, so I quickly disabled the Redux.js option.
After using LogRocket for a month or so I decided to switch to Sentry. I noticed that Sentry was openSorce and everyone was talking about Sentry so I thought I may as well give it a test drive. Setting it up was so easy, I had everything up and running within seconds. It also gives you the option to wrap an errorBoundry in React so get more specific errors. The simplicity of Sentry was a breath of fresh air, it allowed me find the bug that was shown to the user and fix that very simply. The UI for Sentry is beautiful and just really clean to look at, and their emails are also just perfect.
I have decided to stick with Sentry for the long run, I tested pretty much all the JS error loggers and I find Sentry the best.
There’s a tool called LeakCanary that was built by the team at Square. It detects memory allocations and can spot when this scenario is occurring. LeakCanary has been billed as a memory leak detection library for #Android (and you’ll be happy to know there’s a Bugsnag integration for it as well!).
related Ensighten posts
- Reliable28
- Consolidates similar errors25
- Easy setup22
- Slack Integration15
- Github Integration10
- Email notifications7
- Includes a free plan6
- Android Application to view errors.5
- Search and filtering4
- Shows request parameters4
- Heroku integration2
- Rejects error report if non-latin characters exists0