Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Aerobatic
Aerobatic

3
11
+ 1
2
Flynn
Flynn

11
22
+ 1
10
Add tool

Aerobatic vs Flynn: What are the differences?

Developers describe Aerobatic as "Smart Hosting for Single Page Apps". In a nutshell, it's a platform as a service (PaaS) for HTML5 web apps. You could think of it as Heroku for the front-end. It provides a streamlined developer workflow and a suite of cloud-based smart hosting modules that are highly complementary to your custom app code running in the browser. On the other hand, Flynn is detailed as "Next generation open source platform as a service". Flynn lets you deploy apps with git push and containers. Developers can deploy any app to any cluster in seconds.

Aerobatic and Flynn can be categorized as "Platform as a Service" tools.

Some of the features offered by Aerobatic are:

  • Build feature-rich HTML 5 single page apps in the cloud
  • Enhanced integration, performance, and security over static apps
  • Built-in asset delivery optimization

On the other hand, Flynn provides the following key features:

  • Flynn goes beyond 12 factor apps. Run any Linux process written in any language or framework, even stateful apps on your own servers or any public cloud.
  • Scaling or adding a new cluster is simple: just add more nodes. Everything is containerized, Flynn takes care of distributing work across the cluster.
  • Flynn is 100% free and open source. Flynn works great out of the box, and since Flynn is modular and API-driven it's easy to modify and swap components to suit your needs.

Flynn is an open source tool with 7.24K GitHub stars and 534 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Flynn's open source repository on GitHub.

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Aerobatic?

In a nutshell, it's a platform as a service (PaaS) for HTML5 web apps. You could think of it as Heroku for the front-end. It provides a streamlined developer workflow and a suite of cloud-based smart hosting modules that are highly complementary to your custom app code running in the browser.

What is Flynn?

Flynn lets you deploy apps with git push and containers. Developers can deploy any app to any cluster in seconds.
Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose Aerobatic?
Why do developers choose Flynn?
What are the cons of using Aerobatic?
What are the cons of using Flynn?
    Be the first to leave a con
      Be the first to leave a con
      What companies use Aerobatic?
      What companies use Flynn?
        No companies found

        Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

        What tools integrate with Aerobatic?
        What tools integrate with Flynn?

        Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

        What are some alternatives to Aerobatic and Flynn?
        Netlify
        Netlify is smart enough to process your site and make sure all assets gets optimized and served with perfect caching-headers from a cookie-less domain. We make sure your HTML is served straight from our CDN edge nodes without any round-trip to our backend servers and are the only ones to give you instant cache invalidation when you push a new deploy. Netlify is also the only static hosting service with integrated continuous deployment.
        BitBalloon
        BitBalloon deploys static sites from development to production in one step. Sites are automatically compressed, cached and pushed to a CDN. Any forms on the site will automatically work. BitBalloon is 100% programmable, everything from deployment to form handling can be controlled through the API. White label reseller options are available for using BitBalloon as a site publishing engine inside 3rd party authoring tools.
        Heroku
        Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.
        Google App Engine
        Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.
        AWS Elastic Beanstalk
        Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.
        See all alternatives
        Decisions about Aerobatic and Flynn
        No stack decisions found
        Interest over time
        Reviews of Aerobatic and Flynn
        No reviews found
        How developers use Aerobatic and Flynn
        No items found
        How much does Aerobatic cost?
        How much does Flynn cost?
        Pricing unavailable
        Pricing unavailable
        News about Aerobatic
        More news
        News about Flynn
        More news