StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Messaging
  4. Group Chat And Notifications
  5. Airtable vs Slack

Airtable vs Slack

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Slack
Slack
Stacks120.8K
Followers97.7K
Votes6.0K
Airtable
Airtable
Stacks1.0K
Followers890
Votes40

Airtable vs Slack: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides a comparison between Airtable and Slack, highlighting their key differences.

  1. Integration and Collaboration: Airtable is primarily a database tool that allows users to organize and analyze data, while Slack is a communication platform that focuses on team collaboration. While Airtable does offer some collaboration features, Slack's main purpose is to facilitate real-time communication and collaboration among teams.

  2. Data Structure and Functionality: Airtable is designed to create databases with structured fields and data types, allowing for complex data organization and analysis. On the other hand, Slack primarily focuses on messaging and file sharing, providing a more flexible and dynamic platform for communication.

  3. Workflow Automation: Airtable offers built-in automation features, such as triggering actions based on certain criteria or events. These features allow users to automate repetitive tasks and streamline workflows. Slack, on the other hand, relies on integrations with third-party apps, such as Zapier or automations built using its API, to achieve workflow automation.

  4. File Sharing and Storage: While both Airtable and Slack allow users to share files, their storage capacities differ. Airtable offers a limited amount of storage space, usually associated with each user or workspace. In contrast, Slack offers more generous storage capabilities, allowing users to store and access a larger number and size of files directly within the platform.

  5. Search and Data Discovery: Airtable provides advanced search capabilities and allows users to filter and sort data based on multiple criteria. It also offers features for visualizing data and creating custom views. Slack, on the other hand, focuses on search within conversations and channels, making it easier to retrieve specific messages or files within the platform.

  6. Pricing and Scalability: Airtable offers a range of pricing plans based on the features and storage capacity required. It provides options for both small teams and larger organizations. In contrast, Slack offers a tiered pricing model primarily based on the number of users, with additional features available at higher price points. Slack's pricing can scale up quickly with the addition of more users, while Airtable's pricing is more flexible and adaptable for different team sizes.

In Summary, Airtable and Slack differ in their main focus, with Airtable prioritizing data organization and analysis, while Slack concentrates on team communication and collaboration. They also differ in terms of workflow automation capabilities, file sharing and storage capacities, search functionalities, and pricing models.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Slack, Airtable

Remotor
Remotor

Apr 13, 2020

Decided

Keybase is a powerful and secure team-organizing software. And because Keybase is so transparently good at what it does, Keybase is a foundational software that facilitates the future of work: effective, inclusive, secure Remote Teams.

Keybase is a free, end-to-end encrypted, open-source program with almost limitless flexibility. Each Keybase user or team is a unique cryptographic identity. Each message or interaction that a user has with a team or other user, is verifiable and digitally-signed. Custom combinations of users/teams/bots, can be designed to catalyze Remote Teams of all kinds, this process can also be automated. Keybase includes Git integration for versioning, bots from multiple platforms to facilitate audio/video-conferencing, a Cryptocurrency wallet, and many advanced privacy features to make you more or less traceable.

Services like Slack and Discord are centralized platforms that perform analytics on your behavior and can sell or leak this data to 3rd parties. Any audio/video features available within Slack or Discord, are bound to be less secure and less flexible than excellent alternatives such as Jitsi. Slack and Discord do have a fun, causal feel to them, which can potentially facilitate social engagement in certain conditions (also many users are already on these platforms).

Centralized and Proprietary team platforms such as Discord and Slack have a large market presence (at least in the USA) based on their first-mover advantage, name recognition, and network effects from size. However these products do not have the flexibility or power of Keybase. Keybase excels on its own excellence, and also has an open and active developer community.

Find us on Keybase: @remotorteam (Keybase username) @remotor.public (Public Keybase Team)

132k views132k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

Apr 24, 2019

Needs adviceonGitterGitterDiscordDiscordSpectrumSpectrum

From a StackShare Community member: “We’re about to start a chat group for our open source project (over 5K stars on GitHub) so we can let our community collaborate more closely. The obvious choice would be Slack (k8s and a ton of major projects use it), but we’ve seen Gitter (webpack uses it) for a lot of open source projects, Discord (Vue.js moved to them), and as of late I’m seeing Spectrum more and more often. Does anyone have experience with these or other alternatives? Is it even worth assessing all these options, or should we just go with Slack? Some things that are important to us: free, all the regular integrations (GitHub, Heroku, etc), mobile & desktop apps, and open source is of course a plus."

1.32M views1.32M
Comments
Stefan
Stefan

CEO / CTO at DROOM! #wirmachenweb #vienna

Feb 10, 2020

Decided

We chose RocketChat over other communications suites like Cliq or Slack mainly because we can self-host it on our own infrastructure. Since we have quite some projects going on which demand that we stay in touch with a lot of different stakeholders, pricing was an issue, too. With RocketChat, we have a huge set of features basically for free, RC offers apps for all major devices and systems and overall, we're very happy with it. The only downside is the limited amount of apps and integrations, but we can make due with what we have available.

159k views159k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Slack
Slack
Airtable
Airtable

Imagine all your team communication in one place, instantly searchable, available wherever you go. That’s Slack. All your messages. All your files. And everything from Twitter, Dropbox, Google Docs, Asana, Trello, GitHub and dozens of other services. All together.

Working with Airtable is as fast and easy as editing a spreadsheet. But only Airtable is backed by the power of a full database, giving you rich features far beyond what a spreadsheet can offer.

Create open channels for the projects, groups and topics that the whole team shares.;Search with context;Autocomplete makes mentioning your teammates quick and painless.;Configurable notifications for desktop, mobile push and email keep you as informed as you’d like.;Everything is perfectly in sync as you move between your desktop, iPhone, iPad, or Android device.;Powerful search & archiving means you can forget when you need to: we’ll remember for you.;Twitter, Dropbox, Google Docs, Asana, Trello, GitHub Integration;Add comments for feedback & stars for easy retrieval;Built-in internal and external sharing options ensure you can get and share any file with anyone
Attachments;Link Tables;Fully mobile;Instant collaboration;Easily undo mistakes
Statistics
Stacks
120.8K
Stacks
1.0K
Followers
97.7K
Followers
890
Votes
6.0K
Votes
40
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1209
    Easy to integrate with
  • 876
    Excellent interface on multiple platforms
  • 849
    Free
  • 694
    Mobile friendly
  • 690
    People really enjoy using it
Cons
  • 13
    Can be distracting depending on how you use it
  • 6
    Limit messages history
  • 6
    Requires some management for large teams
  • 5
    Too expensive
  • 5
    You don't really own your messages
Pros
  • 19
    Powerful and easy to use
  • 8
    Robust and dynamic
  • 6
    Quick UI Layer
  • 4
    Practical built in views
  • 3
    Robust API documentation
Integrations
GitHub
GitHub
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Zapier
Zapier
Stripe
Stripe
Asana
Asana
GoSquared
GoSquared
Dropbox
Dropbox
New Relic
New Relic
Google Drive
Google Drive
Zendesk
Zendesk
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Slack, Airtable?

HipChat

HipChat

HipChat is a hosted private chat service for your company or team. Invite colleagues to share ideas and files in persistent group chat rooms. Get your team off AIM, Google Talk, and Skype — HipChat was built for business.

Zulip

Zulip

Zulip is powerful, open source team chat that combines the immediacy of real-time chat with the productivity benefits of threaded conversations. Zulip allows busy managers and others in meetings all day to participate in their teams chats.

RocketChat

RocketChat

Rocket.Chat is a Web Chat Server, developed in JavaScript, using the Meteor fullstack framework. It is a great solution for communities and companies wanting to privately host their own chat service or for developers looking forward to build and evolve their own chat platforms.

Mattermost

Mattermost

Mattermost is modern communication from behind your firewall.

Gitter

Gitter

Free chat rooms for your public repositories. A bit like IRC only smarter. Chats for private repositories as well as organisations.

Flowdock

Flowdock

Flowdock is a web-based team chat service that integrates with your tools to provide a window into your team's activities. With the team inbox, everyone on your team can stay up to date. Stay connected with Flowdock's iOS and Android apps.

Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams

See content and chat history anytime, including team chats with Skype that are visible to the whole team. Private group chats are available for smaller group conversations.

Telegram

Telegram

Users can send messages and exchange photos, videos, stickers, audio and files of any type. It provides instant messaging, simple, fast, secure and synced across all your devices.

Keybase Teams

Keybase Teams

Keybase is for anyone. Imagine a Slack for the whole world, except end-to-end encrypted across all your devices. Or a Team Dropbox where the server can't leak your files or be hacked.

Fleep

Fleep

Leave email behind and manage all conversations with your team, partners and clients in Fleep. If some of them are not Fleep users yet, they will receive all messages as normal emails.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope