StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Languages
  5. Akka vs Erlang

Akka vs Erlang

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Erlang
Erlang
Stacks1.4K
Followers749
Votes345
GitHub Stars11.9K
Forks3.0K
Akka
Akka
Stacks1.2K
Followers1.0K
Votes88

Akka vs Erlang: What are the differences?

Introduction

Akka and Erlang are both popular programming frameworks used for building concurrent and distributed systems. While they have similarities in terms of their capabilities and goals, there are several key differences between Akka and Erlang.

  1. Scala vs Erlang: Akka is written in Scala and runs on the Java Virtual Machine (JVM), while Erlang is its own programming language. This difference in programming languages affects the syntax and style of the code, with Akka relying on Scala's object-oriented and functional programming features, while Erlang has its own unique syntax.

  2. Actor Model: Both Akka and Erlang are based on the concept of the actor model, which allows for concurrent and parallel processing. However, the implementation and features of the actor model differ in the two frameworks. Akka provides a more flexible and extensible actor model, allowing actors to be created and managed in a hierarchical fashion, while Erlang has a simpler actor model with built-in fault tolerance mechanisms.

  3. Concurrency and Parallelism: Akka and Erlang approach concurrency and parallelism differently. Akka utilizes a thread-based approach, where each actor is associated with its own thread, allowing for fine-grained control over concurrent processing. On the other hand, Erlang uses lightweight processes (also known as Erlang processes) that are managed by the virtual machine, allowing for millions of concurrent processes to be created and executed efficiently.

  4. Fault Tolerance: Both Akka and Erlang prioritize fault tolerance and provide mechanisms to handle failures in distributed systems. However, Erlang has a stronger emphasis on fault tolerance, with built-in features such as supervisors and the "let-it-crash" philosophy. Akka, while also providing fault tolerance mechanisms, allows for more flexibility in defining fault-handling strategies by leveraging Scala's object-oriented and functional programming features.

  5. Ecosystem and Community: Akka and Erlang have different ecosystems and communities surrounding them. Akka benefits from its integration with the Java ecosystem and has a larger community of developers. This results in a wider range of libraries, tools, and resources available for Akka developers. Erlang, on the other hand, has a smaller but dedicated community that has contributed to a rich set of libraries and tools specific to the Erlang ecosystem.

  6. Performance and Scalability: Akka and Erlang have different performance characteristics and scalability capabilities. Akka, being built on the JVM, can take advantage of the underlying infrastructure and optimizations provided by the JVM, resulting in high-performance applications. Erlang, on the other hand, is known for its lightweight processes and message-passing concurrency model, which makes it highly scalable and efficient in handling concurrent workloads.

In summary, Akka and Erlang differ in terms of the programming language they are built upon, their actor model implementations, concurrency and parallelism approaches, fault tolerance mechanisms, ecosystems and communities, and performance and scalability characteristics. Despite these differences, both frameworks excel at building distributed and concurrent systems.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Erlang
Erlang
Akka
Akka

Some of Erlang's uses are in telecoms, banking, e-commerce, computer telephony and instant messaging. Erlang's runtime system has built-in support for concurrency, distribution and fault tolerance. OTP is set of Erlang libraries and design principles providing middle-ware to develop these systems.

Akka is a toolkit and runtime for building highly concurrent, distributed, and resilient message-driven applications on the JVM.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
11.9K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
3.0K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
1.4K
Stacks
1.2K
Followers
749
Followers
1.0K
Votes
345
Votes
88
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 62
    Real time, distributed applications
  • 62
    Concurrency Support
  • 58
    Fault tolerance
  • 36
    Soft real-time
  • 32
    Open source
Cons
  • 1
    Languange is not popular demand
Pros
  • 32
    Great concurrency model
  • 17
    Fast
  • 12
    Actor Library
  • 10
    Open source
  • 7
    Resilient
Cons
  • 3
    Mixing futures with Akka tell is difficult
  • 2
    No type safety
  • 2
    Closing of futures
  • 1
    Typed actors still not stable
  • 1
    Very difficult to refactor

What are some alternatives to Erlang, Akka?

JavaScript

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Scala

Scala

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Elixir

Elixir

Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase