Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Amazon CloudWatch vs AppDynamics: What are the differences?
Key Differences between Amazon CloudWatch and AppDynamics
Amazon CloudWatch and AppDynamics are two popular monitoring and observability tools used in the field of cloud computing and application performance management. While both serve the purpose of enabling organizations to monitor and manage their applications and cloud infrastructure, there are several key differences between them that set them apart.
Functionality: Amazon CloudWatch is primarily focused on monitoring and managing resources and services within the Amazon Web Services (AWS) ecosystem. It provides monitoring for AWS resources such as EC2 instances, RDS databases, DynamoDB tables, and more. On the other hand, AppDynamics offers more comprehensive application performance monitoring capabilities, allowing organizations to monitor the performance and behavior of their applications in real-time.
Scope: CloudWatch is a cloud-native monitoring tool provided by AWS, making it highly compatible and integrated with AWS services. It provides detailed insights and metrics about AWS resources and services. In contrast, AppDynamics is a third-party solution that can monitor applications across multiple cloud environments and even on-premises infrastructure. It is also compatible with a wide range of programming languages and frameworks.
Granularity: CloudWatch offers high granularity in terms of monitoring metrics, allowing users to collect and analyze metrics at a minute-level frequency. This level of granularity enables users to have a detailed understanding of the performance and behavior of their AWS resources. AppDynamics, on the other hand, provides even greater granularity by offering real-time visibility into application performance, down to the code level. It captures detailed transactional data and provides deep insights into application behavior and performance bottlenecks.
Alerting and Notification: CloudWatch provides flexible alerting and notification capabilities, allowing users to set up alarms based on customizable thresholds. When an alarm is triggered, notifications can be sent via email, SMS, or integrated with other AWS services. AppDynamics also offers robust alerting and notification features, allowing users to set up thresholds based on various performance metrics. Additionally, it provides the ability to escalate alerts and integrate with popular notification systems.
Cost Structure: CloudWatch has a pricing model based on usage, where users pay for the number of metrics and API requests made. It offers a free tier with limited features and additional costs for higher resource usage. AppDynamics, being a third-party solution, has a different pricing structure based on the number of monitored hosts and the level of functionality required. It offers different tiers for different levels of monitoring and additional features.
Ease of Use and Setup: CloudWatch is tightly integrated with AWS services and can be easily set up and used within the AWS ecosystem. It provides a well-documented API and offers SDKs for various programming languages. AppDynamics, with its comprehensive features, may require a more complex setup process, especially when monitoring applications across multiple environments. However, it offers extensive documentation, support, and a user-friendly interface.
In Summary, the key differences between Amazon CloudWatch and AppDynamics lie in their functionality, scope, granularity, alerting capabilities, cost structure, and ease of use. While CloudWatch primarily focuses on monitoring AWS resources, AppDynamics offers more comprehensive monitoring capabilities for applications in various environments.
Hey there! We are looking at Datadog, Dynatrace, AppDynamics, and New Relic as options for our web application monitoring.
Current Environment: .NET Core Web app hosted on Microsoft IIS
Future Environment: Web app will be hosted on Microsoft Azure
Tech Stacks: IIS, RabbitMQ, Redis, Microsoft SQL Server
Requirement: Infra Monitoring, APM, Real - User Monitoring (User activity monitoring i.e., time spent on a page, most active page, etc.), Service Tracing, Root Cause Analysis, and Centralized Log Management.
Please advise on the above. Thanks!
Hi Folks,
I am trying to evaluate Site24x7 against AppDynamics, Dynatrace, and New Relic. Has anyone used Site24X7? If so, what are your opinions on the tool? I know that the license costs are very low compared to other tools in the market. Other than that, are there any major issues anyone has encountered using the tool itself?
what are the most important things you are looking for the tools to do? each has their strong points... are you looking to monitor new tech like containers, k8s, and microservices?
Pros of Amazon CloudWatch
- Monitor aws resources76
- Zero setup46
- Detailed Monitoring30
- Backed by Amazon23
- Auto Scaling groups19
- SNS and autoscaling integrations11
- Burstable instances metrics (t2 cpu credit balance)5
- HIPAA/PCI/SOC Compliance-friendly3
- Native tool for AWS so understand AWS out of the box1
Pros of AppDynamics
- Deep code visibility21
- Powerful13
- Real-Time Visibility8
- Great visualization7
- Easy Setup6
- Comprehensive Coverage of Programming Languages6
- Deep DB Troubleshooting4
- Excellent Customer Support3
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Amazon CloudWatch
- Poor Search Capabilities2
Cons of AppDynamics
- Expensive5
- Poor to non-existent integration with aws services2